Advanced Search Results

Shamsher Bahadur Sinha Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Service Code, 1952 - Rule 97(2)

further directed that the respondents shall pay the said amount within a period of four months from today. Bihar Service Code, 1952 - Rule 97(2)--Payment of salary--During suspension period--Order for recovery--Not to be passed unless finding of committing misconduct recorded--Quashed--Departmental

Rana Subodh Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Bihar Pension Rules - Rule 43; Bihar Service Code, 1952 - Rule 97

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR73]

BLJ 310. In the said case, the Court taking into consideration the provision of Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code, 1952 held that if an employee superannuated while he was under suspension and no order passed either to impose

Anant Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar (Jharkhand) Service Code, 1952 - Rules 96 and 97; Bihar (Jharkhand) Pension Rules, 1950 - Rules 43B and 99

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR776(Jhr)]

revised scale of pay? 5. The counsel for the petitioners relied on Rule 97 of the Bihar (Jharkhand) Service Code, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Service Code) and a Division Bench decision of Patna High Court in the … Code, the Division Bench held, as follows :-- 'In our view, the provisions of Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code, as referred to above, is not applicable, to the present case, Because, admittedly, in this case, neither any

Kishori Lal Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Pension Rules - Rule 139; Bihar Service Code - Rules 85, 96, 97(1), 97(3), 103 and 139

the purposes of pensionary service, as bad for non compliance of a notice under Rule 97(3) of the Bihar Service Code. It was next submitted that the financial benefit of the increment actually denied to him as a punishment … such payment be made. The writ application is allowed to the extent indicated with directions. Bihar Service Code, 1952-Rule 97(3)-Withholding of salary for the period of suspension-No notice issued to Petitioner-Impugned Order is violative of Rule 97(3)-Petitioner

Kantu Prasad Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Court : Patna

Subject : Land Acquisition

be invalid as no reasonable opportunity to the officer to show cause was given. Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code, 1952, is in pari meteria with rule 54 of the Fundamental Rules. The petitioner, therefore, ought to have been

Prasenjit Ghosh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Service Code, 1952 - Rule 97

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR201(Jhr)]

in 2000 (3) BLJ 278, AIR 1984 SC 380 and 1990 (1) SCC 296.5. Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code lays down the provisions with regard to such a situation. Rule 97 reads as under :'97. (1) When

Hira Prasad Pandey Vs. the High Court of Judicature at Patna and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR12(Jhr)]

Officer is entitled to get full salary for the period of suspension as per Rule 97 of the Bihar Service Code, 1952 and shall also be entitled for all other consequential benefits, including promotion, if any, to which he was

Nand Kumar Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Service Code - Rule 74

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR560(Jhr)]

Court of Jharkhand High Court, he was made to retire, in public interest under Rule 74(b)(ii) of the Bihar Service Code, 1952 by Order No. 2254 dated 17th July, 2001, issued by the Government of Jharkhand from its Personnel, Administrative

Rana Abhai Singh Vs. the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna and ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 437(6); Bihar Service Code, 1952 - Rules 56, 73, 74 and 74(3); Bihar Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 2004; Patna High Court Rules, 1916 - Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 235 and 309

Superior Judicial Service, in the State of Bihar, in terms of the provisions of Rule 74(b)(ii) of the Bihar Service Code, 1952 (Bihar Code) and denying him the benefit of the extended age from 58 to 60 years, passed by

Brij Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

federal Constitution.--Calhoun. v. City of Seattle, 215 F. 226. 30. In AIR 1952 SC 252: The State of Bihar. Vs. Sir Kameshwar Singh, Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with Article 31 (4) of the Constitution, held that … 34 Sct. 92, 231 U.S. 250, 58 L.Ed. 206. W.D.Wash. 1914. Judicial Code, Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1162, 28 U.S.C.A. $$ … Bhusan Bose. Vs. Rama Sundari Debi and another; 2006 (10) ADJ 86: Sumac Intl. Ltd. Vs. PNB Capital Services and the Official Liquidator, High Court of Allahabad and Uttaranchal; (1998) 5 SCC 637: State of Tripura. Vs. … to be violative of the directives issued by the Central Government under rule 8(iv) of the Census Rules, 1990, in view of Article 246(1) of … Planning and Reproductive Health Ass'n. INc. v. Sullivan, 979 F.2d 227, 298 U.S. App. D.C. 288.--Admn. Law