Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: boilers act 1923 section 4 · Page 1 of about 71 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 01 2004

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

Act, 1961 vis a vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. 3. The Apprentices Act, 1961 was promulgated primarily for the purpose of recruiting the apprentices. The idea behind … fourteen years of age and satisfies such standards or education and physical fitness as may be prescribed. 14. Section 4 which is relevant for our purpose reads as under:- 'Contract of apprenticeship - (1) No person shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2014

A.C. Mahesh and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted. 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2014

Mahesh a C Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted.-.106- 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 16 2004

Virender Singh Vs. Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd., Through the Manag ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25F; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 4(1), 4(4), 5, 7, 18, 22, 22(1), 33(2) and 33C(2); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR1159]; (2005)IILLJ856P& H; (2005)139PLR830

of Apprentices Act, 1961, vis-a-vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. Registration of the contract under sub-Section (4) of Section 4 of the Act of 1961 being mandatory or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2008

Shyam Sunder Agrawal Vs. Jawahar Prasad and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Feb-04-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR475]

Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation was justified in awarding compensation under Section 4(1)(b) & (c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 in the absence of medical evidence to prove the nature and the extent of disablement suffered by the … under the employment of the appellant/employer in the Shellac factory at Sakti.(B) Jawahar Prasad climbed up to the Boiler for removing the chelli (a temporary platform created with bamboos and ropes to facilitate work at the desired

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 2015

The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Pappathi

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-17-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

3.Vasanthi ..Respondent No.3/Petitioner No.3 Prayer This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 against the order made in W.C.No.171 of 2009, dated 30.4.2013 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of … conduct, since the deceased, who was conversant with swmming into water, had gone for a swim with the boiler suit, is not totally impugned.?. 2.2010(2) TN MAC609SC)(Mamtaj Bi Babusab Nadaf and others .versus United India Insurance Company

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2003

Director General (investigation Vs. thermax Private Limited

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : I(2003)CPJ158MRTP

submitted that it takes about 6-8 months to manufacture and assemble a boiler and that under the Indian Boilers Act, 1923 read with the Indian Boilers Regulations, 1950, which govern the manufacture and sale of boilers, every part/ component … the aforesaid deficiencies, the respondent is liable to be charged with unfair trade practices within the meaning of Sections 36-A(1)(i), (iii), (iv), (vi), (vii) and (viii) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (the MRTP … 1. The above listed Unfair Trade Practices Enquiry No. 47/ 89 and the Compensation Application No. 237/ 96 are connected matters arising

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 1991

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Vs. Collector of Central Excise and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)(37)LC604Tri(Delhi)

conceived, executed and formalised by an agreement; that even for the purpose of Section 2(f) of the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, the owner is not only the actual owner but any other person using the boiler which was hired … in different buildings. That a factory can be housed in more than one building is also clear from Section 4 of the Factories Act (d) Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Joint Secretary, Government of India

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1993

Collector of Central Excise Vs. thermax (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-06-1993

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(70)ELT247TriDel

related equipment. The boilers had to be manufactured and installed keeping in view the safety aspect. The Indian Boilers Act, 1923 provides mainly for the safety of life and property of persons from the dangers of explosion, prevention of … commissioning charges was allowable (Para 1.15); (10) The assessee have contravened the provisions of Rule 173C(1) read with Section 4, and Rules 5 and 7 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975, Rule 173F read with Rule 173G(i)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 1990

Calorex India Ltd. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-11-1990

Subject : Company

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 14; ;State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas429(Cal)

trade is a very sophisticated one and is controlled by various provisions of the statute, viz., the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, and the rules framed thereunder. By reason whereof, this court directed the Chief Inspector of Boilers, West Bengal, … appearing in support of the application strenuously contended that by reason of the express provision as engrafted in Section 14 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and since no sanction or approval has been accorded … disclaimer as regards the registered office of the company. Admittedly, there are 45 employees in the registered office and the purchaser has an obligation to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial