Advanced Search Results

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … the plaintiff filed an appeal which was registered as Title Appeal No. 7 of 1979 in the Court of Additional District Judge, West Tripura District … the Constitution of India as no opportunity of hearing was given and the procedural safeguards as contained in Chapters VII to XI of the Rules were not followed for arriving at a decision of guilt against the

P.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN435

working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General … inquiry was a condition precedent for the trial of the petitioner. The Act is a self contained Code Chapter III deals with the offences and Chapter IV deals with the punishments. Chapter V deals with the provisions … The said order, therefore, does not comply with the requirements of Article 77 of the Constitution and so it cannot be said that the power

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … of the Act by the Commandant. The procedure adopted by the Summary Security Force Court is prescribed in Chapter IX. Rule 142 deals with general plea of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'. Rule 142 of the Border Security … Security Force Court was constituted in exercise of the powers under Section 70 of the Act by the Commandant. The procedure adopted by the Summary

State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 109, 201; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 80, 2(1)(a), 47, 141(1), 141(2); Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1983 - Rule 7, 41; Constitution of India - Article 136

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force … (2) of the Act has made the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”. Chapter VI of the Rules is in relation to choice of jurisdiction between Security Force Court and criminal court. … the accused shall be intimated to the court as required under Rule 7 of the Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of

State of J and K Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force … (2) of the Act has made the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”. Chapter VI of the Rules is in relation to choice of jurisdiction between Security Force Court and criminal court. … the accused shall be intimated to the court as required under Rule 7 of the Jammu & Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … the procedure which is to be followed by it is statutorily prescripted under Rules 133 to 161 of Chapter XI of the BSF Rules, 1969. Essential procedural safeguards have been statutorily provided so as to ensure fairness … BSF. The period of the petitioner's absence w.e.f. 1st June, 1996 to 7th September, 1996 was regularised by granting 99 days earned leave.5. A fresh

Ex. Const. Tejbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Other

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

234, 235 and 236 thereof. In the case at hand, the offences complained of have arisen under the Border Security Force Act, 1968, to which, admittedly, the petitioner/accused was subject, and which forms a complete Code as regards the offences, as … trial since the nature of the charges do not conform to the requirements of Rule 53 (1) of Chapter VIII of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 relating to charges and matters antecedent to trial. The relevant

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … Petty Security Force Courts; and (c) Summary Security Force Courts. xxxxxx Section 70. Summary Security Force Court.-. (1) A Summary Security Force Court may be … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area … authority is required to give personal hearing as well as reasoned findings.34. Chapter XI of BSF Rules, 1969 lays down the procedure to be followed

No.90006506 CT Gajen Gara Goyary Vs. The Union of India, Represented b ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

the authorities. The various punishments awardable by the Security Force Court are specified in Section 48 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Act ) and apart from dismissal, other punishment options are available under … Thereafter a Summary Security Force Court Proceeding (hereinafter referred to as the Summary Court ) was started under Chapter-XI of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Rules ). The Summary Court … the 57th Battalion of the BSF Patiram (WB), by the order dated 7.6.2007 (Annexure-A). According to the suspension order, the two BSF men had facilitated

Headmaster, Poilkav High School, P.O. Edakkulam Quilandy Vs. Murali A. ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1995Ker21

imported. It further held that the same ratio will apply to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It is also pointed out that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the B.S.F. Rules … by 'maintaining discipline and decorum was found to be difficult. In that situation the appellant sent Annexure A 7 registered notice dated 23-9-1993 to the father of the first respondent, which was received by him on 27-9-1993.