Advanced Search Results
Head Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-11-2000
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 227; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 107 and 108; Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rule 48; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 304A; Evidence Act - Sections 24
2000CriLJ2585
months from the receipt of the Court order. The respondents defended the vires of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 and contended that the same were in accordance with the provisions … punishment in contravention of the powers of the confirming authority under sections 111 and 116(3) of the Act. In ground 59(p), the petitioner alleged that … the charge-sheet dated 14th May, 1992. The charge-sheet was served on the petitioner for committing civil offence under Section 46 of the BSF Act, i.e. the offence of murder, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRabindranath Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Orissa
Sep-26-2007
Constitution
AIR2008Ori19
ghaty receive such pay, pension and other remuneration, as may be prescribed.There are also similar provision in the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 etc.14. In the case of Akhilesh Prasad v. Union Territory of … CISF, Assam Rifles, Indo-Tibetan Border Security Force, S.S. B. Security Force and Rapid Action Force. In this regard, Section 3 of the C.R.P.F. Act 1949, is liable to be perused. The same is reproduced as under:3. Constitution
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUniversal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Sep-07-2006
Intellectual Property Rights
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),
[2008]87SCL51(Delhi)
and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … petitioners, they have been constrained to file a composite petition under Section 397, 398, 402 as well as Section 111 (4) of the Companies Act, 1956 being Company petition No. 21/2005. Vide an order passed on 16th March,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-26-2000
Service
2000(2)WLN635
the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … of sentence. Section 107 prohibits operation of the sentence of finding unless confirmed as provided under the Act. Section 111 empower the confirming Authority to confirm the sentence awarded by the Force Court or remit the matter on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBorder Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.
Guwahati
Oct-07-1988
Constitution
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2(2) and 3; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4
Matched in: Parties Border Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatnarain Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Delhi
Feb-25-2015
Education
preparation of record of evidence. On considering the ROE the petitioner was directed to be tried at Summary Security Force Court. Chargesheet was drawn and petitioner was charged as under :“BSF ACT-1968 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT SECTION-46 … posted in 52 Battalion, BSF on January 06, 2009. During February 2011 the petitioner was deployed at Indo-Bangladesh Border at BOP Rajanagar of ‘A’ Coy of 52 Battalion BSF when certain cases against unit personnel were noticed … S/o Shri Dadi Ram r/o B-303 B, Kirari S M P Nagar 111, New Delhi-41 in his bank A/C No.30026832947 at SBI Mundka, (Code No.6814)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAngou Golmei Vs. Vizovolie Chakha Sang
Patna
Apr-22-1994
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 110, 110(1), 111 and 124; Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulations) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2), 3(3) and 4; Spices Board Act, 1986; Sea Customs Act, 1978 - Sections 178A; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 66; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34
Dimapur they must have been smuggled from outside i.e. across the Indo-Burman border. This case, in that sense, is different from the usual run-of-the mill … Annexure-24, shows (a) on 30th March, 1993 information was received from Assistant Security Commissioner, R.P.F Barauni, regarding illicit movement of cloves and Javitri through railway … Schedule, the Import and Export Policy having statutory force under Section 3(2) of that Act, there cannot … the Income Tax Act, 1961; Section 178A of the Sea Customs Act, 1978; Section 66 of Gold (Control) Act, 1968 and so on. In Calcutta Discound Col. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer (AIR 1961 Supreme Court, 372), a … the meaning of Section 11 of the Customs Act. The cloves are, thus, undoubtedly liable to confiscation under Section 111 of the Customs Act unless, of course, they are found to be indigenous.7. Although in the show cause
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.A. Rangaswami and ors. Vs. AmIn Chand Payarelal Firm, Bombay
Mumbai
Mar-09-1978
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(25), 2(33), 11, 11(1), 111, 112 and 125; Imports (Control) Order, 1955; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4A and 5; Indian Partnership Act; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 19, 167 and 167(8); Imports and Exports (Control) Amendment Ordinance, 1975; Imports and Exports (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1976
AIR1979Bom130; (1978)80BOMLR250
supply of 555 tons of galvanised plain sheets with a stipulation that the goods should cross the Hungarian border on or before 28th February 1962. The shipment was to be effected from any European port. On 3rd … of the amount deposited by them in this Court by way of security for costs, There will be an order accordingly.37. Mr. Joshi has drawn … under this Act or any other law for the time being in force; XXX XXX XXX' (underlining supplied). 11. Section 112 provides for penalty for … of Customs') and the order dated 11th October 1968 passed by the 2nd appellant (hereinafter referred to … Appraiser, Special Investigation Branch, calling upon the petitioners to explain why these goods should not be confiscated under section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962, read with section 3 (2) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAllen Vs. State Bd. of Elections
US Supreme Court
Mar-03-1969
Land Acquisition
standard, practice, or procedure with respect to voting different from that in force or effect on November 1, 1964," without first submitting the change to … Board of Elections No. 3 Argued October 15, 1968 Decided March 3, 1969 * 393 U.S. 544 … in Swift Co. v. Wickham, 382 U. S. 111 , 382 U. S. 127 (1965), that a … a majority of those participating in said election." "[bb]Provided further, however, that in any county in the state bordering on the Gulf of Mexico or Mississippi Sound and having a population in excess of eighty thousand (80,000) … November 1, 1964," without first submitting the change to the U.S. Attorney General and obtaining his consent or securing a favorable declaratory judgment from the District Court for the District of Columbia. In Nos. 25, 26, and … DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Syllabus Pursuant to § 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 the provisions of § 4(a), suspending all "tests or devices" … § 5 of the Act, even though that section was not argued below. P. 393 U. S.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. Sioux Nation of Indians
US Supreme Court
Jun-30-1980
Land Acquisition
a tract of land bounded on the east by the Missouri River, on the south by the northern border of the State of Nebraska, on the north by the forty-sixth parallel of north latitude, and on the … which may be held in common shall be of any validity or force as against the said Indians, unless executed and signed by at least … the Indians and the Government. Finally, in October, 1968, the Commission set down three questions for briefing … United States v. Shoshone Tribe, 304 U. S. 111 , 304 U. S. 115 -116 (1938); Shoshone … influx of settlers into the Black Hills increased. The Government concluded that the only practical course was to secure to the citizens of the United States the right to mine the Black Hills for gold. Toward Page … as long as they would be needed. In 1877, Congress passed an Act (1877 Act) implementing this "agreement" and thus, in effect, abrogated the Fort
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »