Advanced Search Results
Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-31-1989
ServiceConstitution
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311
AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)
dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … the Constitution of India as no opportunity of hearing was given and the procedural safeguards as contained in Chapters VII to XI of the Rules were not followed for arriving at a decision of guilt against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Another Vs. O.P. Bishnoi
Delhi
May-11-2000
Service
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rules 45 and 46
2000VAD(Delhi)937; 2000(54)DRJ264
a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present case the relevant chapter is VII and commence with … matter on merits. Investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed by a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present … the findings of the General Security Court Force could not be sustained. 5. The aforesaid judgment in C.W. 2435 of 1991 dated 11th April, 1994
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBorder Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.
Guwahati
Oct-07-1988
Constitution
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2(2) and 3; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4
Matched in: Parties Border Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jun-03-2010
Border Security Force
Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575
consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … 12th April, 1996 issued by the commandant of the battalion under Rule 53(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1969 (BSF Act, 1969 hereafter) making … the procedure which is to be followed by it is statutorily prescripted under Rules 133 to 161 of Chapter XI of the BSF Rules, 1969. Essential procedural safeguards have been statutorily provided so as to ensure fairness
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx. Const. Tejbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Other
Delhi
Apr-18-2013
Land Acquisition
234, 235 and 236 thereof. In the case at hand, the offences complained of have arisen under the Border Security Force Act, 1968, to which, admittedly, the petitioner/accused was subject, and which forms a complete Code as regards the offences, as … trial since the nature of the charges do not conform to the requirements of Rule 53 (1) of Chapter VIII of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 relating to charges and matters antecedent to trial. The relevant … nature of the charges do not conform to the requirements of Rule 53 (1) of Chapter VIII of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 relating
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNo.90006506 CT Gajen Gara Goyary Vs. The Union of India, Represented b ...
Guwahati
Aug-18-2015
Land Acquisition
the authorities. The various punishments awardable by the Security Force Court are specified in Section 48 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Act ) and apart from dismissal, other punishment options are available under … Thereafter a Summary Security Force Court Proceeding (hereinafter referred to as the Summary Court ) was started under Chapter-XI of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Rules ). The Summary Court … Central Govt. Counsel (CGC). 2. The petitioner was a Constable in the 57th Battalion of the Border Security Force (BSF) and while he was on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHeadmaster, Poilkav High School, P.O. Edakkulam Quilandy Vs. Murali A. ...
Kerala
Mar-02-1994
Constitution
Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
AIR1995Ker21
imported. It further held that the same ratio will apply to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It is also pointed out that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the B.S.F. Rules … respondent was received by the appellant from two other teachers (Madhusoodanan A.I. and Valsala K.) also.' (Annexures A 5 and A 6) a (5) 'A complaint was received from another teacher (Yamuna) stating that on 27-9-1993 while
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-02-1978
Constitution
1978(11)WLN435
working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General … inquiry was a condition precedent for the trial of the petitioner. The Act is a self contained Code Chapter III deals with the offences and Chapter IV deals with the punishments. Chapter V deals with the provisions … Rule 48 of the Rules and the charge was heard under Rule 51. The respondents refuted the contention of the petitioner that Court of inquiry
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-08-1990
Constitution
Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)
1990MPLJ417
and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Rules, 1967 were applicable to the members of the B.S.F. comprising the Subordinate Officers, Under Officers and Constables. Chapter XV was inserted in the 1955 Rules, captioned 'Special Provisions Relating to the Border Security Force'. This Chapter … per Annexures P/5, P/6 and PAS. They have been impleaded as Respondents 5 to 46. As per Annexure P/5. it is claimed, respondents Nos. 18,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar Rai Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jul-30-2013
Land Acquisition
by the General Security Force Court and the Petty Security Force Court. As per the scheme of the Border Security Force Act, 1908 & Rules thereunder, Rule 99 is mentioned in Chapter 9 which relates to Procedure for Security Force … 1999. By a charge-sheet dated 12th October, 1999, the following charges were issued against the petitioner:First Charge BSF Act 1968 Sec.20(a) Using Criminal Force to his Superior Officer In that he, at BOP Ranian on 4.1.99 at about … taken by the Delhi High Court in the decision in Nirmal Lakra v. Union of India and Ors. [2003 DLT (102) 415]. However, it need
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »