Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: bengal excise act 1909 section 75 · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.029 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 11 1913

Upendra Nath Biswas Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-11-1913

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal694

been convicted by the Fourth Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta, of offences under Sections 46 and 48 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 210 under fee latter section; no separate sentence has been … way of appeal under Section 410 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and reference was made to Sections 75 and 81 of the Bengal Excise Act to show that the Code has a restricted application to proceedings

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1914

Prokash Chandra Kundu Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-03-1914

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal836

without warrant persons found illicitly distilling liquor--Search--Formalities before search--Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860) as. 147 and 353--Bengal Excise Act (Ben. V of 1909) Sections 67 and 70--Rules by Local Government --Rule 75--Instructions of Board of Revenue--Chapter X, … of the formalities required by law, the resistance offered to them was not unlawful, and the conviction under Section 147 is bad in law; and, secondly, that the excise officers were not acting in the exercise of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2024

State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-23-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

1077; Section 3(10) 158 Similar definitions in Bihar and Orissa Excise Act 1915; Sections 2(14); 2(19) 159 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(12a) 160 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(14) 161 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(19) Page … of 123 PART E a. Precedent on the interpretation of ‘intoxicating liquor’: exploring FN Balsara and Southern Pharmaceuticals 75. The respondents have relied on the interpretation of the phrase ‘intoxicating liquor’ in the judgment of the Bombay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 1917

Amrita Lal Bose and ors. Vs. the Corporation of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-15-1917

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 42Ind.Cas.305

of the use of the expression offence punishable being used in this sense may be found in the Bengal Excise Act, 1909. Section 46 of that Act provides for the punishment of, persons and Section 56 refers to 'any offence punishable … Naylor (1596) Noy 52: 74 E. R. 1021: Moore (K. B.) 453: 72 E. R. 689: Goulds. 145: 75 E. R. 1054: Cro. Eliz, 480: 78 E. R. 731, held that on the language of Regulation XXI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1934

AmIn Shariff Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-21-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1934Cal580,150Ind.Cas.561

25, Evidence Act. As a branch of this ground Mr. Pal has also argued that Under Section 74, Bengal Excise Act, 1909, an Excise Officer is a Police Officer within the meaning of Section 162, Criminal P. C. and any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1958

Shri Vasudeva Bank, Ltd., by Its Managing Director, N.V. Swaminatha Iy ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-09-1958

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1959)2MLJ165

Khaloon v. M.B. Ahmad : AIR1950All56 , Uday Chand v. Province of Bengal I.L.R. (1947) Cal. 141; Ram Gulam v. U.P. Government : AIR1950All206 , … Rs. 1,279-11-0 payable in respect of the beedi tabacco. The attachment was under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The entire proceedings of the Department in the matter of detention of cheroot tobacco belonging Rahamatullah in respect … I of 1904, Section 3(20). Burma Act I of 1898, Section 2(25) E.B. & A. Act I of 1909, Section 5(21); Madras Act I of 1891, Section 3(11); Punjab ActI of 1898, Section 2(22) ; U.P. Act 1 … India I.L.R.(1904) 28 Bom. 314; Mohammed v. Uttar Pradesh A.I.R. (1955) U.P. 75. The principle of these cases was stated to be that the act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial