Advanced Search Results

Randhir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226;; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 16, 17, 40, 46,47, 74, 74(1)(2), 115, 116, 117 and 167(2);; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 51(2), 142(2), 143, 143(2), 145, 147, 148, 149, 157 and 159

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT107(HC)

Admittedly the charges against the petitioner came within the purview of section 16(d) and section 46 of the Border Security Force Act which read thus :--'16. Offences punishable more severely on active duty than at other times--any person subject to … purpose would mean trial in terms of the relevant rules governed by Chapter-11 of the Border Security Force Rules. In the instant case, according to … Randhir Singh of this unit has been charged with an Offences under section 16(d) and 40 of BSF Act 1968 committed on 10.3.92 at BOP Bornberia at about 21.30 hrs. left the said picauet without orders from his … Singh to open fire on a civilian marriage party, consequent to which 03 persons sustained bullet injuries. I hereby direct that the said No. 71310032

Baljinder Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2006(3)SLJ392(P& H)

decision of the Summary Security Force Court, the petitioner preferred a statutory petition under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 along with an application under Section 130 of the Act for suspension of the sentence imposed upon him. … hand, Summary Security Force Court proceedings are to be held in accordance with the procedure laid down in Chapter XI of the Rules. It will be apposite to refer Rules 139, 142 and 145, which read as

Walumba Lumba (Previously Referred to as Wl) (Congo) 1 and 2 (Appellan ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

document entitled "Bail Proposal for Foreign National Prisoners" in which she said: "Since April 2006, the BIA [("the Border and Immigration Agency")] has been applying a near blanket ban on release, regardless of whether removal can be … is evolving and that there might be compelling reasons not to publish some policies, for example, where national security issues are in play. Nor is it necessary to publish details which are irrelevant to the substance of … (1) Where a recommendation for deportation made by a court is in force in respect of any person, and that person is not detained in … criteria and the general presumption remain in place." Chapter 38 of the Operational Enforcement Manual ("OEM"), which … the completion of their sentences of imprisonment. Section 3(5)(a) of the Immigration Act 1971 ("the 1971 Act") provides that a person who is not a

B.s. Hari Commandant Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Inquiry Report, the appellant was issued charge sheet dated 04.07.1995 under Sections 40 & 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the “BSF Act”). However, the charges, as laid aforesaid, were dropped. 38. Thereafter, the … Rule 59(1)(i) of the Rules and thus, the second charge sheet dated 20.10.1995 is illegal more so since Chapter VIII of the Rules do not contemplate the issuance of any second charge sheet under the BSF Act

Dinesh Kumar Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

a para-military force. Its members carry arms. There is no place for belligerence in a disciplined force like Border Security Force. Noting incidents of gross discipline are on the rise in the armed forces, we do not find penalty … the petitioner.31. The third submission advanced by the petitioner is based upon an incomplete reading of the BSF Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder in the year 1969.32. Chapter V of BSF Act (Sections 57 to63) deals … did not join duty and reported on 13.03.2000 after remaining absent 2. 03.05.2000 at about 08.55 P.M. Petitioner inflicted a fist blow on the face