Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 chapter 07 · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 20 2014

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-20-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … functioning of the BSF. It governs acts of misconduct and offences committed by the members of the BSF. Chapter III of the BSF Act deals with such offences. Section 41(e) describes one such offence when a member

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2024

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

27.04.1974 which entrusted functions of customs officer to police officers in a particular jurisdiction and officers of the Border Security Force respectively. However, in the case of DRI officers, they would clearly fall under Sections 3, 4 and 5 … Functions of the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India “, 4th Edition, 1968, pages 68-70 (Annexure R XIII). As the work of Directorates of Inspection … or imposed on an officer of customs other than those specified in Chapter XV and section 108.” 224 [2024] 12 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports … 2021) In (Civil Appeal No. 1827 of 2018) 07 November 2024 [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2011

Ravi Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32

Provisions relating to Border Security Force was inserted in the CRPF Rules. On 02.09.1968 the Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act 1968, to provide for the constitution and regulation of an Armed Force of the Union for ensuring the safety … time. At the time of its constitution BSF was governed by CRPF Rules, and for purpose of which, Chapter XV titled „Special Provisions relating to Border Security Force was inserted in the CRPF Rules. On 02.09.1968 the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 19 2011

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Right to Information

excludes the jurisdiction exercisable by the procedure applicable to Army Act, Navy Act, Air Force Act and the Border Security Act. By such exclusion, the court martial was competent even to make trial of the individual when the … SCC 161). Though it related to Sections 64, 70, 74, 117(1)(2) and 141 of the Border Security Forces Act 1968, the question was whether the court was to give reasons in support of its verdict. Placing reliance on … that ordering investigation under Regulation 149 of the Regulations is prescribed in Chapter V and the Regulations for board of inquiry are prescribed under Chapter … Halol and back to Delhi from AM 04 Jul 02 to PM 07 Jul 02, to be used for official purposes, to wit he claimed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2023

B.s. Hari Commandant Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Inquiry Report, the appellant was issued charge sheet dated 04.07.1995 under Sections 40 & 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the “BSF Act”). However, the charges, as laid aforesaid, were dropped. 38. Thereafter, the … Rule 59(1)(i) of the Rules and thus, the second charge sheet dated 20.10.1995 is illegal more so since Chapter VIII of the Rules do not contemplate the issuance of any second charge sheet under the BSF Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial