Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 chapter 8 · Page 1 of about 53 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 2013

Ex. Const. Tejbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Other

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

234, 235 and 236 thereof. In the case at hand, the offences complained of have arisen under the Border Security Force Act, 1968, to which, admittedly, the petitioner/accused was subject, and which forms a complete Code as regards the offences, as … trial since the nature of the charges do not conform to the requirements of Rule 53 (1) of Chapter VIII of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 relating to charges and matters antecedent to trial. The relevant … do not conform to the requirements of Rule 53 (1) of Chapter VIII of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 relating to charges and matters

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1989

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … the Constitution of India as no opportunity of hearing was given and the procedural safeguards as contained in Chapters VII to XI of the Rules were not followed for arriving at a decision of guilt against the … to him.4. The appellant as plaintiff after serving a notice under Section 80 of the CPC and as no redress was given to him, filed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1988

Border Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-07-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2(2) and 3; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4

BSF vesting in the Central Government by virtue of what has been stated in Section 4 of the Border Security Force Act inasmuch as Commission of Enquiry is a fact finding body and by appointing such a Commission no control … The Central Government can suo motu deploy the force in any State.' 15. The BSF Act 47 of 1968 and the rules promulgated under the Act were heavily relied in support of the writ petitions therefore we … residing in the border areas of the country. This Act in ten chapters covers 142 sections. At first two sets of Rules were promulgated. Border … sustained. The inquiry later was posted to March 18 and 19, 1988. 8. On March 12, 1988 BSF filed another writ petition (Civil Rule No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 03 2010

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … the procedure which is to be followed by it is statutorily prescripted under Rules 133 to 161 of Chapter XI of the BSF Rules, 1969. Essential procedural safeguards have been statutorily provided so as to ensure fairness … dated 11th October, 1996, the respondents reinstated the petitioner into service w.e.f. 8th September, 1996 and adjusted him against an existing vacancy of constable in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2014

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-06-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area … authority is required to give personal hearing as well as reasoned findings.34. Chapter XI of BSF Rules, 1969 lays down the procedure to be followed … Mr. Justice R.A. Mehta (Retd.) and Ors. reported in Civil Appeal Nos. 8814-8815 of 2012 and S.L.P. (C) Nos. 2625-2626 and 2687-2688 of 2012 as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2015

No.90006506 CT Gajen Gara Goyary Vs. The Union of India, Represented b ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the authorities. The various punishments awardable by the Security Force Court are specified in Section 48 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Act ) and apart from dismissal, other punishment options are available under … Thereafter a Summary Security Force Court Proceeding (hereinafter referred to as the Summary Court ) was started under Chapter-XI of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Rules ). The Summary Court … Constable, the punishment of dismissal from service is disproportionate for his subordinate. 8. Ms. A. Gayan, the learned C.G.C. refers to the counter affidavit filed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1994

Headmaster, Poilkav High School, P.O. Edakkulam Quilandy Vs. Murali A. ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-02-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1995Ker21

imported. It further held that the same ratio will apply to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It is also pointed out that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the B.S.F. Rules … and this happened in front of other students and caused considerable mental agony to the teacher.' (Annexure A 8) The above events narrated in the memorandum of appeal have not been denied by the first respondent by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2000

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-26-2000

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

to quash the Communication dated 10.8.1987 confirming the punishment of dismissal from service under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'.2. The petitioner, at the material time in the year 1987, was posted … Force of the Union for ensuring the security of the borders of India and for matters connected therewith. Chapter II of the Act provides constitution of the Force and conditions of service of the members of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1978

P.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-02-1978

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN435

working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General … Commandant. Border Security Force STC. Jodhpur, vide his order No. DV-2/STC/16193 dated 8-11-1977. The petitioner thereafter made representation to the Director General, Border Security Force. … inquiry was a condition precedent for the trial of the petitioner. The Act is a self contained Code Chapter III deals with the offences and Chapter IV deals with the punishments. Chapter V deals with the provisions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1990

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-1990

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Rules, 1967 were applicable to the members of the B.S.F. comprising the Subordinate Officers, Under Officers and Constables. Chapter XV was inserted in the 1955 Rules, captioned 'Special Provisions Relating to the Border Security Force'. This Chapter … of continuous regular appointment in that rank'. According to Rules 7 and 8, seniority list of Sub-Inspectors and Inspectors (Subedars) 'shall be maintained' by Deputy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial