Advanced Search Results
U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-01-2004
Labour and Industrial
Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23
AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175
Act, 1961 vis a vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. 3. The Apprentices Act, 1961 was promulgated primarily for the purpose of recruiting the apprentices. The idea behind … fourteen years of age and satisfies such standards or education and physical fitness as may be prescribed. 14. Section 4 which is relevant for our purpose reads as under:- 'Contract of apprenticeship - (1) No person shall be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.C. Mahesh and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others
Karnataka
Sep-23-2014
Land Acquisition
the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted. 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahesh a C Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-23-2014
Land Acquisition
the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted.-.106- 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Virender Singh Vs. Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd., Through the Manag ...
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-16-2004
Labour and Industrial
Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25F; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 4(1), 4(4), 5, 7, 18, 22, 22(1), 33(2) and 33C(2); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2005(105)FLR1159]; (2005)IILLJ856P& H; (2005)139PLR830
of Apprentices Act, 1961, vis-a-vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. Registration of the contract under sub-Section (4) of Section 4 of the Act of 1961 being mandatory or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Sunder Agrawal Vs. Jawahar Prasad and ors.
Chhattisgarh
Feb-04-2008
Labour and Industrial
[2008(118)FLR475]
Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation was justified in awarding compensation under Section 4(1)(b) & (c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 in the absence of medical evidence to prove the nature and the extent of disablement suffered by the … under the employment of the appellant/employer in the Shellac factory at Sakti.(B) Jawahar Prasad climbed up to the Boiler for removing the chelli (a temporary platform created with bamboos and ropes to facilitate work at the desired
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Pappathi
Chennai
Jun-17-2015
Land Acquisition
3.Vasanthi ..Respondent No.3/Petitioner No.3 Prayer This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 against the order made in W.C.No.171 of 2009, dated 30.4.2013 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of … conduct, since the deceased, who was conversant with swmming into water, had gone for a swim with the boiler suit, is not totally impugned.?. 2.2010(2) TN MAC609SC)(Mamtaj Bi Babusab Nadaf and others .versus United India Insurance Company
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector General (investigation Vs. thermax Private Limited
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Feb-27-2003
MRTP
I(2003)CPJ158MRTP
submitted that it takes about 6-8 months to manufacture and assemble a boiler and that under the Indian Boilers Act, 1923 read with the Indian Boilers Regulations, 1950, which govern the manufacture and sale of boilers, every part/ component … the aforesaid deficiencies, the respondent is liable to be charged with unfair trade practices within the meaning of Sections 36-A(1)(i), (iii), (iv), (vi), (vii) and (viii) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (the MRTP … 1. The above listed Unfair Trade Practices Enquiry No. 47/ 89 and the Compensation Application No. 237/ 96 are connected matters arising
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Vs. Collector of Central Excise and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-04-1991
Land Acquisition
(1991)(37)LC604Tri(Delhi)
conceived, executed and formalised by an agreement; that even for the purpose of Section 2(f) of the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, the owner is not only the actual owner but any other person using the boiler which was hired … in different buildings. That a factory can be housed in more than one building is also clear from Section 4 of the Factories Act (d) Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Joint Secretary, Government of India
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. thermax (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-06-1993
Excise
(1994)(70)ELT247TriDel
related equipment. The boilers had to be manufactured and installed keeping in view the safety aspect. The Indian Boilers Act, 1923 provides mainly for the safety of life and property of persons from the dangers of explosion, prevention of … commissioning charges was allowable (Para 1.15); (10) The assessee have contravened the provisions of Rule 173C(1) read with Section 4, and Rules 5 and 7 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975, Rule 173F read with Rule 173G(i)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCalorex India Ltd. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Kolkata
May-11-1990
Company
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 14; ;State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29
[1991]72CompCas429(Cal)
trade is a very sophisticated one and is controlled by various provisions of the statute, viz., the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, and the rules framed thereunder. By reason whereof, this court directed the Chief Inspector of Boilers, West Bengal, … appearing in support of the application strenuously contended that by reason of the express provision as engrafted in Section 14 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and since no sanction or approval has been accorded … disclaimer as regards the registered office of the company. Admittedly, there are 45 employees in the registered office and the purchaser has an obligation to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »