Advanced Search Results
Mohinder Singh Malik and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Jammu and Kashmir
Mar-20-2002
Service
Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 9 and 14A; ;Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) (Amendment) Rules, 1998; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
2003(3)JKJ73
dated 27.5.1998, purportingly issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, Rule 9 of the 1978 Rules was amended so as to provide for the age of superannuation of … ranks for the purpose of the age of superannuation is unjust, un-fair and un-reasonable. Appellant further submitted that 110 such classification is maintained in any Civil Service, including a police force. The recommendations of the Fifty Pay
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Dattusingh Rathod Vs. The Union Of India
Karnataka
Oct-22-2020
Land Acquisition
the fact that the order of penalty of dismissal from service was appealable under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the … AND1 THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE, 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK No.10, C.G.O. COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr P S Venkatesh Vs. The Secretary
Karnataka
May-24-2021
Land Acquisition
‘the said Rules’ for short). These Rules are framed under sub Section (2) of Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It cannot, therefore, be in doubt that the Rules are statutes. The Rule that is germane for consideration … SUNIL KUMAR H., ADVOCATE (VIDEO CONFERENCING)]. AND1 THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI - 110 001.2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BSF BLOCK NO.10, CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI - 110 003. 23. THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...
Mumbai
Mar-24-2004
Criminal
2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98
of 1950), the Air Force Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 11968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 … service) available. Such opinion shall be recorded in the convening order.(3) In 110 case shall an officer below the rank of captain be a member … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-02-1978
Constitution
1978(11)WLN435
working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General … through letter dated 29 10 1977. This letter was annexed with the copy of letter No. D. IX 110/77 (R & G)/24343-44 dated 24-10-1977 from the Head quarters Inspector General, Border Security Force (R & G), Jodhpur,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx-Constable Subhash Singh vs.government of India & Anr
Delhi
Sep-25-2019
Land Acquisition
the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) of the offences under Sections 19 (a) and 22 (e) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act) and sentencing him to be dismissed from service. He has also challenged the order dated 13th … declined to do so.9. There were two charges framed against the... Petitioner which read thus: “Charge -I BSF Act 1968 Section 19 (a) Absenting himself without leave In that/he having been relieved of his duties at OP No.48 on … hand in the decisions reported as Chokha Ram v Union of India 110 (2004) DLT268and Diwan Bhai v Union of India MANU/DE/1823/2001 it was held
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHead Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-11-2000
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 227; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 107 and 108; Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rule 48; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 304A; Evidence Act - Sections 24
2000CriLJ2585
months from the receipt of the Court order. The respondents defended the vires of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 and contended that the same were in accordance with the provisions … the warrants issued by the Central Government as also Sections 108 and 110 of the Act. In para 59(o) the petitioner took the plea that … the charge-sheet dated 14th May, 1992. The charge-sheet was served on the petitioner for committing civil offence under Section 46 of the BSF Act, i.e. the offence of murder, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahender Singh (Ex. Const) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
May-12-2008
Civil
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 117; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 142 and 142(2)
2008(104)DRJ749
tenor of what is recorded is almost verbatim of what is required as per Rule 142 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Rules'). Rule 142 reads as under:142. General plea of 'Guilty' … to consider afresh the statutory petition filed by the petitioner in terms of Section 117 of the BSF Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act') and pass appropriate orders, The Director General, BSF was also directed … this Court in Chokha Ram v. Union of India and Anr. : 110 (2004) DLT 268 : 2004 (73) DRJ 450 and that there is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2024
Right to Information
[2024]12S.C.R.202
27.04.1974 which entrusted functions of customs officer to police officers in a particular jurisdiction and officers of the Border Security Force respectively. However, in the case of DRI officers, they would clearly fall under Sections 3, 4 and 5 … Functions of the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India “, 4th Edition, 1968, pages 68-70 (Annexure R XIII). As the work of Directorates of Inspection … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements, … the Finance Act, 2022 introduced a new Section 110AA and a validation enactment respectively. These amendments came
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Devi Lal Sahu
Rajasthan
Apr-01-2010
Service
leave. The writ-petitioner submitted that on 28.10.2003, he was served with a charge-sheet under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 ('the BSF Act') and was placed under close arrest at Headquarter 20 Bn. Barmer on 29.10.2003; and that … and Ors. CW No. 4687/2001, decided on 04.09.2001 and Chokha Ram v. Union of India and Anr. : 110 (2004) Delhi Law Times 268 (DB).12. Per contra, the learned Counsel for the respondent, while supporting the order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »