Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: bengal excise act 1909 section 55 · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.024 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 01 1912

Mati Lal Chandra Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-01-1912

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)ILR39Cal1053

is foreign liquor and has paid the full duty imposed thereon by the Indian Tariff Act or the Bengal Excise Act. But this is rather discounted by another letter from the same gentleman to the Collector of Hooghly in … excisable articles from Chandernagore to Calcutta under Section 46, Act V of 1909, and of being in possession of excisable articles knowing the same to … knowing the same to have been unlawfully imported under Section 52 of the same Act, both read with Section 55 of the Act, and sentenced them under Section 57 to a fine of Rs. 1,000 each, or in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2024

State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-23-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

1077; Section 3(10) 158 Similar definitions in Bihar and Orissa Excise Act 1915; Sections 2(14); 2(19) 159 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(12a) 160 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(14) 161 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(19) Page … 52 I. The meaning of ‘that is to say’ ............................................................ 52 II. Product or industry based entry .......................................................... 55 Page 3 of 123 b. Scope of Entry 52 of List I: the absence of “to the extent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1934

AmIn Shariff Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-21-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1934Cal580,150Ind.Cas.561

25, Evidence Act. As a branch of this ground Mr. Pal has also argued that Under Section 74, Bengal Excise Act, 1909, an Excise Officer is a Police Officer within the meaning of Section 162, Criminal P. C. and any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 03 1965

Pritpal Singh Rattan Singh Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Delhi and anr ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-03-1965

Subject : Excise

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 3(14), 5, 18, 58 and 59; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 47, 301, 305 and 366(10); Delhi Intoxicating Spirituous Preparations, Import Export, Transport, Possession and Sale Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 3A, 12 and 13; Delhi Intoxicating Spirituous Preparations, Import Export, Transport, Possession and Sale (Amendment) Rules, 1961

Reported in : AIR1966P& H4

found in the Act.The statutory provision in regard to liquor in Sections 3 (14) and 4 in the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 (Bengal Act 5 of 1909), is again verbatim the same as in the Act. There is no parallel … Rules.2. The first notification of December 7, 1961, has been issued by the Chief Commissioner of Delhi under Section 3 (14) of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (Punjab Act I of 1914), as in force in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2005

Khalek Shaik Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-21-2005

Subject : CriminalExcise

Acts : Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 46, 46A, 73, 73(2), 74, 74(4) and 81(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 41, 41(1), 55, 100, 160 to 171, 173, 190 and 244 to 247

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN483

passed by the Id. Judicial Magistrate 1st Court, Diamond Harbour in Case No. C.80/96 under Section 46A(e)(ii) of Bengal Excise Act.2. The miniaturized version of the prosecution is that on 17.01.96 at about 10.30 a.m. the present petitioner was … 46, 46A etc. any of the powers [conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Sections 41 & 55 of the Code] by a police officer or Officer-in-Charge of a police station. In other words, an excise

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1995

Shree Electronics Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-1995

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT407TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2006

Rita Shaw and ors. Vs. Dipendra Lal Shaw and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-03-2006

Subject : Excise

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 14; ;Indian Trusts Act - Section 6; ;Bengal Excise Act - Section 86; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 31 and 42; ;Bengal Excise Act, 1909; ;Income Tax Act - Section 185; ;Bengal Excise Rules - Rules 207, 208 and 209; ;Hindu Law

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN414

is excise license, without which this business cannot be operated, and this again, under the provisions of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and rules thereof, is in the nature of a personal privilege, and not a mere incidence of the … and marked 'Exhibit 5' runs contrary to law, being hit by the rule against perpetuity, as contained in Section 14 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It is also the case of the plaintiffs that exclusion

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1912

Emperor Vs. Moti Lal Chander and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-01-1912

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : 15Ind.Cas.961

is foreign liquor and has paid the full duty imposed thereon by the Indian Tariff Act or the Bengal Excise Act. But this is rather discounted by another letter from the same gentleman to the Collector of Hughly in … articles from Chander nagare to Calcutta under Section 46, Act V of 1909, and of being in possession of exciseable articles knowing the same to … articles knowing the same to have been unlawfully imported under Section 52 of the same Act read with Section 55 of the Act and sentenced them both under Section 57 to a fine of Rs. 1,000 each or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1975

Har Shankar and ors. Vs. the Dy. Excise and Taxation Commr. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-1975

Subject : Excise

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 3(9), 5, 8, 16, 17, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 24, 24(4), 26, 27, 27(2), 34, 34(1), 35(2), 36, 43, 56, 58, 59, 60 and 60(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Cochin Abkari Act; Bombay Lotteries and Prize Competition Control and Tax Act, 1948; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rules 1, 11, 12, 23, 24, 27A, 28, 30, 31, 35, 36, 36 (23-A), 59 and 103(1); Punjab Liquor Licence (First Amendment) Rules, 1968 - Rule 27-A; Prohibition and Excise Laws; Federal law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 47, 132(1), 133(1), 226, 298 and 301; Ajmer Excise Regulation - Regulation 1915; Bombay Abkari Act, 1878; Bengal Excise Act, 1909; Madras Abkari Act, 1886; Eastern Bensal and Assam Excise Act, 1910; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1975SC1121; (1975)1SCC737; [1975]3SCR254; MANU/SC/0321/1975

[1973]1SCR533 , a Constitution Bench of this Court had to consider the question whether Section 43 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 under which the licence of a liquor contractor was withdrawn, violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. … may be employed and they are not protected either by Article 19(1)(g) or Article 301 of our Constitution. 55. This decision was also cited before the Court in Krishna Kumar's case but it said : 'This decision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 1994

Khoday Distilleries Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(2), 19(6), 47. 300A, 301 and 304; Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Wholesale Trade, Distribution and Retail Trade in Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor, Wine and Beer) Act, 1993

Reported in : JT1994(6)SC588; 1994(4)SCALE528; (1995)1SCC574; [1994]Supp4SCR477; MANU/SC/0572/1995

then referred to the contention on behalf of the appellant that the provisions of Section 43 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 which empowered the licensing authority to withdraw the licence for any reason whatsoever not falling under Section 42

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial