Advanced Search Results

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any

P.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN435

working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer … passed without any enquiry. In precise, his case is that dismissal order is violative to the Service Rules, C.C.S. Pension Rules, Laws and Bye-Laws governing his service besides being illegal, arbitrary, against all canons of fair play

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 23 and 48; Indian Penal Code; Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Act

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

of the first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.'Since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under Section 23 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 … petitioner filled up for the post of Constable in Border Security Force on 6.3.2002, has been annexed as C.A.-1 with the counter-affidavit. He has replied to the questionnaire in Part A of the enrolment form consisting of

Constable Basavaraj Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 117 and 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 311; Border Security Force Rules

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR468]; ILR2005KAR3513

Petitioner from service on the ground that he was found guilty of charge under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act').2. The Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-(a) to quash the order of dismissal … Officer, Grade-I (Annexure-D) requesting the Petitioner to approach FHQ BSF, New Delhi, for copies of S S F C proceedings as the records were not available in the unit;(c) to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails

Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001(1)WLN135

of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance … 9 A.M. at Police Station, Ghadsana stating inter alia that on the preceding night within the zone of 100 metre inside the international border on the outpost of K.K.Tiba, P.W.I Constable Lakhvir Singh, P.W. 2 Home Guard

The Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. G. Majumdar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978CriLJ80

to take note of certain facts and relevant laws touching the materials on record.6. Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act. 1968 says that when a Criminal Court and a Security Force Court have each jurisdiction in respect of an … held inquest over the corpses, collected alamats and sent the dead bodies for post mortem examination. On 25-7-1974 C. I. D., West Bengal assumed control of the investigation. Ultimately under the order of the Inspector General of

Union of India (Uoi) Through Ministry of Home Affairs and ors. Vs. Ex- ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 117(2)

Reported in : (1993)103PLR356

with intent to outrage her modesty Madan Singh was consequently charged under Sections 40 and 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).During trial, Madan Singh confessed the charges levelled against him and consequently he … Secondary School and used criminal force with intent to outrage her modesty Madan Singh was consequently charged under Sections 40 and 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).During trial, Madan … S.D. Aggarwal, C.J.1. The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order of the

Kali Das Vs. Union of India

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilConstitution

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN577

pressed before us.18. In the result, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Enquiry--Desired officers not willing and available due to exigencies of service--Officer appointed and Private Counsel permitted to … Court of enquiry was ordered and witnesses were examined by the court of enquiry and a charge-sheet Under Section 30(b) for misappropriating fund of Rs. 42,602.84 was issued on 17.10.86 vide Ex. 6 but the petitioner was