Advanced Search Results

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

excludes the jurisdiction exercisable by the procedure applicable to Army Act, Navy Act, Air Force Act and the Border Security Act. By such exclusion, the court martial was competent even to make trial of the individual when the … SCC 161). Though it related to Sections 64, 70, 74, 117(1)(2) and 141 of the Border Security Forces Act 1968, the question was whether the court was to give reasons in support of its verdict. Placing reliance on … trial judge Advocate in open Court as to the finding of the court as ascertained in accordance with Section 124. The Navy Act does not deal with drawing up of findings with recorded reasons. This question came up

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Border Security Force'.9. It is true New Rules 7 and 8 have precursors in Old Rules 123 and 124 in that seniority list of Sub-Inspectors had to be maintained 'Statewise' and that of Inspectors 'Frontierwise', under Old

Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730

J. 1. These two appeals : one by the claimant Smt. Kamala Devi and other filed by the Border Security Force, Jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made … that when the well was purchased by the claimant-petitioner in the year 1968, it was only 50 feet deep as stated by P.W. 1 Shri … made on reference by the L.A.O., this D.B. Civil First Appeal No. 124 of 1974 has been filed by the claimant-petitioner Smt. Kamla Devi and … Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act ('the Act' herein). 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this reference briefly stated

N. Bommon Behram and anr. Vs. the Government of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 12 and 18; Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 4(1), 8, 9, 11 and 15A; ;Madras Motor Vehicles Act, 1948 - Sections 43-A; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Evidence Act - Sections 123 and 124

Reported in : AIR1970Kant89; AIR1970Mys89

notified for acquisition under Section 4(1) of the Act. The lands were required for the use of the Border Security Force under the control of the Central Government. Prior to the issue of this Notification on 1-5-1967, there were … directing them not to follow the instructions given in letter No. RD 220 AQB '68 dated 29/30th August 1968 and to issue a mandamus directing them to maintain their own valuation expressed in the draft award dated … from the court.An attempt was made by referring to Sections 123 and 124 of the Evidence Act to contend that since the State Government had

Angou Golmei Vs. Vizovolie Chakha Sang

Court : Patna

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 110, 110(1), 111 and 124; Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulations) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2), 3(3) and 4; Spices Board Act, 1986; Sea Customs Act, 1978 - Sections 178A; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 66; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34

Dimapur they must have been smuggled from outside i.e. across the Indo-Burman border. This case, in that sense, is different from the usual run-of-the mill … Annexure-24, shows (a) on 30th March, 1993 information was received from Assistant Security Commissioner, R.P.F Barauni, regarding illicit movement of cloves and Javitri through railway … Schedule, the Import and Export Policy having statutory force under Section 3(2) of that Act, there cannot … the Income Tax Act, 1961; Section 178A of the Sea Customs Act, 1978; Section 66 of Gold (Control) Act, 1968 and so on. In Calcutta Discound Col. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer (AIR 1961 Supreme Court, 372), a … from whose possession they were seized if no notice in respect thereof is given under clause (a) of Section 124 within six months of the seizure. However, for the purpose of these cases, which relate to the validity

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

that did not have an effective police force, law enforcement often could not pursue criminals beyond the town borders. See Brief for Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al. as Amici Curiae 15. Settlers in the West and … “the right … to have full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings concerning personal liberty, personal security, and the acquisition, enjoyment, and disposition of estate, real and personal, including the constitutional right to bear arms … Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 121 Nev. 867, 124 P. 3d 550 (2005) (no right to jury … this federal suit against the City, which was consolidated with two related actions, alleging that the City’s handgun ban has left them vulnerable to criminals. … i.e., the Equal Protection Clause, it can hardly be said that the section does no more than prohibit discrimination. If what municipal respondents mean is

Surendrakumar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Rajasthan University Act

Reported in : AIR1969Raj182; 1968()WLN192

Matched in: Citation AIR1969Raj182; 1968()WLN192

Burson Vs. Freeman

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the First Amendment. Perhaps foremost among these serious issues are cases that force us to reconcile our commitment to free speech with our commitment to … restrictions on speech are necessary to maintain the freedom to vote and the integrity of the ballot box borders on the absurd. The evidence introduced at trial to demonstrate the necessity for Tennessee's campaign-free zone was exceptionally … sufficiently tailored. A State is not required to prove empirically that an election regulation is perfectly tailored to secure such a compelling interest. Rather, legislatures should be permitted to respond to potential deficiencies in the electoral process … Freeman, while the treasurer for a political campaign in Tennessee, filed an action in the Chancery Court, alleging, among other things, that §2-7-111(b) of the … First and Fourteenth Amendments. Pp. 196-211. (a) The section is a facially content-based restriction on political speech … Crime Victims Bd., 502 U. S. 105 , 124-125 (1991) (opinion concurring in judgment). Under what I

Mississippi Choctaw Indians Vs. Holyfield

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the apparent intention of permanent residency. Many Indian families move back and forth from a reservation dwelling to border communities or even to distant communities, depending on employment Page 490 U. S. 60 and educational opportunities. . … vital to the continued existence and integrity of Indian tribes than their children"), 1902 ("promote the stability and security of Indian tribes"). [ Footnote 23 ] The numerous prerogatives accorded the tribes through the ICWA's substantive provisions, … sponsor in the House, Rep. Morris Udall, see 124 Cong.Rec. 38102 (1978) ("Indian tribes and Indian people … entered in the absence of jurisdiction. [ Footnote 2/12 ] Finally, it forces parents of Indian children who desire to invoke state court jurisdiction to … children, their parents, and their tribes, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA), which, inter alia, gives tribal courts exclusive jurisdiction over … provisions concerning jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings. Section 1911 lays out a dual jurisdictional scheme. Section