Advanced Search Results

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Baljinder Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2006(3)SLJ392(P& H)

decision of the Summary Security Force Court, the petitioner preferred a statutory petition under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 along with an application under Section 130 of the Act for suspension of the sentence imposed upon him.

Prosenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Cour ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Army Rules; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Evidence Act - Sections 32; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226 and 227; Border Security Force Act - Sections 117(2) and 130; Border Security Force Rules; defense Service Regulations

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ856

the writ petition the petitioner moved an application for suspension of his sentence on the ground that under Section 130 of the Border Security Force Act, sentence can be suspended by the Director General or any other empowered … of the Director General, BSF rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, and a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential … to be tried by the General Security Force Court on the following charge framed under Section 46 BSF Act, 1968 read with Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.The accused No. 96122002 Constable Prosenjit Kundu of 70 Battalion,

Narendra Bahadur Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

the High Court has also to be added to the period of sentence under Section 133 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, which reads as under:“133. Computation of period of suspension :- Any period during which the sentence is under … of the Act which also reads as under:“134. Order after suspension :- The authority or officer specified in section 130 may, at any time while a sentence is suspended, order - (a) that the offender be committed to

Head Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 107 and 108; Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rule 48; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 304A; Evidence Act - Sections 24

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2585

months from the receipt of the Court order. The respondents defended the vires of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 and contended that the same were in accordance with the provisions … of the procedural safeguards envisaged by the Statute .....' 'We are afraid, the non-compliance of the mandate of Section 130 is an infirmity which goes to the root of the jurisdiction and without more, vitiates the proceedings. Indeed

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails … into the Border Security Force. In 1995, he was promoted as a lance naik and finally posted to 130Bn B.S.F. located at Salbagan, Tripura in which position he was serving at the time of the incident resulting

Special Police Establishment versus Kamta Prasad Mishra and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 7 S.C.R. 113

Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949; Border Security Force Act, 1968; Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968; Penal Code, 1860; Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013; U. P. Lokayukt and … 25.08.2011 issued by the General Administration Department2 of the State of Madhya Pradesh in exercise of power under Section 24(4) of the Right to Information Act, 20053 and in view of Section 8(1)(h) thereof, it could not

Bhanwara Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 113, 114 and 115; CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 15(2); Board Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 160

and perused, the records. 6. Admittedly, for commission of civil offence as defined under Section 46 of 'the Border Security Force Act, 1968' (shortly the Act), the SSFC was assembled to enquire/try the petitioner on the charge framed and after recording … by the DIG, BSF, TRA (South) dismissing the petitioner from service. 2. The petitioner being a Constable under 130 Bn BSF was deployed for OP duty at OP No. 6 Kalimandir on 19.11.1998 from 1200 hrs. to

Satyawan Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

take meal was due to some physical ailment, or an act of belligerency. The petitioner was member of Border Security Force and as a soldier he was amenable to the Rules and Regulations governing his service condition and he … 10, 2004 he was produced before the Commandant for having committed an offence under Section 19(b) of BSF Act, 1968 for overstaying leave. The petitioner claims to have pleaded ‘Not Guilty’ to the charge, claiming that due to … of the Court-Martial are vitiated by noncompliance with the mandate of Section 130(1) of the Act in that the Summary Court Martial did not afford

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … materia with Rule 127 of 'Old' or 1955 Rules. Similarly the New Rule 12 materially reproduces Old Rule 130 and provides for list of persons approved for promotion at different ranks to be maintained and speaks of