Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 17, 46, 64, 70, 70(1), 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 70(5), 74, 117, 117(2) and 141; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 165; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 99, 99(1) and 133 to 161; Army Rules - Rule 66(1)

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE396

the High Court directed remand in all the matters to the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) for rewriting the order, giving reasons in support of the … that Rule 99 will not apply to SSFC. The procedure for SSFC is provided in Chapter XI (Rules 133 to Rule 161), which alone is relevant here. It must be noted here that though Rule 99 was

Narendra Bahadur Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

the High Court has also to be added to the period of sentence under Section 133 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, which reads as under:“133. Computation of period of suspension :- Any period during which the sentence is under

Pravin Bataniya vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and has challenged his dismissal from service vide the impugned order dated 30.11.2020 under Section 11 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (the Act) read with Rule 177 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (the Rules) and Rule 22(1)(b) … case of Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel, (1985) 3 SCC 398 wherein the Court in paragraph nos. 133, 138, 142 and 144, has held as under:“133. The second condition necessary for the valid application of clause

Zubeda Begum and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 73(1), 258(1) and 298; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1) and 17

Reported in : AIR1971All452

notification. It may be mentioned that the Air Force Station at Gorakhpur is essential for the purposes of border security and the Government have considered it imperative that accommodation for the married officers of the Air Force should … (FB) and the Management of Bararee Coke Plant v. Their Workmen, AIR 1968 Pat 133. The Assam case, it may be mentioned, was regarding the … 9th March, 1970, the Governor of Uttar Pradesh issued two notifications under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. Both the notifications mentioned that the public purpose which was to be subserved by acquisition of the

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … is statutorily provided and the procedure which is to be followed by it is statutorily prescripted under Rules 133 to 161 of Chapter XI of the BSF Rules, 1969. Essential procedural safeguards have been statutorily provided so

Const. Hans Raj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act - Sections 87, 74, 99, 117, 117(2), 139 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 148, 149 , 167 to 169; ;Army Act, 1958 - Sections 116; ;Army Rules - Rules 62, 103 to 133 and 133-161; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 378(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 33, 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(87)DRJ108

issue involved in these group of petitions is whether in an order passed under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act(hereinafter referred to as the `BSF Act') in dealing with appeals against the orders of Security Force Court and … Summary Security Force Court is held under Section 74 read with Rules 133-161 of the Border Security Force Act. General Court Martials under the Army … protection from bias against an officer. We may notice that the Act which was enacted in the year 1968 even sought to fill up the gaps occurring in other Acts like Army Act, Navy Act or Armed

Asarco Inc. Vs. Idaho State Tax Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Service Tax

337 . The trial court, however, found that ASARCO "has never been required to utilize its stock as security for borrowing of working capital, acquiring stock or securities in other companies or to support any bond issues." … its basic arguments -- in practical effect -- would seriously undermine their force as precedents. It relies primarily on considerations quite different from those identified … levy on appellant ASARCO Inc. for the years 1968, 1969, and 1970. ASARCO is a corporation that … U. S. 315 -330. (a) As a general principle, a State may not tax value earned outside its borders. "[T]he linchpin of apportionability in the field of state income taxation is the unitary business principle." Mobil Oil … would permit nondomiciliary States to apportion and tax dividends "[w]here the business activities of the dividend payor have nothing to do with the activities of … losses constitute business income as defined in this section." Idaho Code § 63-3027(f)(3) (Supp.1981). "Interest and dividends … by any other company using it." Id. at 133a. [ Footnote 19 ] For the years in

Jones Vs. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

abridged here. Appellants' conclusion that the presence of a prisoners' union would be detrimental to prison order and security has not been conclusively shown to be wrong, and the regulations drafted were no broader than necessary to … ] overturning that ban Page 433 U. S. 145 would sap all force from the rationale for excluding bulk mailings. The exclusion would then be … (which performed rehabilitation services). Pp. 433 U. S. 133 -136. 409 F.Supp. 937, reversed. REHNQUIST, J., delivered … "membership" but prohibited inmate-to-inmate solicitation (as well, it should be noted, as meetings, or other group activities) as bordering "on the irrational," and felt that "[t]he defendants' on hypothesis in this case is that the existence of … EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Syllabus Appellee prisoners' labor union brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that its First Amendment and equal

Richardson Vs. Ramirez

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

ex-felons denied the right to register after the three named plaintiffs had been granted that right. Indiana Employment Security Div. v. Burney, 409 U. S. 540 (1973). But California is at liberty to prescribe its own rules … other criminals, would gentlemen be willing to repeal the laws now in force in order to give them an opportunity to land their piratical crafts … 114 U. S. 15 (1885); Davis v. Beason, 133 U. S. 333 (1890). Much more recently, we … State should have its basis of national representation enlarged by reason of a portion of citizens within its borders to which the elective franchise is denied. If political power shall be lost because of such denial, not … The three county officials named as defendants decided not to contest the action, and told the court they would henceforth register to vote ex-felons, including … device for obtaining the franchise, noting that, during 1968-1971, 34,262 persons were released from state prisons, but … Clause. Pp. 418 U. S. 54 -55. (b) Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which contains the

Wilkie Vs. Robbins

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Smith, an employee of the Bureau of Indian Affairs who manages lands along the High Island Ranch’s southern border, and pressured him to impound Robbins’s cattle. Smith told Robbins, but did nothing more. Finally, in January 2003, … U. S. 669 (1987); Chappell v. Wallace , 462 U. S. 296 (1983), and wrongful denials of Social Security disability benefits, Schweiker v. Chilicky , 487 U. S. 412 (1988). We have seen no case for extending … broke down, defendant-petitioners (defendants) began a campaign of harassment and intimidation to force him to regrant the lost easement. Robbins’s suit for damages and declaratory … point” in his decision to retire. Id., at 133. Vessels and his supervisor, defendant Charles Wilkie, continued … declaratory and injunctive relief now includes a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) claim that defendants repeatedly tried to extort an easement from him … in return for a right-of-way to maintain a section of road running across federal land to otherwise