Advanced Search Results

V.K. Walnekar and ors. Vs. Bilaspur Raipur Kshetriya GramIn Bank and a ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 21, 22, 23, 25, 28, 33, 78 and 79; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 49, 52, 54 and 57; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 108; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Sections 84 and 85; Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 141 and 225; Madhya Pradesh Uchaha Nyayalay (Letters Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981

Reported in : AIR2006Chh92

of Chhattisgarh came into existence on 1st of November 2000, that is the appointed day, pursuant to M.P. Reorganisation Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2000). It is a successor State. Part IV of the Act … the decision rendered in the matter of Sharda Devi v. State of Bihar ( : [2002]2SCR404 which is also quoted in Subal Pauls case that9. … use the word like successor High Court at any place. There is also not any such section like Section 49 of the Act of 1956 which provided a deeming fiction regarding the High Courts after formation of the

Kapila Hingorani and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 47(1), 56, 65 and 85; Companies Act - Sections 529A; State Reorganisation Act, 2000; Contempt of Courts Act, 1970; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR785]; [2008(3)JCR129(SC)]; (2008)IIILLJ1012SC; 2008(10)SCALE15

continued to be under the control of the Government of Bihar in terms of Section 65 of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. It was, therefore, pleaded in that paragraph that BHALCO and JHALCO were two different corporations having no connection … - Held, No time limit is prescribed, but retraction has to be made within a reasonable time. Section 49(6); Grant of bail Conspiracy to kill Hindu leaders by training boys in Pakistan FIR lodged against many accused

Rajesh Kumar and Ors Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Sections 84 and 85 need to be examined. On 15.11.2000, State of Jharkhand was created under the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Section 84 made the law inforce in the existing State of Bihar immediately before the appointed day applicable in

Bihar State Forest Development Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66 and 84

of the State Government, vide Annexure A to Annexure 6.4. However in the year 2000 the Parliament (sic) Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 and in pursuance thereof a new State to be known as 'State of Jharkhand' was created comprising the … of which the share of the State of Bihar is 51% and 49% is of the Government of India. According to the petitioner, in almost … the same and at the same time by this activities, to create employment among the rural and weaker sections of people living in concerned area. The Corporation in its 86th Board's meeting dated 10.8.2000 approved shifting of

Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56(1), 56(2), 62(2), 64, 64(2), 181, 185 and 185(2); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22(1), 22(2), 29, 45, 82 and 85(1); Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 62(4); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Tariff) Regulations, 2003 - Regulations 20 and 21

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar60; 2008(56)BLJR412; [2008(1)JCR580(Jhr)]

Under Section 29 of the said Act.28. After creation of State of Jharkhand under the provision of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, the State Government in exercise of its power under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 read with Section 62(4) … decisions of the Supreme Court in District Registrar and Collector v. Canara Bank reported in (2005) 1 SCC 496 and in CST v. Shri Krishna Engineering Co. reported in (2005) 2 SCC 692. Secondly, where there is

Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Notification of the Central Government would not suffice in this case, since Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 would specifically provide for the abolition through Notification. But, such a provision is not available in this State. … the present 19 (2018) 4 SCC49437 PART D case. The locus classicus on this subject is State of Bihar v. D N Ganguly20, where this Court held: “9. … It is well settled that this section embodies

Hindu Seva Kendram, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

2(4) 203 (in Malabar district as referred to in sub- section (2) of Section 5 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956)70. Kammara 3(1) 71 (excluding Malabar district as referred to in sub-section (2) of section 5 of the … “MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT RESOLUTION New Delhi, the 4th April, 2000 No. 12011/36/99-BCC.-The Government of India, vide the Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances … the State Services as on the date of judgment of the Supreme Court: WP(C):13730/2021 471. Andhra Pradesh2. Assam3. Bihar4. Goa5. Gujarat6. Haryana7. Himachal Pradesh8. Karnataka9. Kerala10. Madhya Pradesh xx xxx xxxx4. The Common Lists prepared by the … and Kalavara Chetties) 13 3411. Devadigi 14 3712. Devanga 15 38 WP(C):13730/2021 4913. Dheevara 15A 39 (Araya, Arayavathi 15A 7 Mukkuvan or Mukayo- 5A 38,

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Section 3, 4; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Section 5(1), 6, 11(5), 11(2), 11(4), 17A, 17A(3), 2, 4(3), 4A, 15, 10(1), 13(2)(e), 16(1)(b), 17(1), 17A(1)(A), 18A(6), 21(5), 28, 30, 11, 7, 16(1), 9, 13(2)(a), 13, 18A(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Rules 1960 - Rule 59(2), 58; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Section 84, 85, 86, 3, 4(a); Central Act 67 of 1957 - Sections 16(1)(b), 17, 13, 9; U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 ; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Section 2; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115;

was carved out of the erstwhile State of Bihar and it came into existence by virtue of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Section 85 of that Act provides that the appropriate Government may before expiration of two years adapt and/or modify … operations; (h) “prospecting operations” means any operations undertaken for the purpose of exploring, locating or proving mineral deposits;” 49. The original Section 4 in 1957 Act read as follows :“S.4. (1) No person shall undertake any prospecting

Praveen Kumar Agrawal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Mines Nationalisation (Amendment) Bill, 2000; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR354(Jhr)]

Corporation was a Corporation controlled by the State of Bihar. On the reorganisation of the State under the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000, the Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the JSMDC) was formed and according to it, … Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation was to hold only shares not exceeding 49 percent. The petitioner has approached this Court with the writ petition contending … enforced.4. On behalf of the Union of India, a counter affidavit is filed. It is submitted that under Section 3(3) of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act. 1973, commercial coal mining is permitted only by the Central Government,

Ganesh Jee Pathak vs Resident Commissioner Govt. of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

13 Petitioner remained the same in the Law Department, Government of Bihar, New Delhi.4. In pursuance of the Reorganisation Act, 2000, the State of Bihar wasre-organized into two successor State, namely Bihar and Jharkhand, which came into effect from … into effect from 15.11.2000. The Central Government had been empowered to allocate employees to both the States under Section 72 of the Bihar Re-organisation Act, 2000. The Petitioner was allocated to the State of Jharkhand. He remained … DRJ 546 and Roshan Lal and Ors. vs. DTC, (2007) 140 DLT 49, held that whenever an amount is illegally withheld by a party, interest