Advanced Search Results

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 23 and 48; Indian Penal Code; Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Act

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

of the first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.'Since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under Section 23 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968

Jitender Singh (Ex. Head Const) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 12, 19 and 122; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 20, 22, 22(2), 22(3), 22(4) and 28A and 177; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(93)DRJ108

writ petition is disposed of in the above terms, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 12 - Border Security Force Rules--1969--Rules 28A and 177--Dismissal for overstaying from leave--Administrative order--No enquiry conducted--Non compliance … of in the above terms, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 12 - Border Security Force Rules--1969--Rules 28A and 177--Dismissal for overstaying from leave--Administrative order--No enquiry conducted--Non compliance of … apply their mind to this most pertinent aspect of the case.8. Under Section 19(a) of the BSF Act, 'absent without leave' is an offence which

B.V. Ramnarayan Vs. State Bank of India, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Rule 92; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2)

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT753; (1997)ILLJ1007AP

in the Border Security Force was dismissed from service by the Commandant acting under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 on the ground that he was a deserter, without holding enquiry. Before the Supreme Court, the questions were … he was described as an Officer of the bank in the call letters sent to him on March 12, 1984 and January 21, 1985 for consideration of his candidature for promotion to MM scale III. Further, the

Comdt. Atul Kumar Singh Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Section 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

the finding and sentence of the Security Force Court in terms of the provisions of Section 107 of Border Security Force Act, 1968. 20. Aggrieved by the finding and sentence awarded by the Security Force Court which stood confirmed by the … Officer. Witness further states that this welding, denting and painting work was not found done on the vehicle. 12. Raj Sekhar Bhattacharya PW-7, deposed that he is the owner of Raj Automobiles situated in Dharmanagar. On 03.12.2004

Gurdip Singh Bath Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

had absented himself from duty without leave and therefore, had committed an offence unde Section 18 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, (hereinafter referred to as 'the BSF Act') because he was declared a deserter. For such serious allegations as … further rider that no further extension in leave shall be granted. The petitioner was informed, vide letter dated 12.10.1993 (Annexure-R-2) that his voluntary retirement notice cannot be accepted, while he was on leave. The petitioner did not

S. S. Rana vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

October, 1990.13. On 31st January, 1994, the... Petitioner was issued a charge-sheet under Section 30 (b) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) alleging that while performing the duties of Quarter Master on 27th October, 1990, he conspired with … background facts are that the... Petitioner was, in the year 1990, working as a Quarter Master of the 123rd Battalion of the Border Security Force („BSF‟) having been entrusted that duty by the Commandant of the WP

Deepak Kumar Shukla vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India assailing order dated 02.12.2023, passed by the Commandant, 118 Battalion, Border Security Force, whereby the Petitioner was dismissed from service and consequently praying for reinstatement into service.Signing Date:16.04.2026 Page 1 of … five charges against the Petitioner were as follows:“ FIRST CHARGE : AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDERAND BSF ACT 1968 DISCIPLINE OF THE FORCE UNDER in that he, SECTION 40 in between 13.09.2022 to 13.01.2023 whiledeployed at BOP

Atul Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19, 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : 2002(5)SLR618

India through proper channel for acceptance of his resignation from service in terms of Section 8 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act and Rules). In response to the

Laxman Chandra Sarkar Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 21(2)

be permissible under the proviso to Sub-Rule 1 of Rule 41 of the Pension Rules. 17. No costs. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 21(2) - Disobedience to superior officer -- Enrolled on 20.12.1973 as a Constable (Radio Mechanic) in BSF, petitioner

Dharambir Singh (Ex. Const.) Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC). The findings and punishment were approved by the Competent Authority of the Border Security Force (BSF) on 05.03.1999; the petitioners appeal was rejected on 22.11.1999.2. Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner who … A. Ghosh. The charge sheet initially issued against the petitioner were as follows: CHARGE SHEET U/S 5.OF BSF ACT No.89499341 CT/DVR DHARAMBIR SINGH OF 16.BN BSF IS CHARGED WITH:CHARGE-I BSF ACT 1968.SECTION-40 AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD … COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 1260/2000 DHARAMBIR SINGH (EX. CONST.) ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Anil Gautam, Advocate.