Advanced Search Results

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

Act, 1961 vis a vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. 3. The Apprentices Act, 1961 was promulgated primarily for the purpose of recruiting the apprentices. The idea behind … to, the Apprenticeship Advisor can file an appropriate complaint before a competent court of law. In terms of Section 31 of the Act the only penalty which can be imposed upon the employer is fine which shall not

Collector of Central Excise Vs. thermax (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(70)ELT247TriDel

related equipment. The boilers had to be manufactured and installed keeping in view the safety aspect. The Indian Boilers Act, 1923 provides mainly for the safety of life and property of persons from the dangers of explosion, prevention of … such a plant were includible in the assessable value.6. The assessee had filed memorandum of Cross Objections under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), praying as under:- … analysed the show cause notice dated 4-8-1987, and the assessee's reply dated 31-12-1987 in detail, and came to the following findings:- (1) the assessee manufactures

Calorex India Ltd. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 14; ;State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas429(Cal)

trade is a very sophisticated one and is controlled by various provisions of the statute, viz., the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, and the rules framed thereunder. By reason whereof, this court directed the Chief Inspector of Boilers, West Bengal, … of the current assets by way of second charge. As on March 31, 1989, the total amount payable by the above-noted company to the corporation … appearing in support of the application strenuously contended that by reason of the express provision as engrafted in Section 14 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and since no sanction or approval has been accorded

M/S. Century Central Vs. State of Karnataka, Urban Development Departm ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

of "Applicable Acts" in clause (ia) of Section 2 of the Act. "Applicable Acts' means Factories Act, 1948, Boilers Act, 1923, Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Payment of … application of mind by the members of the SLSWCC and not an abdication of its duties and responsibilities. 31. Sub-section (2) of Section 6 uses the express'on "entrepreneurs" relating to industrial and otr.er projects. 'Entrepreneur' is defined

Mahesh a C Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted.-.106- 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable … KUNDAPUR - 578 229 SHIVAKUMAR N NO.63, BELEGERE NANJUNGUD TALUK MYSORE - 571 129 26.27. 28.29. HARSHA H.P30 31.32. H.R. PRAKASH33 34. HKANUTHUR VILLAGE AND POST MUDUGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMANGALORE K.V.NAGARAJ S/O VEERABHADRAPPA KALPUR POST CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND

A.C. Mahesh and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted. 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable … of their contentions, relied on the following decisions: 1. State of Bombay vs. F.N.Balsara (AIR (38) 1951 SC 318) 2. Zaverohai vs. State of Bombay (AIR 1954 SC 752) 3. R.M.D.C vs. Union of India (AIR 1957

Virender Singh Vs. Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd., Through the Manag ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25F; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 4(1), 4(4), 5, 7, 18, 22, 22(1), 33(2) and 33C(2); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR1159]; (2005)IILLJ856P& H; (2005)139PLR830

of Apprentices Act, 1961, vis-a-vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. Registration of the contract under sub-Section (4) of Section 4 of the Act of 1961 being mandatory or … 20.8.1990 came to the conclusion that the petitioner was entitled to wages from December 4, 1981 to December 31, 1986 and the management was directed to make the payment to the workman for 30 months and six

The State of Rajasthan Vs. Nawal Kishore and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1982WLN(UC)464

Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The respondents were tried for the offence under Section 6 of the Indian Boilers Act, 1923 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh. By the judgment dated … to be referred as 'the Act') by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh. By the judgment dated December 31, 1976 they were acquitted of the charge. The State of Rajasthan felt aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal

United India Insurance Company and ors. Vs. Tamuly L.N. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3 and 4A

92-A and 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 in relation to the liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 deals with no fault liability and is not relevant to the … fact of the death of his employee to the appellant on July 31, 1986 and since then the claim is pending before the appellant. The … sparks or ashes from the Motor Vehicle or caused by or arising out of the explosion of the boiler of the Motor Vehicle. (g) The Company shall not be liable in respect of death or bodily injury

L.Rs. of Natwar Lal Vs. Gotam and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN63

requirements of Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, in relation to liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, the Company shall not be liable in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person (other … sparks or ashes from the Motor Vehicle or caused by or arising out of the explosion of the boiler of the Motor Vehicle.(g) The Company shall not be liable in respect of death or bodily injury caused … Pursuant to the said direction, the trial Court passed an order on 31.03.2004, holding that the liability of the Insurance Company is limited to the