Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: banglore development authority act 1976 section 33 · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.047 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 2011

Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-02-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

rather difficult to fathom. BDA is a development authority within the meaning of the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 [for short, the Act] in respect of metropolitan area of Bangalore city and also planning authority within the … the land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Sl.No.140, Sy.No.56/2, situated at Geddalahalli Village, Banglore North Taluk, in No.HUD 39 MNG 78 dated 2.8.1978 as per Annexure … of now, on the premise that they are encroachers on BDA property and by issue of notices under Section 33 of the Act as against the neighbours of some of the writ petitioners and a further action against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 2011

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-21-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bondu Ramaswamy and Ors. Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors. In the said case acquisition of land by Banglore Development Authority for planned development was under challenge. Land of 16 villages was notified to be acquired near adjoining Banglore … purpose and object of the 1976 Act. It is true that under Section 6(2)(a) of the 1976 Act the functions of the Authority includes acquisition … its statutory power for the object which is not contemplated by the 1976 Act. The GNOIDA has mechanically recommended invocation of urgency clause so that … was repelled by the Apex court in paragraph 33 which is quoted as below : An argument … industrial use of some villages was got changed into residential facilitating transfer to private parties indicate that the action of the GNOIDA is not to fulfil the object of the Act, rather it has been exercising its

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2005

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Through Its Secretary Vs. Bishan Dass Son ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-18-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 9(3), 10, 11, 18, 23, 24 and 25; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC970

learned counsel for the appellant also cited before us a Division Bench ruling of this Court in 'Allahabad Development Authority, Allahabad v. Shakeel Ahmad and Ors.' reported in : 2004(2)AWC986 . In this case 5 Bighas 11 Biswas … are present, it can merit a consideration as a comparable case ( See The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Banglore v. T. Adinarayan Setty), : AIR1959SC429 .'25. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that in the Building Rules … that on 14.6.76 a Notification Under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (the Act) was issued by the State of U.P. for acquisition of … (the Act) was issued by the State of U.P. for acquisition of 33.87 Acres of land situate in village Sirsamau, Pargana, Tahsil and District Etawah

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 28 1980

Kishori Lal and 91 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-28-1980

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)379

of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. etc.: AIR 1976 SG 1815 (Para 8) K(sic) Cohuthan Proprietor, Bharat Motor Service Banglore and Ors. V. State of Mysore: AIR 1969 Mysore 215 (Head Note (a) (c) paras 4 and 5) … providing of the road transport facilities recognised by the Government or local authority, or by police authority affected by the scheme and this has to … in 'bus road nationalisation' cases is Narayanappa and Ors. v. State of Mysore and Ors. : [1960]3SCR742 Further developments regarding the case law about the scope of judicial review according to Mr. Munshi is land ma ked … of legal battles. The constitutional umbrella of inclusion of the Motor Vehicles Act in 9th Schedule of the Constitution also proved insufficient to provide immunity … via Nagar.5. The draft schemes of above under Section 68 (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19(sic)9 … v. Mahabir Lal and Ors. AIR 1964 S.C. 337, in which it was held as under:Where a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial