Advanced Search Results
Special Police Establishment versus Kamta Prasad Mishra and Others
Supreme Court of India
Jun-15-2026
[2026] 7 S.C.R. 113
Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949; Border Security Force Act, 1968; Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968; Penal Code, 1860; Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013; U. P. Lokayukt and … investigated by the SPE are limited to those punishable under the Act of 1988 and u/ss.409, 420 and Chapter XVIII of the Penal Code - Insofar as issues of ‘intelligence’ and ‘security’ are concerned, neither the Lokayukt … Chaukidar Panchayat (Magadh Division) v. State of Bihar and Others SLP(C) No. 18983 of 2023 decided on 02.04.2025; University and Another v. All India Council
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Aug-13-2003
Service
Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80
2003(3)JKJ381
dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … of the Act by the Commandant. The procedure adopted by the Summary Security Force Court is prescribed in Chapter IX. Rule 142 deals with general plea of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'. Rule 142 of the Border Security
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-08-1990
Constitution
Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)
1990MPLJ417
and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Rules, 1967 were applicable to the members of the B.S.F. comprising the Subordinate Officers, Under Officers and Constables. Chapter XV was inserted in the 1955 Rules, captioned 'Special Provisions Relating to the Border Security Force'. This Chapter … exercise of powers conferred under section 141 of 1968 Act and Rule 181 of these Rules also contains a saving clause of the same purport.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-31-1989
ServiceConstitution
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311
AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)
dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … the Constitution of India as no opportunity of hearing was given and the procedural safeguards as contained in Chapters VII to XI of the Rules were not followed for arriving at a decision of guilt against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Another Vs. O.P. Bishnoi
Delhi
May-11-2000
Service
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rules 45 and 46
2000VAD(Delhi)937; 2000(54)DRJ264
a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present case the relevant chapter is VII and commence with … matter on merits. Investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed by a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present … material placed before it by a Prosecuting Officer and deliver judgment thereon. 18. The reasoning, that the Commandant having dealt with the case at the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion Of India Vs. Jogeshwar Swain
Supreme Court of India
Sep-05-2023
Land Acquisition
of an offence under Section 40 Civil Appeal Nos. 8629-8630 of 2014 Page 2 of 31 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, “BSF Act, 1968”), that is for committing an act prejudicial to the good order and discipline … conferred upon it by Section 141 of the BSF Act, 1968, the Central Government notified BSF Rules, 1969. Chapter VII of the BSF Rules, 1969 deals with investigation and summary disposal. Rule 43 provides that where it … No written record of the confession said to have been made on 18th June, 2005 exists; (6) Most importantly, the camera reel (though recovered on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)
Kolkata
Mar-03-2009
Service
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226
referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … applies to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117 … not proved in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. It is also the case of the appellant that the proceedings have
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: for Stay (Can 6546/05)
Kolkata
Mar-03-2009
Civil
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … applies to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117 … not proved in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. It is also the case of the appellant that the proceedings have
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi
Aug-20-2014
Land Acquisition
of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … functioning of the BSF. It governs acts of misconduct and offences committed by the members of the BSF. Chapter III of the BSF Act deals with such offences. Section 41(e) describes one such offence when a member … of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and the order on sentence dated 18th February 2008 whereby he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment („RI‟) for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaljinder Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-21-2005
Service
2006(3)SLJ392(P& H)
decision of the Summary Security Force Court, the petitioner preferred a statutory petition under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 along with an application under Section 130 of the Act for suspension of the sentence imposed upon him. … hand, Summary Security Force Court proceedings are to be held in accordance with the procedure laid down in Chapter XI of the Rules. It will be apposite to refer Rules 139, 142 and 145, which read as … enquire into the circumstance under which the petitioner unauthorizedly loaded and despatched 185 mm UG-cable of 69.5 meters length on civilian tractor (Eichcr) trolley No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »