Advanced Search Results
Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.
Delhi
Jan-04-2002
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 446, 451, 475, 475(1) and 482; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 80 and 81; Border Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3 to 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 337; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 9; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125 and 126
2002IIIAD(Delhi)433; 96(2002)DLT217; 2002(62)DRJ16
by the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, dismissing application moved by the Commanding Officer under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, 'BSF Act') read with BSF Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the … Rules, 1952 and the Sections 80 and 81 of the BSF Act are equivalent to Sections 125 and 126 of the Army Act, 1950. She argued that under Section 46 of the BSF Act, offences under Sections
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi
Aug-20-2014
Land Acquisition
of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … Section 13 (1) (e) read with Section 13 (2) of the PC Act without following the procedure under Section 126 of the Army Act, 1950. The Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court discussed the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Another Vs. O.P. Bishnoi
Delhi
May-11-2000
Service
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rules 45 and 46
2000VAD(Delhi)937; 2000(54)DRJ264
matter on merits. Investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed by a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present … learned Single Judge was that the respondent was tried by General Security Force Court on a charge under Section 31(b) of the Border Security Force Act (for short the Act) namely :- without proper authority extract from … Court. 8. Another ground of attack is to the finding that Rule 126 of the Rules had been violated by the Law Officer in rendering
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hargovind Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Guwahati
Feb-26-2002
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226
the petitioner. The petitioner submitted a petition dated 11th December, 1999 under Sub-section (1) of Section 117-of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, (for brevity, 'the BSF Act') to the Confirming Authority pointing out some irregularities in the proceeding before the … of the BSF Act.3. Mr. K.N. Bhattacharjee, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that under Rule 126 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, (hereinafter referred to as 'the BSF Rules'), the Law Officer has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Sep-19-2000
Criminal
2001(1)WLN135
of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance … martial, had decided to the contrary. In these circumstances, there was no occasion to follow the procedure under Section 126 or Rule 4.28. Another case, relied upon by the prosecution i.e. Balbir Singh's case (supra) is not only
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-26-2000
Service
2000(2)WLN635
the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … for confirmation and promulgation. Chapter X deals with the procedure of Security Force Courts and Incidental Matters. Rule 126 provides powers and duties of a law officer. Thus, it is evident that the B.S.F. Act and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Virpal Singh
Jammu and Kashmir
Aug-12-2015
Education
provided sufficient opportunity of hearing to the respondent, that the Court of Inquiry held u/s 62 of The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) beside other material before the Commandant was sufficient for the Commandant to … Supreme Court in Satwati Deswal v. State of Haryana, (2010) 1 SCC 126. 8. In our view, the High Court had fallen in grave error … respondent to trial nor were the reports adverse to the delinquent neither the findings of the inquiry under Section 62 of the Act supplied to the respondent. 14. The mere fact that enquiry under section 62 was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChand NaraIn Gautam Vs. Smt. Saroj Gautam
Rajasthan
Nov-01-1974
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9
AIR1975Raj88; 1974(7)WLN808
Panchmarhi (M. P.) and last resided together at Chaksu near Jaipur. The husband is now employed in the Border Security Force. 3. The husband presented a petition on February 18, 1969 saying that after marriage he encouraged his wife … to beat her and she suffered in silence. It was in July 1968 that the husband threatened to marry another woman and issued invitations to … Cal 140 Binda v. Kaunsilia, (1891) 13 All 126 and Dadaji Bhikaji v. Rukmabai, (1886) ILR 10 … of all his efforts she did not improve her habits and temperament. His grievance is that the wife acted contrary to 'his wishes, suggestions and directions' and levelled false charges against him of alcoholic intemperance, consumption of … same, aggrieved by which the husband comes up in an appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance. 2. It is not disputed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Haven Inclusion Cases
US Supreme Court
Jun-29-1970
Land Acquisition
element in the Penn Central System. An interchange track runs from the Port Morris branch line to the border of the Oak Point yard. Before the Commission, the parties submitted five different estimates of the value of … F.Supp. at 800. (Footnote omitted.) Although the extent to which the ongoing deficit operation has impaired the bondholders' security is unclear, it is undeniable that the continued operation of the railroad into the late 1960's, together with … of the New Haven properties. Although the Purchase Agreement "carrie[d] some probative force as to the values of the properties involved, it [was] by no … Penn Central, which was done on December 31, 1968. The bondholders filed objections to the revised evaluation … 212 U. S. 118 , 212 U. S. 126 , 212 U. S. 129 ; Wabash R. … Court sustained the Penn Central merger (389 U.S. 486), it upheld the action of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) in conditioning its approval of the … the questions presented by the complaint herein under Section 5(2) of the Interstate Commerce Act will also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew York Vs. United States
US Supreme Court
Jun-19-1992
Land Acquisition
in "regional compacts" with other States, the obligation to provide for the disposal of waste generated within their borders, and contains three provisions setting forth "incentives" to States to comply with that obligation. The first set of … disposal, even without the prospect of taking title; and since any burden caused by New York's failure to secure a site will not be borne by other States' residents because the sited regional compacts need not accept … Burns ed. 1988). In 1979, both the Washington and Nevada sites were forced to shut down temporarily, leaving South Carolina to shoulder the responsibility of … waste in 31 States, Congress enacted the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, which, among other things, imposes upon States, either alone or … 70-78; Bonfield, The Guarantee Clause of Article IV; Section 4: A Study in Constitutional Desuetude, 46 Minn. … R. 1046, H. R. 1083, and H. R. 1267 before the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »