Advanced Search Results

The State of Karnataka by Its Chief Secretary Vs. State of Tamil Nadu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

undivided State of Bihar with the newly bifurcated State that have come into existence by virtue of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (for short, ―the 2000 Act‖). The controversy also related to the service conditions. The issue arose before the … Kabini and Bhawani were in the Malabar District, which had been transferred to it. It also referred to Section 87 of the Reorganisation Act, whereunder any contract made by an existing State before the appointed day in the

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Kamal Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

15.11.2000, the State of Jharkhand was created by bifurcation of the State of Bihar by the Act of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. It is the case of the respondent-employees that as per Section 72 of the Act of 2000, the

RobIn Tirkey Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Bihar Police Manual Rules - Rules 663 and 666; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16 and 226; Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 85

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR62(Jhr)]

constables have been adopted with relaxations and modifications, in purported exercise of power under Section 85 of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the advertisement No. 1/2004 issued by the respondent No. 3 whereby … reported in (1995) 5 SCC 482, Kailash Chandra Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., 2003 (1) JCR 87 (SC) : (2002) 6 SCC 562 and in the case of Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur v. Daulat

Uttaranchal Forest Rangers' Asson. (Direct Recruit) and Ors. Vs. State ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 8 and 73(1); Service Rules; Seniority Rules, 1991 - Rules 8, 8(1), 8(3), 26, 31 and 39; Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Seniority Rules, 1991 - Rule 8(1); Uttaranchal Government Servant Seniority Rules, 2002; Uttaranchal Subordinate Services Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Bihar Forest Service Rules - Rules 3 and 35; Public Service Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1970 - Rules 13 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1) and 309

Reported in : JT2006(12)SC513; 2006(9)SCALE577; 2007(2)SLJ133(SC)

done in February, 2004 with effect from 9.11.2004 by the Government of India under Section 73(1) of U.P. Reorganisation Act, 2000 till the stage of this final allotment, any dispute pertaining to their seniority was obviously the matter of … same time equality is accorded to all the employees.14. In Sanjay Kumar Sinha and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors. : AIR2004SC3460 , this Court observed that,6. In our view the first point regarding alleged non-

Aligarh Muslim University versus Naresh Agarwal & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.1647

Legislative Assembly, unsuccessfully recommending the establishment of four new Provinces from the former Madras Presidency. Ultimately, the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 enabled the division of States on a linguistic basis, aligning administrative boundaries with the linguistic identities of … examinations to confer degrees.90 However, teaching universities also had to be incorporated 87 See Section XIII and XIV of the enactments; Also see Section 14 … of linguistic and religious minorities protected by Article 29(1). In Rev. Father W. Proost v. The State of Bihar,115 a Constitution Bench answered the question in the negative. The Bench held that Article 30(1) covers a minority … the law relating to the Universities at Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and Allahabad. Section 3 of the Act provided that the University shall have the power