Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: banglore development authority act 1976 section 72 · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.052 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 23 1994

Sitaram Vs. Ram Charan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-1994

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 Sections 35 and 79; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 117; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 13, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1995MP134; 1995(0)MPLJ818

injunction was maintainable and was not liable to be dismissed. If any authority is needed, See, Coropration of Banglore City v. M. Papainah, AIR 1989 SC 1809 in which it has also been held that finding arrived … appellant/defendant came with the case that he was in possession prior to 1976 and in the year 1976, the suit land was given to him … Granting the presence of the such facts, a party instituting the proceeding is entitled to its enforcement. Later developments cannot defeat his right. See, also a Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Chandra … Khasra issued by Patwari was admissible under Section 35 of the Evidence Act which was sufficient evidence to prove sub-tenancy and for that, production of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2009

Godawari Marathwada Patbandhare Thorugh the Sub Divisional Officer, Mi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2S, 10(1), 12(5), 15, 17B, 25, 25B, 25B(2), 25F, 25H and 25G; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971; Maharashtra Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Act, 1998 - Sections 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rules 2 and 8

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4191

Ltd. v. Hindustan Veg. Oils Corporation Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2001 AIR SCW 2282, ii) Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Devi Dayal reported in 2002 AIR SCW 1128, iii) M.C.D. v. Praveen Kumar Jain and Ors. reported … Learned Counsel further placed reliance on the reported judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa and Ors. reported in : (1978) 2 SCC 213 to … of State of U.P. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi reported in : AIR 1976 SC 2547, and contented that para 22 is binding on this Court. … of 73 days, from 1.4.1992 to 1.3.1994 is 72 days. The court has further recorded that it … Section 10 r.w. Sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 to the Labour Court.A demand notice was issued on 4.9.1991 alleging

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2010

Pallavi Tiwari D,o. Bhagwan Tiwari and ors Vs. Union of India Thru Min ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-25-2010

Subject : Education

in such matters) as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mysore State Electricity Board v. Banglore Woolen, Cotton & Silk Mills Ltd. & ors, AIR 1963 SC 1128 . 88. Therefore, it is evident … in his/ her graduate/ post-graduate degree or any other qualification equivalent thereto. 6. In view of the above development, the State Government wrote a letter dated 28th April, 2010 to the Chairman NCTE inter alia stating there … Intermediate Examination of any Indian University, any examination conducted by any other authority. (4)Any student whose work or conduct is unsatisfactory may be removed from … result of the Constitution 42nd Amendment Act of 1976. The present Entry 25 in the Concurrent List … and what is good and bad for them. 72. The Court can not sit in judgment over … view of the provisions as provided under National Counsel for Teacher Education Act,1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') read with National Council For Teacher Education … of U.P. in exercise of power under sub Section (5) of Section 28 of U.P. State Universities

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 05 1994

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-05-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2 and 25(F); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1099P& H; (1994)108PLR734

to retrenchment. He relied on decisions of the Supreme Court in Management of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Banglore, (1984-I-LLJ-110); Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. Chandigrah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Chandigarh, (1990 -II-LLJ-70) and … G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Petitioner Kartar Singh was appointed as Glerk in the service of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short 'the HUDA') vide order dated July 13, 1982 (Annexure R-2/1) issued by the Chief Administrator, HUDA. … terminated his service vide letter dated September 26, 1984 (Annexure P-3). This action of the employer became the subject matter of an industrial dispute, which … for the employer to have complied with the two mandatory requirements of Section 25F (a) and (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial