Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: bengal excise act 1909 section 49 · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 21 1934

AmIn Shariff Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-21-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1934Cal580,150Ind.Cas.561

25, Evidence Act. As a branch of this ground Mr. Pal has also argued that Under Section 74, Bengal Excise Act, 1909, an Excise Officer is a Police Officer within the meaning of Section 162, Criminal P. C. and any … later there was a case in the Rangoon High Court, Maung San Myin v. Emperor AIR 1930 Rang 49, where it was held that although the Excise Officer concerned in the case had powers of arrest, search,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2024

State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-23-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

1077; Section 3(10) 158 Similar definitions in Bihar and Orissa Excise Act 1915; Sections 2(14); 2(19) 159 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(12a) 160 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(14) 161 The Bengal Excise Act 1909; Section 2(19) Page … (4th edn.) [25.57]. 2340-2341. 85 United Province v. Atiqa Begum, (1940) FCR110 Constitution of India, Article 13 Page 49 of 123 PART E d. ‘Subject to’ law made by Parliament or ‘subject to’ any limitations imposed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1975

Har Shankar and ors. Vs. the Dy. Excise and Taxation Commr. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-1975

Subject : Excise

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 3(9), 5, 8, 16, 17, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 24, 24(4), 26, 27, 27(2), 34, 34(1), 35(2), 36, 43, 56, 58, 59, 60 and 60(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Cochin Abkari Act; Bombay Lotteries and Prize Competition Control and Tax Act, 1948; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rules 1, 11, 12, 23, 24, 27A, 28, 30, 31, 35, 36, 36 (23-A), 59 and 103(1); Punjab Liquor Licence (First Amendment) Rules, 1968 - Rule 27-A; Prohibition and Excise Laws; Federal law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 47, 132(1), 133(1), 226, 298 and 301; Ajmer Excise Regulation - Regulation 1915; Bombay Abkari Act, 1878; Bengal Excise Act, 1909; Madras Abkari Act, 1886; Eastern Bensal and Assam Excise Act, 1910; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1975SC1121; (1975)1SCC737; [1975]3SCR254; MANU/SC/0321/1975

[1973]1SCR533 , a Constitution Bench of this Court had to consider the question whether Section 43 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 under which the licence of a liquor contractor was withdrawn, violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. … control and restriction being obviously necessary for the preservation of public health and morals, and to raise revenue. 49. In The State of Bombay and Am: v. F. N. Baisara : [1951]2SCR682 , the Constitutional validity of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 15 1955

Sreenath Malakar and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-15-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 260(1); ;Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 46 and 63

Reported in : AIR1955Cal552,1955CriLJ1354,61CWN686

Kumar Dutta appearing on behalf of the petitioner has argued that although a person convicted under Section 40, Bengal Excise Act, 1909, is liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or to fine which may … Full Bench case of -- 'The Empress v. Baidanath Das', 3 Cal 366 (A), that an offence under Section 49, Bengal Abkari Act, XXI of 1856, could he tried summarily, the confiscation provided being merely a consequence of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 1968

N.J. Nayadu and Co. and ors. Vs. Administrator of the City of Nagpur a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-11-1968

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 114, 114(1), 114(2), 114(3), 115 and 144; Nagpur Municipal Corporation Theatre Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245 and 276; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 5; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 229, 548 and 548(2); Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 4, 8 and 9; Sugar Industry (Protection) Act, 1932 - Sections 4; Salt (Additional Import Duty) Act, 1939 - Sections 4; Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 27; Mathches (Excise Duty) Act, 1934 - Sections 3(2) and 4; ;Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act, 1933 - Sections 11(1) and 12; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 73; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 169; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 113(2), 11

Reported in : AIR1970Bom59; (1969)71BOMLR253; ILR1970Bom68; 1969MhLJ234

further and has often left to the executive an unfettered power to fix the rate of tax. The Bengal Excise Act, 1909 (Bengal Act V of 1909). Section 27 empowers the Government to impose an excise duty or a countervailing … guided or controlled, there was a difference of opinion between the two members of the Bench, in paragraph 49 of the report, Bachawat J. observed that the Legislature may formulate its policy with regard to fixation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1959

The Corporation of Calcutta and ors. Vs. Sarat Chandra Ghatak and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-28-1959

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 110(2), 199(2), 245, 265 and 277; ;Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 233 and 229

Reported in : AIR1959Cal704

further and has often left to the executive an unfettered power to fix the rate of tax. The Bengal Excise Act, 1909 (Bengal Act V of 1909), Section 27 empowers the Government to impose an excise duty or a countervailing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1995

Shree Electronics Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-1995

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT407TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2006

Rita Shaw and ors. Vs. Dipendra Lal Shaw and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-03-2006

Subject : Excise

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 14; ;Indian Trusts Act - Section 6; ;Bengal Excise Act - Section 86; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 31 and 42; ;Bengal Excise Act, 1909; ;Income Tax Act - Section 185; ;Bengal Excise Rules - Rules 207, 208 and 209; ;Hindu Law

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN414

is excise license, without which this business cannot be operated, and this again, under the provisions of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and rules thereof, is in the nature of a personal privilege, and not a mere incidence of the … Dwijendra v. Rabindra Nath : AIR1987Cal289 (iii) Chunnu Meah v. Tnanda Mean 49 CWN 799. Addressing the provisions of Section 42 of the Partnership Act, … and marked 'Exhibit 5' runs contrary to law, being hit by the rule against perpetuity, as contained in Section 14 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It is also the case of the plaintiffs that exclusion

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 1994

Khoday Distilleries Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(2), 19(6), 47. 300A, 301 and 304; Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Wholesale Trade, Distribution and Retail Trade in Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor, Wine and Beer) Act, 1993

Reported in : JT1994(6)SC588; 1994(4)SCALE528; (1995)1SCC574; [1994]Supp4SCR477; MANU/SC/0572/1995

then referred to the contention on behalf of the appellant that the provisions of Section 43 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 which empowered the licensing authority to withdraw the licence for any reason whatsoever not falling under Section 42

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1917

The Bank of Upper India Vs. the Administrator-general of Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-20-1917

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 47Ind.Cas.529

of, effect of--Civil Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Order XX, Rule 13(2)--Presidency Towns Insolvency Act (III of 1909), Section 49. - … 2nd September 1915 in connection with the claim of the Administrator-General of Bengal for the refund of a certain sum by the Punjab Government, which … stock and other moveable properties of the distillery at different places were executed under Section 34 of the Excise Act and Section 70 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act. These attachments were issued on the 30th September 1913

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial