Advanced Search Results

Arvind Vijay Bilung with V.N. Mishra Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Bihar Re-organisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 71, 72, 72(1), (2), (3), 74, 74(1) and 76; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115(2), (3), (4), 116, 116(1), (2) and 117

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR336

Forest Officer, Minor Forest Material Project Division, Jamshedpur (now in the State of Jharkhand).4. At that stage the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (Central Act, No. 30 of 2000), hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 2000', was enacted which became operative … the members of aforesaid two services, even provisionally. 9. Learned counsel for the State of Bihar relied on Section 72 of the Reorganisation Act, 2000, to suggest that the present 'State of Bihar is the disciplinary authority … In the case of N. Chandramoull v.State of Mysore, AIR 1971 Mys 53, takinginto consideration the aforesaid provisions ofReorganisation Act, 1956, the Court held Section

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Lafarge Dealers Association

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 79 of the Reorganisation Act which are in pari materia to Sections 84 and 85 of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, we would like to reproduce paragraphs 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 of Swarn Rekha (supra), which read … SLP (C) No.23592 of 2014 & Ors.Page 31 of 38 contentions raised related to the true interpretation of Section 53 of the Andhra State Act, 1953, the argument being that though for political purposes the State of Andhra

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Kamal Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

15.11.2000, the State of Jharkhand was created by bifurcation of the State of Bihar by the Act of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. It is the case of the respondent-employees that as per Section 72 of the Act of 2000, the … of the High Court has erroneously applied to the cases of respondent-employees and the directions contained at para 53 of Umadevi’s case since the respondents continued in service with the appellants at the instance of court’s interim

Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56(1), 56(2), 62(2), 64, 64(2), 181, 185 and 185(2); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22(1), 22(2), 29, 45, 82 and 85(1); Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 62(4); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Tariff) Regulations, 2003 - Regulations 20 and 21

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar60; 2008(56)BLJR412; [2008(1)JCR580(Jhr)]

Under Section 29 of the said Act.28. After creation of State of Jharkhand under the provision of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, the State Government in exercise of its power under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 read with Section 62(4)

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

officer”) of the Chemical Weapons Convention Act, 2000; Section 80 (“any officer subordinate to the Board”) of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000; Section 81 (“any officer subordinate to the Board”) of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000; Section 26 (“such officer … the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; 18 by Parliament/State Legislature. Somewhat similar expression has been used in Articles 53, 154 and 311 of the Constitution of India and in other legislations39 enacted by Parliament/State Legislature with little

State of Uttaranchal Vs. Alok Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 66; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13, 14, 16, 136, 142, 162, 226 and 309; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Uttar Pradesh Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government of Public Corporations in Government Services Rules, 1991 - Rules 2 and 3(1); Education Code - Article 45

Reported in : [2009(121)FLR816]; JT2009(6)SC463; 2009(6)SCALE277; (2009)7SCC647; 2009(5)LC2201(SC)

as the names of the companies having not been mentioned in the IX Schedule appended to the U.P. Reorganisation Act, 2000, as envisaged under Section 66 thereof, the State of Uttarakhand and for that matter, her client had no … v. Bahadur Singh and Ors. : (2009)IILLJ593SC Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Ors. : (2008)10SCC1 , State of Bihar v. Upendra Narayan Singh and Ors. : (2009)5SCC65 ]16. In case of liquidation of the companies, the employees

Avtar Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now C.G.)

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

State of Madhya Pradesh and formation of the new State of Chhattisgarh by virtue of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 (No. 28 of 2000), the Chief Justice of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur has transferred … imperil defence. Learned Senior Advocate relied upon the matter of Lakshmi Singh and Ors. etc. v. State of Bihar in which the Apex Court has held that if the witnesses could go to the extent of falsely … & 307 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. Paras 1 & 53 of the order dated 9-12-1987 read as follows:1- This revision has been … Sessions Judge after holding the appellant guilty for commission of offence under Sections 302 read with Section 34, 307 read with Section 34 of the

Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Notification of the Central Government would not suffice in this case, since Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 would specifically provide for the abolition through Notification. But, such a provision is not available in this State. … the present 19 (2018) 4 SCC49437 PART D case. The locus classicus on this subject is State of Bihar v. D N Ganguly20, where this Court held: “9. … It is well settled that this section embodies … the beginning of 2014. During the calendar year 2014, 7417 cases were 53 PART D disposed whereas 13,823 fresh cases were instituted. At the end

Akhilesh Prasad Vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

benefits of existing employees and officials in the erstwhile state of 3 Bihar, which was bifurcated by the Bihar Reorganisation Act in 2000, and its effect on the respondent.4. The Constitution uses the expression “in relation to”, in both … 115 (7), States Re-organization Act, 1956; Sections 69-70 Madhya Pradesh Re-organization Act, 2000; Sections 74-75 Uttar Pradesh Re-organization Act, 2000; Section 78, Andhra Pradesh Re-organization Act, 2014 8 and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, by

Hindu Seva Kendram, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

2(4) 203 (in Malabar district as referred to in sub- section (2) of Section 5 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956)70. Kammara 3(1) 71 (excluding Malabar district as referred to in sub-section (2) of section 5 of the … “MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT RESOLUTION New Delhi, the 4th April, 2000 No. 12011/36/99-BCC.-The Government of India, vide the Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances … the State Services as on the date of judgment of the Supreme Court: WP(C):13730/2021 471. Andhra Pradesh2. Assam3. Bihar4. Goa5. Gujarat6. Haryana7. Himachal Pradesh8. Karnataka9. Kerala10. Madhya Pradesh xx xxx xxxx4. The Common Lists prepared by the … in Wayanad, it is 31.8%. As early as in the year 1970, 53.31 % of Muslim populations in Kerala are either employed, employers or salaried.