Advanced Search Results

Jitender Singh (Ex. Head Const) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 12, 19 and 122; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 20, 22, 22(2), 22(3), 22(4) and 28A and 177; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(93)DRJ108

writ petition is disposed of in the above terms, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 12 - Border Security Force Rules--1969--Rules 28A and 177--Dismissal for overstaying from leave--Administrative order--No enquiry conducted--Non compliance … leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 12 - Border Security Force Rules--1969--Rules 28A and 177--Dismissal for overstaying from … are illustrative and not exhaustive), we are of the opinion that the expiry of period of limitation under Section 122 of the Act does not ipso facto take away the exercise of power under Section 19 read with

Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001(1)WLN135

of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance … and Ram Narain, residents of village 15-H. On 31st July, 1988, P.W. 18 Shri B.P. Ingley, Deputy Commandant, 122 Battalion, Border Security Force, lodged an F.I.R. Ex.D.8 at 9 A.M. at Police Station, Ghadsana stating inter alia

Ram Ashray Prasad Dwivedi Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner argued that the petitioner is charged for having committed an offence punishable under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. He refers to the provision of 3 Section 20(a) and argues that the said provision only pertains to … defense witnesses, denial of the same by the petitioner and further invites my attention to Rule 157 and 122 of the Rules o”6. and argues that friend of the accused is only permitted under the statutory rules

Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and or ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1997(1)WLC518; 1996(1)WLN466

Judge enhancing the compensation from Rs. 1,30,912.96p. to Rs. 2,31,967.71p., the State filed S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 122 of 1979 against the excessive quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Civil Judge; the Border Security Force, … 1622 and 1625 situated on Mandore Road, Jodhpur was acquired by the State Government for the purpose of Border Security Force. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, 'the Act') that the land is needed

B.S.F. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1995(1)WLC48; 1994(2)WLN74

the aforesaid appeals by a common judgment, by which the appeals filed by the State of Rajasthan and Border Security Force (appellant) were dismissed, whereas the appeal filed by the claimants was allowed. Being aggrieved with the said judgment, … of the Land Acquisition Officer, the claimants moved for a reference Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the 'Act'), before the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur, who modified the Award passed by the Land … claimants-respondents filed C.M.A. No. 104/1979, the State of Rajasthan filed C.M.A. Nos. 122/1979 and 125/1979, before this Court. The learned Single Judge, vide his judgment

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … to adequate opportunity to defend the charges raised before this court, reference requires to be made to Rule 122 and 123 which applies to the General or Petty Security Force Courts and reads as follows:- "122. Defending

Border Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2(2) and 3; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4

BSF vesting in the Central Government by virtue of what has been stated in Section 4 of the Border Security Force Act inasmuch as Commission of Enquiry is a fact finding body and by appointing such a Commission no control … The Central Government can suo motu deploy the force in any State.' 15. The BSF Act 47 of 1968 and the rules promulgated under the Act were heavily relied in support of the writ petitions therefore we … Mahratta Railway Co. v. Bezwada Municipality, 71 Ind App 113 at p 122 : AIR 1944 PC 71 at p 73, where the sphere of

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

that did not have an effective police force, law enforcement often could not pursue criminals beyond the town borders. See Brief for Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al. as Amici Curiae 15. Settlers in the West and … “the right … to have full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings concerning personal liberty, personal security, and the acquisition, enjoyment, and disposition of estate, real and personal, including the constitutional right to bear arms … (internal quotation marks omitted))); see also Sklansky, Anti-Inquisitorialism, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1634, 1648-1656, 1689-1693 (2009) (discussing … this federal suit against the City, which was consolidated with two related actions, alleging that the City’s handgun ban has left them vulnerable to criminals. … i.e., the Equal Protection Clause, it can hardly be said that the section does no more than prohibit discrimination. If what municipal respondents mean is

District of Columbia Vs. Heller

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

meaning of the Second Amendment. A The Second Amendment provides: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” … Writings of Samuel Adams 299 (H. Cushing ed. 1968). They understood the right to enable individuals to … the Constitution of the United States of America 122 (1825) (hereinafter Rawle). It was clearly an individual … Distinction Between Words Esteemed Synonymous in the English Language 37 (1794) (emphasis added). Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second … 103-106. These experiences caused Englishmen to be extremely wary of concentrated military forces run by the state and to be jealous of their arms. They … of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal … the Freedmen’s Bureau Act on July 16, 1866. Section 14 stated: “[T]he right … to have full

New York Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

in "regional compacts" with other States, the obligation to provide for the disposal of waste generated within their borders, and contains three provisions setting forth "incentives" to States to comply with that obligation. The first set of … disposal, even without the prospect of taking title; and since any burden caused by New York's failure to secure a site will not be borne by other States' residents because the sited regional compacts need not accept … Burns ed. 1988). In 1979, both the Washington and Nevada sites were forced to shut down temporarily, leaving South Carolina to shoulder the responsibility of … waste in 31 States, Congress enacted the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, which, among other things, imposes upon States, either alone or … 70-78; Bonfield, The Guarantee Clause of Article IV; Section 4: A Study in Constitutional Desuetude, 46 Minn. … A Theory of Judicial Review 118, n., and 122-123 (1980); W. Wiecek, The Guarantee Clause of the