Advanced Search Results

Laxman Chandra Sarkar Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 21(2)

be permissible under the proviso to Sub-Rule 1 of Rule 41 of the Pension Rules. 17. No costs. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 21(2) - Disobedience to superior officer -- Enrolled on 20.12.1973 as a Constable (Radio Mechanic) in BSF, petitioner

Rakesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 21(2), 24, 35 and 46; Army Act; Evidence Act; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 44, 45B, 45B(1), 45B(2), 48 and 53(2); Army Rules - Rule 149; Defence Service Regulations

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT663

T.S. Thakur, J.1. The petitioner is serving as Commandant in the Border Security Force. He is facing trial by the General, Security Force hereinafter referred to as GSFC for disobedience of lawful … and for making false allegations against his superiors punishable under Sections 21(2), 24(b) and 35(a) of the BSF Act, 1968. The charges framed against the petitioner read as under:CHARGE SHEET The accused Shri Rakesh Sharma, Second-in-Command, IRLA No. … him, malingering and for making false allegations against his superiors punishable under Sections 21(2), 24(b) and 35(a) of the BSF Act, 1968. The charges framed

Chokha Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 22; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48, 48(3), 49(3), 51, 59 to 64, 142(1), 142(2) and 157

Reported in : 110(2004)DLT268; 2004(73)DRJ450; 2004(3)SLJ44(Delhi)

all subjected to any cross-examination on behalf of the petitioner. 8. In terms of Section 21 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, where any person subject to the Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a willful defiance … B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. The petitioner, a constable in Border Security Force(BSF), was on 11th of February, 2002, at about 8.00 p.m. ordered by Assistant Commandant, Shri Rajiv Bhardwaj, Company Commander, to proceed from `D' Coy

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer … 17.12.1993 at home and after recovery from the illness, he reported to the Headquarters, I.G., B.S.F., Jammu, on 21.12.1993, and submitted an application along with medical certificate for joining duty and requested to regularize the overstay period

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was … from duty from TAC HQ 105 Bn BSF. He was informed at his home town through letter dated 21-8-1999 to join the duties immediately, but he did not do so. On expiry of 30 days of his … petitioner vide order dated 10-3-2000 and treating the period of absence from 2-8-1999 to 9-3-1999 (221 days) as Dies Non is under challenge in the

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the … service is undesirable. I, therefore, DISMISS him from service with effect from 28 Dec 1992 (FN) under Rule 177 of BSF Rules 1969. His absence

Randhir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226;; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 16, 17, 40, 46,47, 74, 74(1)(2), 115, 116, 117 and 167(2);; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 51(2), 142(2), 143, 143(2), 145, 147, 148, 149, 157 and 159

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT107(HC)

Admittedly the charges against the petitioner came within the purview of section 16(d) and section 46 of the Border Security Force Act which read thus :--'16. Offences punishable more severely on active duty than at other times--any person subject to … Randhir Singh of this unit has been charged with an Offences under section 16(d) and 40 of BSF Act 1968 committed on 10.3.92 at BOP Bornberia at about 21.30 hrs. left the said picauet without orders from his … order of punishment imposed upon him to quash order dated 10.7.92 and 29.1.93 as contained in annexure 'C' and 'G' respectively to the writ petition.2.

Comdt. Atul Kumar Singh Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Section 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

the finding and sentence of the Security Force Court in terms of the provisions of Section 107 of Border Security Force Act, 1968. 20. Aggrieved by the finding and sentence awarded by the Security Force Court which stood confirmed by the … sector to Paniasagar sector in a civil truck in their presence. 7. SI/MT G.P.Tewari PW-3, deposed that on 21/22.11.2004 the petitioner called him at his residence and told him that he has purchased a gypsy at an … "BSF") and was promoted to the post of Commandant in the year 2002. In the year 2005 he was attached with the 18th Bn. BSF

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Rule 149 of the BSF Rules, 1969 or by the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. In the said case, the Supreme Court had carefully examined the provisions of Rule 149 of the Border … duty of the Executive Officer to have enquired into the matter and to have proceeded against Sh.B.P.Mandal under Section 21 of the Act of 1978. The act on the part of the Executive Officer, Sh.K.B.L.Bhatnagar is also reflective

The Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. G. Majumdar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978CriLJ80

to take note of certain facts and relevant laws touching the materials on record.6. Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act. 1968 says that when a Criminal Court and a Security Force Court have each jurisdiction in respect of an … of West Bengal against orders passed by the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magisr trate, Bongaon, 24-Parganas on 22-3-1976 and 21-5-1976 in connexion with the G. R. Case No. 683 of 1974 arising out of Bagda P. S. Case … Bengal against orders passed by the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magisr trate, Bongaon, 24-Parganas on 22-3-1976 and 21-5-1976 in connexion with the G. R. Case No.