Advanced Search Results

Sham Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11, 11(2), 19, 21(1) and 62; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 22, 22(2), 22(3), 173(8) and 177; Border Security Force (Amendment) Rules, 1990

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)6; 96(2002)DLT602; 2002(62)DRJ361; 2003(1)SLJ48(Delhi)

of the aforesaidconclusions, I hold that there is no merit in thiswrit petition and the writ petition standsdismissed. Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 11(2)--Border Security Force Rules, 1969--Rule 22--Dismissal from service--Petitioner, unauthorisedly absent and did not report for duty--Show

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … of the Force, but also for bringing disrepute to the Force which is an offence in terms of Section 40 of the Act3. Such action had been taken as a follow up on the complaint lodged by … what we have ordered, then there shall be no recovery from him. 22. In support of the submission for claiming back wages and to urge

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), 74(5) and 115; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 22, 160 and 161

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN638

Matched in: Parties Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra and ors.

Chokha Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 22; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48, 48(3), 49(3), 51, 59 to 64, 142(1), 142(2) and 157

Reported in : 110(2004)DLT268; 2004(73)DRJ450; 2004(3)SLJ44(Delhi)

all subjected to any cross-examination on behalf of the petitioner. 8. In terms of Section 21 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, where any person subject to the Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a willful defiance … of evidence, by an order dated 20.2.2002, Shri S.K.Wadhwa, Commandant, ordered assembly of Summary Security Force Court(SSFC) on 22nd of February, 2002 at 10.00 a.m. at Headquarters, 19 Bn. BSF, Amritsar (Punjab) for trial of the petitioner

Ex-constable Ramvir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 22, 63 and 117; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 41; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 157; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(16)SCALE253; (2009)3SCC97:2009AIRSCW163:2009(1)LHSC93

before a Summary Security Force Court on the aforementioned two charges in terms of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, 'the Act') and the rules framed thereunder.4. He pleaded guilty to both the charges. He was … while he was in prison, it does not come within the purview of 'misconduct' within the meaning of Section 22 of the Act.8. Mr. A. Sharan, learned Additional Solicitor General, on the other hand, submitted:i. Appellant being in

Jitender Singh (Ex. Head Const) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 12, 19 and 122; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 20, 22, 22(2), 22(3), 22(4) and 28A and 177; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(93)DRJ108

writ petition is disposed of in the above terms, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 12 - Border Security Force Rules--1969--Rules 28A and 177--Dismissal for overstaying from leave--Administrative order--No enquiry conducted--Non compliance … of in the above terms, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 12 - Border Security Force Rules--1969--Rules 28A and 177--Dismissal for overstaying from leave--Administrative order--No enquiry conducted--Non compliance of … or remove a person other than the Officer, in accordance with Rule 22 is questioned. The grievance is with regard to the method in which … apply their mind to this most pertinent aspect of the case.8. Under Section 19(a) of the BSF Act, 'absent without leave' is an offence which

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer … ORDERV.K. Jhanji, J.1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, challenge is

Devender Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

by this Court be paid within four weeks. With these directions and observations, the writ petition is allowed. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 22-E and 40 - Difference between “misconduct reinstatement” and illegal termination - misconduct reinstatement refers to

Suresh Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 62

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR422(Jhr)]

he reported for duty nor sent any information/reply to the said letters. As per Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, Court of inquiry was ordered vide Officer Order No. 13271-76 dated 27.12.2003 and apprehension roll was also issued … leave of two month, by six months as he was suffering from Lumbo Sciatica Syndrome. Relying on Rule 22 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, it is submitted that departmental proceeding should have been initiated against

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was … continued to remain absent action was initiated against him under Section 11 of BSF Act read with Rule 22(2) and 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 on the administrative side. A show cause notice was served on