Advanced Search Results

Ex. Const. Tejbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Other

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

234, 235 and 236 thereof. In the case at hand, the offences complained of have arisen under the Border Security Force Act, 1968, to which, admittedly, the petitioner/accused was subject, and which forms a complete Code as regards the offences, as … trial since the nature of the charges do not conform to the requirements of Rule 53 (1) of Chapter VIII of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 relating to charges and matters antecedent to trial. The relevant … the offence of absenting himself without leave, the petitioner was punished with 28 days rigorous imprisonment.4. Since the petitioner had remained absent without leave as

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … of the Act by the Commandant. The procedure adopted by the Summary Security Force Court is prescribed in Chapter IX. Rule 142 deals with general plea of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'. Rule 142 of the Border Security … participating in anti-militancy operational duty in sensitive area of Village Dedha on 28. 5. 1998 when he was found missing from other troops at about

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … applies to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117 … which has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge by order dated 28th April, 2004. It is this order of the learned Single Judge which

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … functioning of the BSF. It governs acts of misconduct and offences committed by the members of the BSF. Chapter III of the BSF Act deals with such offences. Section 41(e) describes one such offence when a member … decision of the Supreme Court in Rishbud v. State of Delhi AIR1955SC196 28. The Court finds that the BSF Act is a statute regulating the

Sripurna Chandra Nahak. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act - Section 19 (b), 141, 11(2), 177, 11 Rules 177, 6; Central Civil Service (CCS) - Rule 41, 25.

for grant of minimum pension despite the fact that the petitioner has completed 16 years of service in Border Security Force (hereinafter referred to as 'the B.S.F.') and, thereafter, he has been dismissed from service on the ground of … Force for passing the impugned order of dismissal for an offence made under section 19 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 following the procedure contained in Chapters- VIII to XI of the Rules framed under section 141 of the … section 19 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 following the procedure contained in Chapters- VIII to XI of the Rules framed under section 141 of the … of leave praying for grant of leave for further medical treatment. On 28.4.1999, the Second-in- Command passed an order dismissing the petitioner from service with

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Rules, 1967 were applicable to the members of the B.S.F. comprising the Subordinate Officers, Under Officers and Constables. Chapter XV was inserted in the 1955 Rules, captioned 'Special Provisions Relating to the Border Security Force'. This Chapter … any promotion be required to pass a pre-promotion course referred to rule 28 and such other examinations as may be specified by the Director General,

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … on the Director General and other Officers of the Force under Section 11 of the Act.35. This apart, Chapter-III of the Act, particularly Sections 14 to 46 of the Act indicate various types of offences which are … regularized as per rules.6. The operative portion of the appellate order dated 28.5.2005 [copy at Annexure-D] reads as under:Therefore, I commute the sentence to three

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area … authority is required to give personal hearing as well as reasoned findings.34. Chapter XI of BSF Rules, 1969 lays down the procedure to be followed … by DIG after an interview. Both the representations were disposed of on 28.8.1994, almost a year prior to 21.6.1995 the date of alleged incident. He

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

27.04.1974 which entrusted functions of customs officer to police officers in a particular jurisdiction and officers of the Border Security Force respectively. However, in the case of DRI officers, they would clearly fall under Sections 3, 4 and 5 … Functions of the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India “, 4th Edition, 1968, pages 68-70 (Annexure R XIII). As the work of Directorates of Inspection … or imposed on an officer of customs other than those specified in Chapter XV and section 108.” 224 [2024] 12 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause

P.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN435

working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General … inquiry was a condition precedent for the trial of the petitioner. The Act is a self contained Code Chapter III deals with the offences and Chapter IV deals with the punishments. Chapter V deals with the provisions