Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 103 · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 2004

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Apr-19-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer … ORDERV.K. Jhanji, J.1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, challenge is to order No. Estt/56 BN/DISC/94/7472-84 dated 9.6.1984, passed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2013

Dharambir Singh (Ex. Const.) Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-05-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC). The findings and punishment were approved by the Competent Authority of the Border Security Force (BSF) on 05.03.1999; the petitioners appeal was rejected on 22.11.1999.2. Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner who … A. Ghosh. The charge sheet initially issued against the petitioner were as follows: CHARGE SHEET U/S 5.OF BSF ACT No.89499341 CT/DVR DHARAMBIR SINGH OF 16.BN BSF IS CHARGED WITH:CHARGE-I BSF ACT 1968.SECTION-40 AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2021

Mr P S Venkatesh Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-24-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

‘the said Rules’ for short). These Rules are framed under sub Section (2) of Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It cannot, therefore, be in doubt that the Rules are statutes. The Rule that is germane for consideration … of India [(1994) 6 SCC98:1994. SCC (L&S) 1304 : (1994) 28 ATC246 this Court reiterated that: (SCC p. 103, para6) “6. … the scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a government servant to an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 2003

Dr. Amar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-25-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rule, 1983 - Rule 4; Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rules 1953 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2004P& H67; (2003)135PLR348

of death of such persons their widows and in theabsence of widows their children.Two per cent(iii) Defence personnel Border Security Force Personnel, Memberof the Central Reserve Police Force, Ex-Servicemen and War Widows havingdomicile in the State of Punjab.Eight per … in the case of New Public School v. HUDA? J.T. 1996(7) S.C. 103. In addition 5% of the plots were reserved for the discretionary quota … 29.9.1995 of 10 sites for shop-cum-flats without holding the draw of lots. Petitioner No. 4 challenged the aforesaid action of the respondents in a Civil Suit and sought permanent injunction against the Trust restraining it from holding … are so framed so as to cater to the persons of all sections of Society.4. In paragraph 25 of the writ petition, it is stated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2010

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails … accused under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.65. On the same issue, in 2003 II AD (Delhi) 103 Lachhman (Ex. Rect.) v. Union of India and Ors. it was held :13. The record of the proceedings

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2006

Const. Hans Raj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act - Sections 87, 74, 99, 117, 117(2), 139 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 148, 149 , 167 to 169; ;Army Act, 1958 - Sections 116; ;Army Rules - Rules 62, 103 to 133 and 133-161; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 378(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 33, 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(87)DRJ108

issue involved in these group of petitions is whether in an order passed under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act(hereinafter referred to as the `BSF Act') in dealing with appeals against the orders of Security Force Court and … Summary Court Martial is held under Section 116 read with the Rules 103-133 of the Army Act, 1958. The Summary Security Force Court is held … protection from bias against an officer. We may notice that the Act which was enacted in the year 1968 even sought to fill up the gaps occurring in other Acts like Army Act, Navy Act or Armed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2010

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-28-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

that did not have an effective police force, law enforcement often could not pursue criminals beyond the town borders. See Brief for Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al. as Amici Curiae 15. Settlers in the West and … “the right … to have full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings concerning personal liberty, personal security, and the acquisition, enjoyment, and disposition of estate, real and personal, including the constitutional right to bear arms … 187; Calabresi, Two Cheers for Professor Balkin’s Originalism, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 663, 669-670 (2009). In … this federal suit against the City, which was consolidated with two related actions, alleging that the City’s handgun ban has left them vulnerable to criminals. … i.e., the Equal Protection Clause, it can hardly be said that the section does no more than prohibit discrimination. If what municipal respondents mean is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2008

District of Columbia Vs. Heller

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

meaning of the Second Amendment. A The Second Amendment provides: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” … Writings of Samuel Adams 299 (H. Cushing ed. 1968). They understood the right to enable individuals to … Distinction Between Words Esteemed Synonymous in the English Language 37 (1794) (emphasis added). Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second … 103-106. These experiences caused Englishmen to be extremely wary of concentrated military forces run by the state and to be jealous of their arms. They … of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal … the Freedmen’s Bureau Act on July 16, 1866. Section 14 stated: “[T]he right … to have full

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1974

California Bankers Assn. Vs. Shultz

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-01-1974

Subject : Right to Information

See 31 CFR pt. 103 (37 Fed.Reg. 6912). The Treasury Department task force found that law enforcement would not be greatly impaired by limiting the … these the Fourth Amendment has been applicable from the beginning. Cases of immigration officers stopping people at the border who are leaving or entering the country are obviously inapposite, and certainly the Court cannot be serious in … specified instruments exceeding $5,000 into or out of the country, exception being made, inter alia, for banks and security dealers. Section 241 requires individuals with bank accounts or other relationships with foreign banks to provide specified information … DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Syllabus The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, which was enacted following extensive hearings concerning the unavailability of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial