Advanced Search Results
Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...
Karnataka
Sep-02-2011
Land Acquisition
rather difficult to fathom. BDA is a development authority within the meaning of the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 [for short, the Act] in respect of metropolitan area of Bangalore city and also planning authority within the … within Bangalore metropolitan area takes place only in conformity with this plan. 5. Being a Development Authority under the BDA Act, when a scheme is … petition schedule premises; c. To quash the land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Sl.No.140, Sy.No.56/2, situated at Geddalahalli Village, Banglore North Taluk, in No.HUD 39 MNG 78 dated 2.8.1978 as per Annexure ‘G’ to the writ petition; OR … land initiated by the respondents, pursuant to notification dated 3.1.1977 issued under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, 1976 by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-G,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Oct-21-2011
Land Acquisition
Bondu Ramaswamy and Ors. Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors. In the said case acquisition of land by Banglore Development Authority for planned development was under challenge. Land of 16 villages was notified to be acquired near adjoining Banglore … purpose and object of the 1976 Act. It is true that under Section 6(2)(a) of the 1976 Act the functions of the Authority includes acquisition … its statutory power for the object which is not contemplated by the 1976 Act. The GNOIDA has mechanically recommended invocation of urgency clause so that … private builders indicating that on mere payment of 5% of allotment money allotments have been made since … industrial use of some villages was got changed into residential facilitating transfer to private parties indicate that the action of the GNOIDA is not to fulfil the object of the Act, rather it has been exercising its
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmbaji Narsing Mali since deceased through LHs. and Others Vs. State o ...
Mumbai
Sep-23-2014
Land Acquisition
contention that the activity of education was an "industry" relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court in Banglore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and others reported in (1978) 2 SCC 213, Miss A … relied upon the affidavit-in-reply filed by Shri Sham Wardhane, Joint Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya Mumbai and submitted that after the proceedings were remanded by … were directed to hand over possession of said land to the Competent Authority on 3-12-1983. In aforesaid communication, the petitioners were informed that excess land … the order dated 12-7-2006 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). By aforesaid order the allotment of surplus land in favour of … made that the order dated 6-2-1989 be implemented. 5. It appears from the record that on 2-2-1994,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Godawari Marathwada Patbandhare Thorugh the Sub Divisional Officer, Mi ...
Mumbai
Oct-07-2009
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2S, 10(1), 12(5), 15, 17B, 25, 25B, 25B(2), 25F, 25H and 25G; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971; Maharashtra Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Act, 1998 - Sections 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rules 2 and 8
2009(111)BomLR4191
Ltd. v. Hindustan Veg. Oils Corporation Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2001 AIR SCW 2282, ii) Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Devi Dayal reported in 2002 AIR SCW 1128, iii) M.C.D. v. Praveen Kumar Jain and Ors. reported … Learned Counsel further placed reliance on the reported judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa and Ors. reported in : (1978) 2 SCC 213 to … Section 10 r.w. Sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 to the Labour Court.A demand notice was issued on 4.9.1991 alleging … of State of U.P. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi reported in : AIR 1976 SC 2547, and contented that para 22 is binding on this Court.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSitaram Vs. Ram Charan and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-23-1994
PropertyCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 Sections 35 and 79; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 117; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 13, Rule 1
AIR1995MP134; 1995(0)MPLJ818
injunction was maintainable and was not liable to be dismissed. If any authority is needed, See, Coropration of Banglore City v. M. Papainah, AIR 1989 SC 1809 in which it has also been held that finding arrived … appellant/defendant came with the case that he was in possession prior to 1976 and in the year 1976, the suit land was given to him … that the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 to 5 were co-owners (Bhumiswamis) of the land situated in … Granting the presence of the such facts, a party instituting the proceeding is entitled to its enforcement. Later developments cannot defeat his right. See, also a Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Chandra … Khasra issued by Patwari was admissible under Section 35 of the Evidence Act which was sufficient evidence to prove sub-tenancy and for that, production of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBansal Sharevest Services Limited Through Its Director, Vs. Commission ...
Allahabad
Feb-21-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226
(2007)212CTR(All)517; [2008]306ITR162(All)
1506 Safalya Tara Baug, Love lane, Byculla, Mumbai. In addition, he has business at Kolkata, Bhuj, Raj Kot, Banglore, Mathura, New Delhi and Haridwar. The case of Shri Rajendra Prasad Bansal, 1175, Hara Pathak, Manik Chowk, Mathura, … I think, developed to a stage today when, without reiterating any analysis of the steps by which the development has come about, one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds on which administrative action is subject … v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. : [1991]187ITR405(AP) that the authority was under a statutory obligation to specify the reasons and justify transfer … the assessee Status From To--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. AAACB7738B M/s Bansal Sharevest Co. ACIT-IV ACITServices … Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Kanpur under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').2. This is the third petition
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMysore Press (P) Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Mysore Press (P) Ltd.
Karnataka
Mar-05-1997
Labour and Industrial
ILR1997KAR941; 1997(3)KarLJ19
allow the writ appeal and set aside the order of the learned Single Judge. - Section 69, Bangalore Development Authority (Disposal of Commercial sites and Corner Sites) Rules, 1984, Rule 2 & Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) … workman appears to have filed an application asking for provision of the assistance of the representative of the Banglore Newspapers Employees Union. On that day when this point was raised the enquiry officer rendered a ruling holiday … for printing the wrapper of 'Prajamata' to be published on May 23, 1976 and May 30, 1976. Despite instructions given to make the plates in … length the arguments submitted by both the counsel. 5. Reliance was placed on The Dunlop Rubber Co. … deliberately failed to get ready the plates. Therefore on the ground of act of wilful insubordination and disobedience which was construed as misconduct under the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishori Lal and 91 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-28-1980
Motor Vehicles
1980WLN(UC)379
of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. etc.: AIR 1976 SG 1815 (Para 8) K(sic) Cohuthan Proprietor, Bharat Motor Service Banglore and Ors. V. State of Mysore: AIR 1969 Mysore 215 (Head Note (a) (c) paras 4 and 5) … providing of the road transport facilities recognised by the Government or local authority, or by police authority affected by the scheme and this has to … in 'bus road nationalisation' cases is Narayanappa and Ors. v. State of Mysore and Ors. : [1960]3SCR742 Further developments regarding the case law about the scope of judicial review according to Mr. Munshi is land ma ked … of legal battles. The constitutional umbrella of inclusion of the Motor Vehicles Act in 9th Schedule of the Constitution also proved insufficient to provide immunity … via Nagar.5. The draft schemes of above under Section 68 (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19(sic)9
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Kantha Chandra and o ...
Karnataka
Apr-27-1987
Property
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 48, 49, 53, 95, 95(2), 95(3) and 95(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 148 and 148(1)
AIR1989Kant1
the question involved in the case on hand.22.13. In W.P.No.455/71 divided on11-10-1973, (K. Narayana Setty v. Deputy commr. Banglore reported in (1974) 1 Kant LJ(SN)page 25 item No. 87, the question as who can prefer an appeal … enforcement notice had been quashed on the ground that for the alleged development no permission was required. It was held that the 'person aggrieved' was … in J. M. Desai v. Roshan Kumar, AIR 1976 SC 578. In the aforesaid case, the Supreme … of these petitions to convert agricultural lands to nonagricultural purposes are valid in law?6. What order?Point No. 1:9. Sub-section (5) of S. 95 of the Act reads thus:'95. Use of agricultural land and the procedure for use of … granted. There will be no error capable of correction by the Appellate Authority.ii) Granting or refusing of permission for conversion appears a matter between the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPallavi Tiwari D,o. Bhagwan Tiwari and ors Vs. Union of India Thru Min ...
Allahabad
Oct-25-2010
Education
in such matters) as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mysore State Electricity Board v. Banglore Woolen, Cotton & Silk Mills Ltd. & ors, AIR 1963 SC 1128 . 88. Therefore, it is evident … or any other qualification equivalent thereto. 6. In view of the above development, the State Government wrote a letter dated 28th April, 2010 to the … Intermediate Examination of any Indian University, any examination conducted by any other authority. (4)Any student whose work or conduct is unsatisfactory may be removed from … result of the Constitution 42nd Amendment Act of 1976. The present Entry 25 in the Concurrent List … eligible for admission to the programme." 7. Accordingly the State of U.P. in exercise of power under sub Section (5) of Section 28 of U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 read with Section 21 of the U.P. General Clauses
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »