Advanced Search Results

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … original finding was one of 'Not Guilty' the Court shall, before passing sentence comply with Rules 101 and 102.(4)(a) Where the sentence alone is sent back for revision, the revision order shall be read in open court

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

of 1950), the Air Force Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 11968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 … available and such opinion shall be recorded in the convening order. Rule 102 of the said Army Rules provides that an officer who is disqualified … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … charge. In this behalf Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel places reliance on the pronouncement of this court in 102 (2003) DLT 415 (DB) Nirmal Lakra & Anr. v. Union of India and the judgment dated 21st November,

Janardan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Navy Act 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

in Force Custody and reduced his rank from Head Constable to Constable.16. As per Section 107 of The Border Security Force Act 1968 a finding or sentence by a Security Force Court has to be confirmed and a revision also lies … original finding was one of "Not Guilty", the Court shall, before passing sentence comply with rules 101 and 102.(4)(a) Where the sentence alone is sent back for revision, the revision order shall be read in open Court

Jang Bahadur Singh, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

appointments to disabled. In the present case the establishment in issue is Border Security Force established under Boarder Security Force Act 1968. The preamble of the Act describes the object as 'An act to provide for the constitution and regulation … [1994]1SCR657 , Kunal Singh v. Union of India and Anr. 2003(2) SC 102, L/NK Vinod Kumar v. Union of India and Ors. Mil LJ 2004 … to the BSF is concerned it is stated that the BSF has been exempted from the purview of Sections 33 and 47 of the Disability Act 1995 and in this regard there is no violation of Articles

Sukhwant Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 98; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 48

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)77; 1996CriLJ4079; 1996(38)DRJ299

about the said design to his superior officer. Proceedings before General Security Force Court were held under the Border Security Force Act,1968. After affording full opportunity to the petitioner, the proceeding of conviction was submitted. Authority sentenced the petitioner to … recorded simply as a finding of 'guilty or not guilty'. Under Rule 102 which is a deeming provision the punishment awarded in the sentence will … Usha Mehra, J. (1) This petitioner was charged with three offences punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter called the 'Act of 1988'). The first charge against

Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and or ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1997(1)WLC518; 1996(1)WLN466

compensation awarded by the learned Civil Judge; the Border Security Force, also, filed S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 102 of 1979 hallenglng the quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Civil Judge. The claimants, also, filed S.B. … 1622 and 1625 situated on Mandore Road, Jodhpur was acquired by the State Government for the purpose of Border Security Force. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, 'the Act') that the land is needed

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Rule 149 of the BSF Rules, 1969 or by the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. In the said case, the Supreme Court had carefully examined the provisions of Rule 149 of the Border

B.S.F. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1995(1)WLC48; 1994(2)WLN74

the aforesaid appeals by a common judgment, by which the appeals filed by the State of Rajasthan and Border Security Force (appellant) were dismissed, whereas the appeal filed by the claimants was allowed. Being aggrieved with the said judgment, … of the Land Acquisition Officer, the claimants moved for a reference Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the 'Act'), before the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur, who modified the Award passed by the Land … of learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur, the appellant filed Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 102/1979, the claimants-respondents filed C.M.A. No. 104/1979, the State of Rajasthan filed C.M.A.

U.B.S. Teotil and ors. Vs. Union of Inida and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 18; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 8

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi225B; 1978LabIC1225

Force, however, was initially regulated by the Act and the Rules framed there under until Parliament passed the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (Act 47 of 1968), for short, B.S.F. Act. By virtue of the provisions of Section 18 of the … past service, the petitioner would nevertheless be entitled to that benefit by virtue of the provisions of Rule 102 of the Rules in so far as the said Rule made a provision that in all matters with