Advanced Search Results
Kali Charan Mukherjee Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Sep-01-1913
Criminal
(1914)ILR41Cal537
the Chief Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta with the commission of offences under Sections 46 and 52 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909. He was convicted under both these sections, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three months under Section 46.2.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs to Government of West ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-06-1979
ExciseCriminal
Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 63, 63(2) and 64(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
AIR1979SC1029; 1979CriLJ897; 1979CENCUS505D; 1988(1)SCALE964; (1979)4SCC85; [1979]3SCR472; 1979(11)LC823(SC)
by the Magistrate, First Class, Alipore, District 24-Parganas, in respect of a charge under Section 46(a) of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).3. On the night of July 29, 1963, at about 7.30 p.m., the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJalaluddIn Peshawari Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jul-17-1918
Land Acquisition
47Ind.Cas.813
case to the Magistrate'. The petitioner, it appears, has been convicted and sentenced under Section 46 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909. Clause (a) of Section 83 of the Act lays down that no Magistrate shall take cognizance of an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sreenath Malakar and anr. Vs. the State
Kolkata
Jun-15-1955
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 260(1); ;Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 46 and 63
AIR1955Cal552,1955CriLJ1354,61CWN686
J.P. Mitter, J.1. This is a petition for revision of an order of conviction and sentence under Section 46, Bengal Excise Act (Act V of 1909) for unlawful possession of a quantity of 'charas', an intoxicant. The … Kumar Dutta appearing on behalf of the petitioner has argued that although a person convicted under Section 40, Bengal Excise Act, 1909, is liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or to fine which may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBooth Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Sep-01-1913
Criminal
AIR1914Cal649,(1914)ILR41Cal545
JJ.1. The appellant, C.H. Booth, was charged with the commission of an offence under Section 46 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, inasmuch as he had imported 491 ounces of cocaine without a license or pass. He was tried by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUpendra Nath Biswas Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Dec-11-1913
Criminal
(1914)ILR41Cal694
been convicted by the Fourth Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta, of offences under Sections 46 and 48 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 210 under fee latter section; no separate sentence has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Chandra Sikdar and anr. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Apr-16-1917
Education
40Ind.Cas.740
a liquid substance spoken of as Mrita Sanjivani Sudha and have been sentenced under Section 46(a) of the Bengal Excise Act V of 1909 each to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or in default to undergo six weeks'
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUttam Chand Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jul-12-1911
Criminal
(1912)ILR39Cal344,15Ind.Cas.1007
at Koilwar, in the district of Arrah. His Koilwar servant, Lakhichand, was convicted, under Section 46 of the Bengal Excise Act (V of 1909), for being in possession of 2 1/2 seers of ganja which lie was attempting to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMati Lal Chandra Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
May-01-1912
Criminal
(1912)ILR39Cal1053
is foreign liquor and has paid the full duty imposed thereon by the Indian Tariff Act or the Bengal Excise Act. But this is rather discounted by another letter from the same gentleman to the Collector of Hooghly in … the appellants Mati Lal Chandra and Promotho Lal Chandra of transporting excisable articles from Chandernagore to Calcutta under Section 46, Act V of 1909, and of being in possession of excisable articles knowing the same to have been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCalcutta Country Spirit Opium and Drug Association Ltd. Vs. State of W ...
Kolkata
Apr-11-1974
Sales TaxConstitution
[1974]34STC161(Cal)
the two points as aforesaid raised by the petitioners. Drawing my attention to the different provisions of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, Rules, Regulations and Orders made thereunder, Mr. Bose has contended that a sale effected by a licensed retail … effecting a sale and, on demand by the consumer, he is bound under a threat of penalty under Section 46 of the Bengal Excise Act to effect the sale of the country spirit in a manner, of a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »