Advanced Search Results

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area … authority is required to give personal hearing as well as reasoned findings.34. Chapter XI of BSF Rules, 1969 lays down the procedure to be followed … of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with

Headmaster, Poilkav High School, P.O. Edakkulam Quilandy Vs. Murali A. ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1995Ker21

imported. It further held that the same ratio will apply to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It is also pointed out that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the B.S.F. Rules … petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It is also pointed out that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the B.S.F. Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117 of

No.90006506 CT Gajen Gara Goyary Vs. The Union of India, Represented b ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

the authorities. The various punishments awardable by the Security Force Court are specified in Section 48 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Act ) and apart from dismissal, other punishment options are available under … Thereafter a Summary Security Force Court Proceeding (hereinafter referred to as the Summary Court ) was started under Chapter-XI of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Rules ). The Summary Court … of the two delinquents be struck off from the BSF Unit w.e.f. 13.6.2007 (Annexure-J). The aggrieved constable approached the Appellate Authority but the Director General,

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … the Constitution of India as no opportunity of hearing was given and the procedural safeguards as contained in Chapters VII to XI of the Rules were not followed for arriving at a decision of guilt against the

Babu Joseph Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (Subordinate Officers and Under Officers Promotion and Seniority) Rules, 1975 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 13(2), 18(2), 19(1), 20, 119(1) and 129; Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 123, 124, 125, 136(5) and 136(6); Central Reserve Police Force (Amendment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A(2)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ417

and it is necessary, therefore, to state clearly the position in that regard at the very outset. The Border Security Force Act, 1968, for short, 1968 Act, takes care to indicate vide section 142(1) the fact of prior existence of the … Rules, 1967 were applicable to the members of the B.S.F. comprising the Subordinate Officers, Under Officers and Constables. Chapter XV was inserted in the 1955 Rules, captioned 'Special Provisions Relating to the Border Security Force'. This Chapter … Relating to the Border Security Force'. This Chapter covers Rules 117 to 136 and indeed, subsequently in the 'New' or 1975 Rules, these provisions have

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … of the Act by the Commandant. The procedure adopted by the Summary Security Force Court is prescribed in Chapter IX. Rule 142 deals with general plea of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'. Rule 142 of the Border Security

Anil Kumar Rai Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the General Security Force Court and the Petty Security Force Court. As per the scheme of the Border Security Force Act, 1908 & Rules thereunder, Rule 99 is mentioned in Chapter 9 which relates to Procedure for Security Force … 1999. By a charge-sheet dated 12th October, 1999, the following charges were issued against the petitioner:First Charge BSF Act 1968 Sec.20(a) Using Criminal Force to his Superior Officer In that he, at BOP Ranian on 4.1.99 at about

Union Of India Vs. Jogeshwar Swain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of an offence under Section 40 Civil Appeal Nos. 8629-8630 of 2014 Page 2 of 31 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, “BSF Act, 1968”), that is for committing an act prejudicial to the good order and discipline … conferred upon it by Section 141 of the BSF Act, 1968, the Central Government notified BSF Rules, 1969. Chapter VII of the BSF Rules, 1969 deals with investigation and summary disposal. Rule 43 provides that where it … would not be a fit case where the discretionary powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India be invoked to set aside an order

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … applies to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117 … during the course of the proceedings held by SSFC between 12th and 13th November, 2001. The appellant pointed out that there was a contradiction in

In Re: for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162 and 164(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … applies to a petition under Section 117(2) of the Act also. We may also point out here that Chapter XIII consisting of Rules 167 to 169 of the BSF Rules deals with petitions filed under Section 117 … during the course of the proceedings held by SSFC between 12th and 13th November, 2001. The appellant pointed out that there was a contradiction in