Advanced Search Results

Border Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2(2) and 3; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4

BSF vesting in the Central Government by virtue of what has been stated in Section 4 of the Border Security Force Act inasmuch as Commission of Enquiry is a fact finding body and by appointing such a Commission no control … The Central Government can suo motu deploy the force in any State.' 15. The BSF Act 47 of 1968 and the rules promulgated under the Act were heavily relied in support of the writ petitions therefore we … what sentences can be imposed is set out. In Chapter IX Sections 119 to 138 deal with revision applications. In Chapter X miscellaneous matters are

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Rule 149 of the BSF Rules, 1969 or by the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. In the said case, the Supreme Court had carefully examined the provisions of Rule 149 of the Border … the sentence of imprisonment in order to file a petition against the finding and sentence in terms of Section 119 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978. The petitioner also sought a copy of the Coast Guard Court proceedings

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Rules, according to para 7 of the return, is 'directory' and it is also claimed that under Rule 119, the 'headquarter' had not to do anything. The competent authority to promote Sub-Inspector was Deputy Inspector General.5. What

Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730

J. 1. These two appeals : one by the claimant Smt. Kamala Devi and other filed by the Border Security Force, Jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made … that when the well was purchased by the claimant-petitioner in the year 1968, it was only 50 feet deep as stated by P.W. 1 Shri … Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act ('the Act' herein). 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this reference briefly stated

Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and or ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1997(1)WLC518; 1996(1)WLN466

1622 and 1625 situated on Mandore Road, Jodhpur was acquired by the State Government for the purpose of Border Security Force. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, 'the Act') that the land is needed

Samir Bhattacharya and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 38, 39 and 226; ;West Bengal State Tax on Professions, Callings and Employments Act, 1979

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT333(HC)

the writ petitioners who joined West Bengal Home Guard service do not come under the purview of the Border Security Force Act and Rules and their grievances are matters concerning the State Government alone. It is further stated that the … Officer appointed under Act V of 1861.' This Act V of 1861 is the Police Act, 1861 and Section 8 thereof says :'Every police officer appointed to the police force than an officer mentioned in Section 4 … Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court (Agartala Bench) in C.R. No. 119 of 1981 (Ratanlal Duttta v. State of Tripura and Ors.) (unreported) where

Satnarain Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

preparation of record of evidence. On considering the ROE the petitioner was directed to be tried at Summary Security Force Court. Chargesheet was drawn and petitioner was charged as under :“BSF ACT-1968 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT SECTION-46 … posted in 52 Battalion, BSF on January 06, 2009. During February 2011 the petitioner was deployed at Indo-Bangladesh Border at BOP Rajanagar of ‘A’ Coy of 52 Battalion BSF when certain cases against unit personnel were noticed

United States Vs. Sioux Nation of Indians

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

a tract of land bounded on the east by the Missouri River, on the south by the northern border of the State of Nebraska, on the north by the forty-sixth parallel of north latitude, and on the … which may be held in common shall be of any validity or force as against the said Indians, unless executed and signed by at least … the Indians and the Government. Finally, in October, 1968, the Commission set down three questions for briefing … United States v. Klamath Indians, 304 U. S. 119 , 304 U. S. 123 (1938); United States … influx of settlers into the Black Hills increased. The Government concluded that the only practical course was to secure to the citizens of the United States the right to mine the Black Hills for gold. Toward Page … as long as they would be needed. In 1877, Congress passed an Act (1877 Act) implementing this "agreement" and thus, in effect, abrogated the Fort

Boumediene Vs. Bush

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

impose detention to prevent acts of terrorism, the courts must accord proper deference to the political branches. However, security subsists, too, in fidelity to freedom’s first principles, chief among them being freedom from arbitrary and unlawful restraint … 5, 2007-Decided June 12, 2008* In the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Congress empowered the President “to use all necessary and appropriate force … and Customs of England 33 (S. Thorne transl. 1968) (“The king must not be under man but … statute, the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA), 119 Stat. 2739, that provides certain procedures for review … Bay. The Government contends that noncitizens designated as enemy combatants and detained in territory located outside our Nation’s borders have no constitutional rights and no privilege of habeas corpus. Petitioners contend they do have cognizable constitutional rights … the detainees had no rights that could be vindicated in a habeas action. In the second, the judge held that the detainees had due process … were pending at the time of its enactment. Section §7(b)’s effective date provision undoubtedly applies to habeas

Nirmal Dey and anr. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Tripura Home Guard Rules, 1962

Tripura are nothing but an auxiliary force and their functions are to assist the police in maintaining internal security and to discharge such other duties as may be assigned to them under the Rules. It is contended … that he has been appointed as Guardsman. It is averred that Guardsmen are used to be enrolled in Border Wing Home Guards Battalion and not in Home Guards Organisation. The Border Wing Home Guards came in existence … The first decision is of Civil Rule No. 119 of 1981. This judgment shows that the petitioner … of the Home Guards for Tripura State under the Bombay Home Guards Act, 1947.8. It is further contended that concept of creating a voluntary organisation … the Bombay Home Guards Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.) Section 2(1) of the Act envisages that the Chief Commissioner shall constitute for