Advanced Search Results

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … record its decision thereon and on any sentence and any order which the Court may have made under Section 105 on the record of the proceedings in the appropriate form set out in Appendix VIII and such record

K.P. Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 105

Reported in : 51(1993)DLT670; 1993(27)DRJ65

the petitioner within a period of two months from today.(5) There will be no order as to costs. BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT - Section 105--petitioner charged with allegation of bribing his superior-acquitted in Court Marshall-Amount recovered from petitioner can not

Head Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 107 and 108; Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rule 48; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 304A; Evidence Act - Sections 24

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2585

months from the receipt of the Court order. The respondents defended the vires of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 and contended that the same were in accordance with the provisions … passed and award the sentence afresh as provided in the BSF Rule 105. 3. The GSFC was re-assembled on 22-9-1992 at Mamdot and revoked its … the charge-sheet dated 14th May, 1992. The charge-sheet was served on the petitioner for committing civil offence under Section 46 of the BSF Act, i.e. the offence of murder, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was … 9-3-1999 (221 days) as Dies Non is under challenge in the present petition. While working as Constable in 105 Bn. Of the Border Security Force, petitioner left for his home in 1999. It is alleged that he

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … New Delhi, AIR 1986 SC 1060, wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court held:-'Sections 38 and 39 and Sections 104 and 105 make a clear distinction between 'desertion' and 'absence without leave', and Section 106 prescribes the procedure to be

Janardan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Navy Act 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

in Force Custody and reduced his rank from Head Constable to Constable.16. As per Section 107 of The Border Security Force Act 1968 a finding or sentence by a Security Force Court has to be confirmed and a revision also lies … pass the sentence afresh.7. The accused shall be given an opportunity to address the court and BSF Rule 105 should be complied with.8. The proceedings after revision shall be forwarded to the Chief Law Officer, HQ DG

Ravi Paul and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 8, 113(3) and 116; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 4, 141(1), 141(2) and 142; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 9 and 14(2); Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment Rules, 1969; Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment (Repeal) Rules, 1973; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : JT1995(1)SC579; 1995LabIC405; 1995(1)SCALE261; (1995)3SCC300; [1995]1SCR419; 1995(2)SLJ205(SC); 1995(1)LC571(SC)

Assistant Principal Central Training College in the Central Reserve Police Force. On September 2, 1968, Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BSF Act') to provide for the Constitution and regulation of an armed force … Union for ensuring the security of the borders of India and for matters connected therewith. Sub-section (1) of Section 141 of the BSF Act empowers the Central Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into … provision was contained in Clauses (iv) introduced in Sub-rule (4) of Rule 105 of the CRPF Rules which provided for appointment to the post of

Ravi Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32

Provisions relating to Border Security Force was inserted in the CRPF Rules. On 02.09.1968 the Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act 1968, to provide for the constitution and regulation of an Armed Force of the Union for ensuring the safety … Government constituted Central Police Reserve Force (hereinafter referred to as the „CRPF). By virtue of the provisions of Section 18 of the Central Police Reserve Force Act 1949, the Central Government made „Central Reserve Police Force Rules … of the officer and the requirement of the Indian Army. 4. Rule 105 of the CRPF Rules deal with appointment and promotion of officers in

U.B.S. Teotil and ors. Vs. Union of Inida and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 18; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 8

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi225B; 1978LabIC1225

Force, however, was initially regulated by the Act and the Rules framed there under until Parliament passed the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (Act 47 of 1968), for short, B.S.F. Act. By virtue of the provisions of Section 18 of the … Police Force Rules, 1955, for short the Rules, inter alia, to regulate the functioning of the Force. Rule 105 of the Rules provides for appointment and promotion of superior officers. -Until the year 1966, when Rule 105

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under