Advanced Search Results

Special Police Establishment versus Kamta Prasad Mishra and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 7 S.C.R. 113

Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949; Border Security Force Act, 1968; Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968; Penal Code, 1860; Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013; U. P. Lokayukt and … forty-five days from the date of the receipt of request.[2026] 7 S.C.R. 129 Special Police Establishment v. Kamta Prasad Mishra and Others(5) Every notification issued … 25.08.2011 issued by the General Administration Department2 of the State of Madhya Pradesh in exercise of power under Section 24(4) of the Right to Information Act, 20053 and in view of Section 8(1)(h) thereof, it could not

Rabindranath Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2008Ori19

ghaty receive such pay, pension and other remuneration, as may be prescribed.There are also similar provision in the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 etc.14. In the case of Akhilesh Prasad v. Union Territory of … CISF, Assam Rifles, Indo-Tibetan Border Security Force, S.S. B. Security Force and Rapid Action Force. In this regard, Section 3 of the C.R.P.F. Act 1949, is liable to be perused. The same is reproduced as under:3. Constitution … the express language of that clause itself, to the interpretation of Sections 129 to 132 of the Cr. P. C. and the argument, therefore, advanced

Smt Shashi Rekha vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

3 passed an order of dismissal against the petitioner's son for an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short ‘BSF Act’). The respondent No.3 again passed anorder of dismissal against the petitioner's son for anoffence … on 05.11.2013. On 14.11.2013, the petitioner's son got the reply from the second respondent that as per Rule 129 of the BSF Rules, 1969, that he has -4-to obtain a copy of SSFC proceedings from the Chief

Amresh Sharma vs.director General, Border Security Force

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

trial was held by the General Security Force Court (for short ‘G.S.F.C.’) established under Section 64 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act). Two separate charge sheets were framed by the G.S.F.C. The first charge sheet was issued under … Investigation decided on January 18, 2018.8. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent would rely on Section 129 of the BSF Act to contend that a person tried by the Security Force Court is entitled to

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … 119(1) read with its Proviso, leaves no room for any doubt in regard to its mandatory character. Rule 129 partakes the same character as the provision is complementary and rights contemplated under both rules are indeed inter-linked

Hargovind Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

the petitioner. The petitioner submitted a petition dated 11th December, 1999 under Sub-section (1) of Section 117-of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, (for brevity, 'the BSF Act') to the Confirming Authority pointing out some irregularities in the proceeding before the … with the law on the subject. Mr. Dhar further submitted that in accordance with the provisions in Rule 129 of the BSF Rules, the petitioner was furnished with the copies of all relevant documents, and the submission

Dr. Sushil Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

Against this order, a pre-confirmation appeal was filed by the present petitioner as per Section 117(1) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. While the said appeal was still pending, the said Authority, namely, the Director General, HQ, BSF, New Delhi … petitioner on 10.3.2014 and is yet to pass appropriate orders thereon. Mr. Lokesh Mathur also submitted that Rule 129 of the BSF Rules, 1969 framed under the BSF Act, 1968 permits copies to be given on demand

New Haven Inclusion Cases

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

element in the Penn Central System. An interchange track runs from the Port Morris branch line to the border of the Oak Point yard. Before the Commission, the parties submitted five different estimates of the value of … F.Supp. at 800. (Footnote omitted.) Although the extent to which the ongoing deficit operation has impaired the bondholders' security is unclear, it is undeniable that the continued operation of the railroad into the late 1960's, together with … of the New Haven properties. Although the Purchase Agreement "carrie[d] some probative force as to the values of the properties involved, it [was] by no … Penn Central, which was done on December 31, 1968. The bondholders filed objections to the revised evaluation … 212 U. S. 126 , 212 U. S. 129 ; Wabash R. Co. v. Adelbert College, 208 … Court sustained the Penn Central merger (389 U.S. 486), it upheld the action of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) in conditioning its approval of the … the questions presented by the complaint herein under Section 5(2) of the Interstate Commerce Act will also

United States Vs. Peltier

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

S. 266 , which held that a warrantless automobile search, conducted about 25 air miles from the Mexican border by Border Patrol agents acting without probable cause, contravened the Fourth Amendment, does not apply to Border Patrol … in complete good faith, however, the deterrence rationale loses much of its force." The "reliability and relevancy," Linkletter, supra at 381 U. S. 639 , … about 25 air miles from the Mexican border by Border Patrol agents acting without probable cause, contravened the Fourth Amendment, does not apply to Border … rejected Goldman v. United States, 316 U. S. 129 (1942), and Olmstead v. United States, 277 U. … States, supra, this Court held that, in a federal prosecution the Fourth Amendment barred the use of evidence secured through an illegal search and seizure." (Emphasis added.) Elkins v. United States, 364 U. S. 206 , 364

Dunaway Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Right to Information

jacket). United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U. S. 873 (1975), applied Terry in the special context of roving border patrols stopping automobiles to check for illegal immigrants. The investigative stops usually consumed Page 442 U. S. 211 … Nothing is more clear than that the Fourth Amendment was meant to prevent wholesale intrusions upon the personal security of our Page 442 U. S. 215 citizenry, whether these intrusions be termed 'arrests' or 'investigatory detentions.'" Id. … for Fourth Amendment purposes. "Only when the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of … 492 (1978), quoting People v. Morales, 42 N.Y.2d 129, 135, 366 N.E.2d 248, 251 (1977). The Appellate … "arrest." Nevertheless, the Court held that even this type of "necessarily swift action predicated upon the on-the-spot observations of the officer on the beat" constituted