Advanced Search Results

Bihar State Electricity Board, and anr. Vs. Ram Deo Prasad Singh, and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Section 89; Reorganisation Act - Section 62; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 ; Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9 Rule 4; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ; Industrial Establishment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

this Court assailing the judgments and decree passed against them. 4. In view of section 89 of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 the judgments of the High Court and the first appellate court appear to be manifestly illegal and without

Suresh Prasad Jaiswal and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 395

Magistrate, 1stClass, Patna be transferred to the corresponding Court in the State of Jharkhand.The petition is allowed accordingly. Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, Section 89 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 395--Transfer of complaint case--Commission of offence was complete the moment the petitioners

C.B.i., A.H.D., Patna Vs. Braj Bhushan Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89 and 89(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1), 4, 4(2), 13 and 13(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 178 to 180 and 181(4); Minnesota Constitution - Sections 1 - Schedule - Article 9; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : 2001VIIIAD(SC)356; AIR2001SC4014; 2001CriLJ4683; JT2001(8)SC348; 2001(6)SCALE641; (2001)9SCC432

the erstwhile State of Bihar got itself bifurcated into two States by the Act of Parliament called The Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (for short 'the Act'). One region of it became a new State called Jharkhand while the remaining region … erstwhile State of Bihar is the result of the operation of a statutory provision incorporated in the Act. Section 89 of the said Act reads thus:'89(1) Every proceeding pending immediately before the appointed day before a court (other

A. Arjehanul Gouri Vs. Jharkhand High Court Through the Registrar Gene ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89; Jharkhand Service Code - Rule 74; Constitution of India - Articles 311 and 235

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR526(Jhr)]

to have been initiated. Mr. Jha urged that the entire exercise against the petitioner was in violation of Section 89 of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, and also in violation of the principles of natural justice.6. In support … which was withdrawn by him on 3rd May, 2001 as in the meantime, after the enactment of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, the petitioner was ordered to report to the Jharkhand cadre.3. Soon thereafter, by order dated 17th July, 2001

Bihar State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Ram Deo Prasad Singh and or ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89 and 89(1); Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 - Order 9, Rules 2, 3 and 4 - Order 41, Rule 11

learned lower appellate court had the jurisdiction to hear the title appeal after coming into force of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for the sake of brevity)6. So far the first question is concerned, … by the provision of the limitation Act.8. So far the third question raised by the appellants is concerned, Section 89 of the Act reads as follows:Transfer of pending proceedings-(1) Every proceeding pending immediately before the appointed day before

Vishwanath Ganguly Son of Late Dr. B.P. Ganguly Vs. the Stats of Bihar ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 89, 89(1) and 89(2)

trial commenced in the court of Special Judge, Vigilance at Patna.4. By an Act of Parliament, namely, the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), the erstwhile State of Bihar was reorganized into two States, namely, the … for transfer of the case to the competent court at Ranchi, inter alia, contending that in terms of Section 89 of the Act jurisdiction lies with the court of corresponding jurisdiction at Jharkhand. It seems that no decision

Abhay Nath Manjhi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

before the appointed day, therefore, the instant provision would not apply to his case. (viii) Provisions relating to Section 89 of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 would also not apply to the case of the petitioner as no … (ii) The State of Jharkhand had come into existence on the appointed day as per the provisions of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 i.e., 15th November, 2000. (iii) The State of Jharkhand was therefore not the employer of the petitioner and

Abhay Nath Manjhi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

before the appointed day, therefore, the instant provision would not apply to his case. (viii) Provisions relating to Section 89 of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 would also not apply to the case of the petitioner as no … (ii) The State of Jharkhand had come into existence on the appointed day as per the provisions of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 i.e., 15th November, 2000. (iii) The State of Jharkhand was therefore not the employer of the petitioner and

The C.B.i. (A.H.D.) Vs. Braj Bhushan Prasad and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

place at Patna.(J) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 154 and 156--FIR--Investigation, inquiry and trial--Jurisdiction of Police Officer.(K) Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Section 89(1)--Word 'exclusively' used in Section 89--Meaning of--Animal Husbandry Scam cases--Whether triable by Patna Court in State

State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

in Cr.W.J.C. No.352 of 2002. By the impugned judgment the High Court giving reference to the provisions of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 held that the impugned FIR instituted on 20th August, 2002 by State of Bihar, much after the appointed … Single Judge held that in the present case it is Section 76 of the Reorganisation Act and not Section 89 of the Reorganisation Act which is applicable and in that case the Vigilance Department of the State of