Advanced Search Results

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

Act, 1961 vis a vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, 1923. 3. The Apprentices Act, 1961 was promulgated primarily for the purpose of recruiting the apprentices. The idea behind … deals with practical and basic training of apprentices. 20. Section 10 deals with the related instruction of apprentices.21. Section 11 deals with the obligations of employers which is relevant for our purpose which reads as under:-'11. Obligations of

A.C. Mahesh and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted. 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable … vs. State of Bihar ((1983) 4 SCC 45) 10. Prem Chand Jain vs. R.K.Chhabra ((1984) 2 SCC 302) 11. Om Prakash vs. Akhilesh Kumar ((1986) Supp SCC 285) 12. India Cement Ltd. vs. State of T.N ((1990)

Mahesh a C Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the M.V.Act, 1988 cannot be accepted.-.106- 20. We may also state that sub-sec.(4A) of Section 5 of the Boilers Act, 1923 is similar to sub-sec.(4) of S.213 of the M.V.Act, 1988, whose subject matter of legislation is also relatable … KARNATAKA, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE560001 SRI B. P. NAVEEN S/O MR. PUTTASWAMI GOWDA4 5. 6.7.8. 9.10. 11.-.3- AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/O No.276/141, 9TH MAIN PIPELINE, VIJAYNAGAR BANGALORE - 560 040 SRI HUSSAIN SAB AGED ABOUT28YEARS RESIDING

Director General (investigation Vs. thermax Private Limited

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : I(2003)CPJ158MRTP

submitted that it takes about 6-8 months to manufacture and assemble a boiler and that under the Indian Boilers Act, 1923 read with the Indian Boilers Regulations, 1950, which govern the manufacture and sale of boilers, every part/ component … the aforesaid deficiencies, the respondent is liable to be charged with unfair trade practices within the meaning of Sections 36-A(1)(i), (iii), (iv), (vi), (vii) and (viii) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (the MRTP

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Vs. Collector of Central Excise and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)(37)LC604Tri(Delhi)

conceived, executed and formalised by an agreement; that even for the purpose of Section 2(f) of the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, the owner is not only the actual owner but any other person using the boiler which was hired … such staff were made by M/s. TNPL.7. Among the grounds taken in the appeals are that under notification 118/75-CE dated 30.4.1975 the goods falling under item 68 were exempt from duty provided they were intended for use

Collector of Central Excise Vs. thermax (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(70)ELT247TriDel

related equipment. The boilers had to be manufactured and installed keeping in view the safety aspect. The Indian Boilers Act, 1923 provides mainly for the safety of life and property of persons from the dangers of explosion, prevention of … such a plant were includible in the assessable value.6. The assessee had filed memorandum of Cross Objections under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), praying as under:- … amounting to Rs. 65,33,098/- was demanded under Rule 9(2) read with Section 11A(1) of the Act, besides invoking penal provisions under the Act and the

Calorex India Ltd. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 14; ;State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Section 29

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas429(Cal)

trade is a very sophisticated one and is controlled by various provisions of the statute, viz., the Indian Boilers Act, 1923, and the rules framed thereunder. By reason whereof, this court directed the Chief Inspector of Boilers, West Bengal, … appearing in support of the application strenuously contended that by reason of the express provision as engrafted in Section 14 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and since no sanction or approval has been accorded … the above-noted company to the corporation was to the extent of Rs. 11,29,410.72. The abovenoted company, however, committed a default in the matter of repayment

United India Insurance Company and ors. Vs. Tamuly L.N. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3 and 4A

92-A and 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 in relation to the liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 deals with no fault liability and is not relevant to the … Vehicle or caused by or arising out of the explosion of the boiler of the Motor Vehicle. (g) The Company shall not be liable in … are quoted herein below :- Limits of Liability - Limit of the amount of the Company's liability under Section 11-1(i) in respect of any one accident. Such amount as is necessary to meet the requirements of the Motor

Shyam Sunder Agrawal Vs. Jawahar Prasad and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR475]

Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation was justified in awarding compensation under Section 4(1)(b) & (c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 in the absence of medical evidence to prove the nature and the extent of disablement suffered by the … under the employment of the appellant/employer in the Shellac factory at Sakti.(B) Jawahar Prasad climbed up to the Boiler for removing the chelli (a temporary platform created with bamboos and ropes to facilitate work at the desired … India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Abdul Gafur and Anr. 2004 (Suppl.) GLT 118 that the appellants did not question the disability certificate, and therefore, it

L.Rs. of Natwar Lal Vs. Gotam and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN63

requirements of Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, in relation to liability under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, the Company shall not be liable in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person (other … sparks or ashes from the Motor Vehicle or caused by or arising out of the explosion of the boiler of the Motor Vehicle.(g) The Company shall not be liable in respect of death or bodily injury caused