Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 104 · Page 1 of about 28 results (0.018 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 03 1996

Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and or ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-03-1996

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1997(1)WLC518; 1996(1)WLN466

Matched in: Parties Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1999

Suresh Lal Koul Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Dec-14-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 84; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 67, 65(1), 65(4); ;Constitution of India - Articles 104, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ423

O.P. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner a Sub-Inspector in the Border Security Force was tried by a General Security Force Court for committing extortion. He was found guilty of having committed … of Code of Criminal Procedure. It is also challenged on the plea that Section 84 of the BSF Act has not been complied with, vitiate the proceedings of the General Security Force Court.5. The stand of the … not subject to Superintendence of the High Court under Article 227 or 104 of the State Constitution. If a Court-Martial is properly convened and there

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2003

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Aug-13-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … Army Staff, New Delhi, AIR 1986 SC 1060, wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court held:-'Sections 38 and 39 and Sections 104 and 105 make a clear distinction between 'desertion' and 'absence without leave', and Section 106 prescribes the procedure

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 12 2013

Ex. Const. Kailash Chander Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner, who is a serving employee of the Border Security Force (BSF), challenges his dismissal order made on 9.9.2005, pursuant to an incident which is alleged to have occurred … deposition are as follows: No. 99722675 CT Mahabir Singh (Hindu), A Coy, 104 Bn BSF, Kalyani after being duly affirmed [Sec-85(2)], is examined by the … be relevant to reproduce the charges leveled against the petitioner; they are extracted as below: IST CHARGE BSF ACT 1968.SEC-26 INTOXICATION in that he, at Bangoan on 05.09.05 at 1400 hrs was found in a state of … proceedings after the conclusion of evidence, akin to the statement made under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The extract of the statement is as follows: Answer by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2017

Ex. Ct. Madan Mohan vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-20-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

sentenced to dismissal from service vide Annexure P-5 (Colly) as well as Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force letter dated Feb 2005, upholding the said findings and sentence. W.P. (C) 4810/2015 Page 1 of 28 (ii) … was appointed though, no affirming of the interpreter, as required under Rules 134 and 136 of the BSF Act, 1968 and Rules, 1969 was carried out; (ii) petitioner was not provided with the copy of statement of witnesses; … For certain acts, the petitioner was proceeded by SSFC on charges under Section 20(b), 20(c), 19(f) and 26 of the BSF Act, which resulted in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1994

B.S.F. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-07-1994

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1995(1)WLC48; 1994(2)WLN74

the aforesaid appeals by a common judgment, by which the appeals filed by the State of Rajasthan and Border Security Force (appellant) were dismissed, whereas the appeal filed by the claimants was allowed. Being aggrieved with the said judgment, … of the Land Acquisition Officer, the claimants moved for a reference Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the 'Act'), before the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur, who modified the Award passed by the Land … 11.2.1988, by which learned Single Judge allowed S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 104/1979, filed by the respondents No. 4 and 5 i.e. the claimants.2. Brief

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2012

Devender Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-2012

Subject : Education

by this Court be paid within four weeks. With these directions and observations, the writ petition is allowed. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 22-E and 40 - Difference between “misconduct reinstatement” and illegal termination - misconduct reinstatement refers to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2012

Vimal Chandra Mishra Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petitioner was appointed as Class IV Staff Cook with the Border WP(C) No.104/2012 Page 1 of 10 Security Force on the basis of the proceedings taken by the Commandant, Headquarter 11 Bn. BSF, Panjipara, West Dinajpur, West … of 10 April, 2005, the Court of Inquiry was conducted in accordance with Section 62 of the BSF Act, 1968. A show cause notice was also issued to the petitioner but he did not respond to the same..11.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2011

Walumba Lumba (Previously Referred to as Wl) (Congo) 1 and 2 (Appellan ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

document entitled "Bail Proposal for Foreign National Prisoners" in which she said: "Since April 2006, the BIA [("the Border and Immigration Agency")] has been applying a near blanket ban on release, regardless of whether removal can be … is evolving and that there might be compelling reasons not to publish some policies, for example, where national security issues are in play. Nor is it necessary to publish details which are irrelevant to the substance of … (1) Where a recommendation for deportation made by a court is in force in respect of any person, and that person is not detained in … the completion of their sentences of imprisonment. Section 3(5)(a) of the Immigration Act 1971 ("the 1971 Act") provides that a person who is not a … of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888, [2003] INLR 196 para 46 correctly encapsulates

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial