Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 chapter 14 · Page 1 of about 53 results (0.019 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 07 2007

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … on the Director General and other Officers of the Force under Section 11 of the Act.35. This apart, Chapter-III of the Act, particularly Sections 14 to 46 of the Act indicate various types of offences which are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2013

Ex. Const. Tejbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Other

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

234, 235 and 236 thereof. In the case at hand, the offences complained of have arisen under the Border Security Force Act, 1968, to which, admittedly, the petitioner/accused was subject, and which forms a complete Code as regards the offences, as … trial since the nature of the charges do not conform to the requirements of Rule 53 (1) of Chapter VIII of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 relating to charges and matters antecedent to trial. The relevant … in the BSF in the year 1990. It is alleged that on 14th December, 1996, during his posting at Taratala (Calcutta), when the petitioner, who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1978

P.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-02-1978

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN435

working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General … inquiry was a condition precedent for the trial of the petitioner. The Act is a self contained Code Chapter III deals with the offences and Chapter IV deals with the punishments. Chapter V deals with the provisions … his conviction and sentence inter alia on the grounds stated in para 14 of the writ petition, but during the arguments of the writ petition,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 1989

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … contained in chapters VII to XI of the Rules framed under Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act. The Border Security Force Act has … the Constitution of India as no opportunity of hearing was given and the procedural safeguards as contained in Chapters VII to XI of the Rules were not followed for arriving at a decision of guilt against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1990

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-1990

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Rules, 1967 were applicable to the members of the B.S.F. comprising the Subordinate Officers, Under Officers and Constables. Chapter XV was inserted in the 1955 Rules, captioned 'Special Provisions Relating to the Border Security Force'. This Chapter … two-fold grievance complaining brazen violation by respondents 1 to 4 of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution and of statutory provisions resulting in his

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2003

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Aug-13-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … of the Act by the Commandant. The procedure adopted by the Summary Security Force Court is prescribed in Chapter IX. Rule 142 deals with general plea of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'. Rule 142 of the Border Security … with Rakia Bano D/O Lal Din R/O Shajroo. The victim was of 14 years of age. He was taken into Judicial Custody at Central Jail,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2013

Anil Kumar Rai Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the General Security Force Court and the Petty Security Force Court. As per the scheme of the Border Security Force Act, 1908 & Rules thereunder, Rule 99 is mentioned in Chapter 9 which relates to Procedure for Security ForceChapter 11 of the Rules. Our attention has been drawn to Rule 149 in Chapter 11 which requires the Summary Security Force Court to record … 1999. By a charge-sheet dated 12th October, 1999, the following charges were issued against the petitioner:First Charge BSF Act 1968 Sec.20(a) Using Criminal Force to his Superior Officer In that he, at BOP Ranian on 4.1.99 at about

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2023

Union Of India Vs. Jogeshwar Swain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-05-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of an offence under Section 40 Civil Appeal Nos. 8629-8630 of 2014 Page 2 of 31 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, “BSF Act, 1968”), that is for committing an act prejudicial to the good order and discipline … conferred upon it by Section 141 of the BSF Act, 1968, the Central Government notified BSF Rules, 1969. Chapter VII of the BSF Rules, 1969 deals with investigation and summary disposal. Rule 43 provides that where it … Act, 1968 which, inter-alia, includes the power to dismiss from service.22. Section 141 (1) of the BSF Act, 1968 empowers the Central Government to make

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2009

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-03-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … applies to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2009

In Re: for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-03-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … applies to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial