Advanced Search Results

Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rather difficult to fathom. BDA is a development authority within the meaning of the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 [for short, the Act] in respect of metropolitan area of Bangalore city and also planning authority within the … petition schedule premises; c. To quash the land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Sl.No.140, Sy.No.56/2, situated at Geddalahalli Village, Banglore North Taluk, in No.HUD 39 MNG 78 dated 2.8.1978 as per Annexure ‘G’ to the writ petition; OR … land initiated by the respondents, pursuant to notification dated 3.1.1977 issued under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, 1976 by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-G, … periodic orders that had come to be passed by this Court on 30.11.2010, 1.12.2010, 8.12.2010, 16.12.2010 in W.P.Nos.16074 to 16100/2010 as also the developments that

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bondu Ramaswamy and Ors. Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors. In the said case acquisition of land by Banglore Development Authority for planned development was under challenge. Land of 16 villages was notified to be acquired near adjoining Banglore … purpose and object of the 1976 Act. It is true that under Section 6(2)(a) of the 1976 Act the functions of the Authority includes acquisition … its statutory power for the object which is not contemplated by the 1976 Act. The GNOIDA has mechanically recommended invocation of urgency clause so that … industrial use of some villages was got changed into residential facilitating transfer to private parties indicate that the action of the GNOIDA is not to fulfil the object of the Act, rather it has been exercising its … the proposal issued declaration under Section 6(1)/17(1) on 30.06.2008. After the declaration under Section 6(1)/17(1), notices under

Ambaji Narsing Mali since deceased through LHs. and Others Vs. State o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention that the activity of education was an "industry" relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court in Banglore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and others reported in (1978) 2 SCC 213, Miss A … relied upon the affidavit-in-reply filed by Shri Sham Wardhane, Joint Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya Mumbai and submitted that after the proceedings were remanded by … were directed to hand over possession of said land to the Competent Authority on 3-12-1983. In aforesaid communication, the petitioners were informed that excess land … the order dated 12-7-2006 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). By aforesaid order the allotment of surplus land in favour of … petitioners were the owners of aforesaid lands. On 30-11-1982, a notification under Section 10(1) of the said

Mysore Press (P) Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Mysore Press (P) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : ILR1997KAR941; 1997(3)KarLJ19

allow the writ appeal and set aside the order of the learned Single Judge. - Section 69, Bangalore Development Authority (Disposal of Commercial sites and Corner Sites) Rules, 1984, Rule 2 & Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) … for printing the wrapper of 'Prajamata' to be published on May 23, 1976 and May 30, 1976. Despite instructions given to make the plates in … workman appears to have filed an application asking for provision of the assistance of the representative of the Banglore Newspapers Employees Union. On that day when this point was raised the enquiry officer rendered a ruling holiday … deliberately failed to get ready the plates. Therefore on the ground of act of wilful insubordination and disobedience which was construed as misconduct under the

Kishori Lal and 91 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)379

of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. etc.: AIR 1976 SG 1815 (Para 8) K(sic) Cohuthan Proprietor, Bharat Motor Service Banglore and Ors. V. State of Mysore: AIR 1969 Mysore 215 (Head Note (a) (c) paras 4 and 5) … providing of the road transport facilities recognised by the Government or local authority, or by police authority affected by the scheme and this has to … in 'bus road nationalisation' cases is Narayanappa and Ors. v. State of Mysore and Ors. : [1960]3SCR742 Further developments regarding the case law about the scope of judicial review according to Mr. Munshi is land ma ked … of legal battles. The constitutional umbrella of inclusion of the Motor Vehicles Act in 9th Schedule of the Constitution also proved insufficient to provide immunity … via Nagar.5. The draft schemes of above under Section 68 (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19(sic)9 … the Joint Legal Remembrancer II approved it, on 30th March, 1978 and the same was notified as

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Through Its Secretary Vs. Bishan Dass Son ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 9(3), 10, 11, 18, 23, 24 and 25; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC970

learned counsel for the appellant also cited before us a Division Bench ruling of this Court in 'Allahabad Development Authority, Allahabad v. Shakeel Ahmad and Ors.' reported in : 2004(2)AWC986 . In this case 5 Bighas 11 Biswas … are present, it can merit a consideration as a comparable case ( See The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Banglore v. T. Adinarayan Setty), : AIR1959SC429 .'25. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that in the Building Rules … that on 14.6.76 a Notification Under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (the Act) was issued by the State of U.P. for acquisition of … 24.1.1985 and the S.L.A.O. after hearing the parties gave his award on 30:5.1985. The S.L.A.O. relied upon sale deeds No. 173 and 174 which had

S.T. Ramesh Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19; All India Services (Confidential Rolls) Rules, 1970 - Rules 5, 5(3), 6, 8 and 9

Reported in : AIR2007SC1262; JT2007(3)SC532; 2007(3)SCALE354; (2007)9SCC436; ILR2007(2)Kar1429; 2007(2)KLJ635; 2007(3)KCCRSN185

28.2.2001 - Mr. C. Dinakar, IPS (Retd.), (2nd respondent), Director General & Inspector General of Police, Karnataka State, Banglore, in paragraph 20 made general assessment as follows:An arrogant and undisciplined officer against whom the Central Administrative Tribunal … relations with subordinates, colleagues and general public are very cordial. He has evinced an extraordinary interest in the development of subordinates and used training as a tool for the purpose, having implemented computer based training at the … appreciate the environment and the work culture as defined by the Competent Authority in the COD and this block flow of new ideas or new … to the Indian Police Service in the year 1976 and allocated to Karnataka State by the Central … factually incorrect, the respondents have also submitted that they have taken appropriate action in dealing with the representation submitted by the Appellant as per the … No. 981 of 1999 before the Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (for … dismissed the Original application with costs of Rs. 3000/- payable to the second respondent, namely, Sri C.