Advanced Search Results

Constable No. 860020697, Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India Through t ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 117;

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC783; (2000)1UPLBEC687

petition has been filed by one Constable, Rama Kant Shukla, serving in Border Security Force. Admittedly, provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968, are applicable to the facts of the present case. Petitioner was serving somewhere in the State of Jammu … arisen within territorial jurisdiction of this Court and secondly petitioner has an adequate and efficacious remedy available under Section 117 Border Security Force Act, 1968.6. I have heard Sri A. N. Tripathi. learned counsel for the petitioner and

Union of India and Another Vs. Ex Constable Amrik Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4, 87, 107, 117 (2) and 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 217, 226 and 227; Army Act, 1959 - Sections 164(2); Border Security Force Rules - Rules 167 to 169

Reported in : AIR1991SC564; 1991CriLJ664; JT1991(1)SC282; 1991(1)SCALE91; (1991)1SCC654; [1991]1SCR182; 1991(1)LC684(SC); (1991)1UPLBEC325

J.1. Whether a personal hearing is required before disposing of a petition filed under Section 117(2) of The Border Security Force Act, 1968 ('Act' for short) against an order of the Summary Security Force Court? This in short is the question

Mahender Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 117; Border Security Force Rules - Rule 116

Reported in : 142(2007)DLT371; 2007(95)DRJ342

further documents including copies of the judgments which he relies upon within two weeks from today. No costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 117 - Statutory Petition--Article 226 of Constitution of India--Challenged the orders passed by Director General, BSF--Seeking directions … his conviction and sentence, the petitioner filed a statutory petition in terms of Section 117 of the BSF Act, 1968 before the Director General, BSF on 30th June, 2004. On receipt of the said petition, the petitioner was

Constable Basavaraj Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 117 and 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 311; Border Security Force Rules

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR468]; ILR2005KAR3513

Petitioner from service on the ground that he was found guilty of charge under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act').2. The Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-(a) to quash the order of dismissal … B S F dated 7.10.2001 (Annexure-A). After filing the Writ Petition the Appeal made by the petitioner under Section 117(2) of the Act was rejected and communicated the same by letter dated 27th of February 2002 (Annexure-K).5. The

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … writ petition before this Court was relegated to avail alternative remedy of appeal available to the petitioner under Section 117 of the Act.5. The appeal of the petitioner was a success, in the sense, the appellate authority while

Lavito Sema Vs. Union of India

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

order dated 6.7.09 (Annexure-XXXI), by which the Govt. of India in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General, Border Security Force has rejected the petition submitted by the petitioner against the aforesaid orders. The orders so passed is pursuant … filed by the petitioner against the order of confirmation under the provisions of Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968. (2.) The petitioner while was serving as Head Constable in BSF, he was tried by a GSFC in

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … to supply copy of the S.S.F.C. proceedings. The appellant was also granted liberty to file a petition under Section 117 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968. The appellant submitted the necessary petition. This petition has also been dismissed by

In Re: for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … to supply copy of the S.S.F.C. proceedings. The appellant was also granted liberty to file a petition under Section 117 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968. The appellant submitted the necessary petition. This petition has also been dismissed by

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

resisted by the respondents on the grounds that the petitioner has not exhausted the statutory remedy provided under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with Rule 167 of the BSF Rules, 1969, which is … of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could not be established and a fresh charge under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for committing offence in terms of Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 came to be

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 17, 46, 64, 70, 70(1), 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 70(5), 74, 117, 117(2) and 141; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 165; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 99, 99(1) and 133 to 161; Army Rules - Rule 66(1)

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE396

the High Court directed remand in all the matters to the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) for rewriting the order, giving reasons in support of the