Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: boilers act 1923 section 13 · Page 1 of about 55 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 01 2004

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

Act, 1961 vis a vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. 3. The Apprentices Act, 1961 was promulgated primarily for the purpose of recruiting the apprentices. The idea behind … of apprenticeship which shall include the maintenance of such records of his work as may be prescribed.' 23. Section 13 regarding payment to apprentices which reads as under: '13. Payment to apprentices - (1) The employer shall pay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2014

A.C. Mahesh and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted. 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable … ((1977) 4 SCC 98) 8. Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. vs. State of U.P ((1980) 4 SCC 136) 9. Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs. State of Bihar ((1983) 4 SCC 45) 10. Prem Chand Jain vs. R.K.Chhabra

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2014

Mahesh a C Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted.-.106- 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable … MAESH JALWADI S/O MALLIKARJUNA0503.2010 AGED39YEARS H G SOMASHEKAR S/O H A GANGEGOWDA AGED36YEARS BEHIND T.B. SAKREPATNA - 577 135 KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT K RAJESH S/O K RAMESH SHET AGED37YEARS, DAIVAJNA COMPOUND BTR ROAD, OPP. M.G.PARK KUNDAPURA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 04 1991

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Vs. Collector of Central Excise and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)(37)LC604Tri(Delhi)

conceived, executed and formalised by an agreement; that even for the purpose of Section 2(f) of the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, the owner is not only the actual owner but any other person using the boiler which was hired … Date of orderNo. Cause Notice covered(a) 2464/86 02.02.1985 12.12.1984 Rs. 22,62,373.70 24.12.1985Deccan 15.04.1985 to(b) 2542/87 18.12.1985 28.11.1984 Rs. 13,11,346.42 29.10.1986Salem to(c) 2543/87 13.06.1985 08.04.1985 Rs. 13,84,362.00 29.10.1986Sakthi to 2. The facts relevant for determination of the dispute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1993

Collector of Central Excise Vs. thermax (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-06-1993

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(70)ELT247TriDel

related equipment. The boilers had to be manufactured and installed keeping in view the safety aspect. The Indian Boilers Act, 1923 provides mainly for the safety of life and property of persons from the dangers of explosion, prevention of … Thermax Pvt. Ltd. The Revenue was represented by Shri Prabhat Kumar, SDR 13. Shri V. Lakshmikumaran, the learned Advocate referred to the issue involved in … such a plant were includible in the assessable value.6. The assessee had filed memorandum of Cross Objections under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), praying as under:-

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2014

M/S. Century Central Vs. State of Karnataka, Urban Development Departm ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

of "Applicable Acts" in clause (ia) of Section 2 of the Act. "Applicable Acts' means Factories Act, 1948, Boilers Act, 1923, Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Payment of … entrepreneurs to set up industrial undertakings in the State. The functions of the Nodal Agency are stated in Section 13 of the Act. If a person is aggrieved by the decision of SLSWCC disapproving the project, he may

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2003

Director General (investigation Vs. thermax Private Limited

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : I(2003)CPJ158MRTP

submitted that it takes about 6-8 months to manufacture and assemble a boiler and that under the Indian Boilers Act, 1923 read with the Indian Boilers Regulations, 1950, which govern the manufacture and sale of boilers, every part/ component … the aforesaid deficiencies, the respondent is liable to be charged with unfair trade practices within the meaning of Sections 36-A(1)(i), (iii), (iv), (vi), (vii) and (viii) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (the MRTP … the respondent that it is grossly time-barred in terms of the Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2007

Khayali Lal and anr. Vs. Isamiya and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-01-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2009ACJ1019

requirements of Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, in relation to liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, the company shall not be liable in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person (other … sparks or ashes from the motor vehicle or caused by or arising out of the explosion of the boiler of the motor vehicle.(g) The company shall not be liable in respect of death or bodily injury caused

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2008

Shyam Sunder Agrawal Vs. Jawahar Prasad and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Feb-04-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR475]

Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation was justified in awarding compensation under Section 4(1)(b) & (c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 in the absence of medical evidence to prove the nature and the extent of disablement suffered by the … under the employment of the appellant/employer in the Shellac factory at Sakti.(B) Jawahar Prasad climbed up to the Boiler for removing the chelli (a temporary platform created with bamboos and ropes to facilitate work at the desired

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 1990

Calorex India Ltd. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-11-1990

Subject : Company

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 14; ;State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas429(Cal)

trade is a very sophisticated one and is controlled by various provisions of the statute, viz., the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, and the rules framed thereunder. By reason whereof, this court directed the Chief Inspector of Boilers, West Bengal, … appearing in support of the application strenuously contended that by reason of the express provision as engrafted in Section 14 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and since no sanction or approval has been accorded … assets of Calorex India Ltd. (in liquidation) at a price of Rs. 13.25 lakhs. Incidentally, it is to be noted that in the open auction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial