Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: banglore development authority act 1976 section 3 · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 2011

Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-02-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

rather difficult to fathom. BDA is a development authority within the meaning of the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 [for short, the Act] in respect of metropolitan area of Bangalore city and also planning authority within the … petition schedule premises; c. To quash the land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Sl.No.140, Sy.No.56/2, situated at Geddalahalli Village, Banglore North Taluk, in No.HUD 39 MNG 78 dated 2.8.1978 as per Annexure ‘G’ to the writ petition; OR … land initiated by the respondents, pursuant to notification dated 3.1.1977 issued under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, 1976 by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-G,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2014

Ambaji Narsing Mali since deceased through LHs. and Others Vs. State o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention that the activity of education was an "industry" relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court in Banglore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and others reported in (1978) 2 SCC 213, Miss A … relied upon the affidavit-in-reply filed by Shri Sham Wardhane, Joint Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya Mumbai and submitted that after the proceedings were remanded by … were directed to hand over possession of said land to the Competent Authority on 3-12-1983. In aforesaid communication, the petitioners were informed that excess land … the order dated 12-7-2006 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). By aforesaid order the allotment of surplus land in favour of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2009

Godawari Marathwada Patbandhare Thorugh the Sub Divisional Officer, Mi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2S, 10(1), 12(5), 15, 17B, 25, 25B, 25B(2), 25F, 25H and 25G; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971; Maharashtra Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Act, 1998 - Sections 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rules 2 and 8

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4191

Ltd. v. Hindustan Veg. Oils Corporation Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2001 AIR SCW 2282, ii) Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Devi Dayal reported in 2002 AIR SCW 1128, iii) M.C.D. v. Praveen Kumar Jain and Ors. reported … Learned Counsel further placed reliance on the reported judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa and Ors. reported in : (1978) 2 SCC 213 to … of State of U.P. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi reported in : AIR 1976 SC 2547, and contented that para 22 is binding on this Court. … Section 10 r.w. Sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 to the Labour Court.A demand notice was issued on 4.9.1991 alleging … Tommy and Anr. Reported in 2009 (2) Mh.L.J. 358iii) General Secretary, Van Shramik Sangh, Sangli v. Director

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 27 1987

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Kantha Chandra and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-27-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 48, 49, 53, 95, 95(2), 95(3) and 95(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 148 and 148(1)

Reported in : AIR1989Kant1

the question involved in the case on hand.22.13. In W.P.No.455/71 divided on11-10-1973, (K. Narayana Setty v. Deputy commr. Banglore reported in (1974) 1 Kant LJ(SN)page 25 item No. 87, the question as who can prefer an appeal … enforcement notice had been quashed on the ground that for the alleged development no permission was required. It was held that the 'person aggrieved' was … in J. M. Desai v. Roshan Kumar, AIR 1976 SC 578. In the aforesaid case, the Supreme … no land hitherto used for purposes of agriculture only shall be set apart for building sites except Government. Sub-section (3) further provides that the land already set apart for building sites within the limits of any village, town … granted. There will be no error capable of correction by the Appellate Authority.ii) Granting or refusing of permission for conversion appears a matter between the … of S. 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 964 (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964) (hereinafter referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 2011

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-21-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bondu Ramaswamy and Ors. Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors. In the said case acquisition of land by Banglore Development Authority for planned development was under challenge. Land of 16 villages was notified to be acquired near adjoining Banglore … the master plan was reserved as, 'institutional'. The land was part of notification of the industrial area under Section 3 of U.P. Act No.6 of 1976. The development of the area was proposed for allotment to various industries

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1994

Sitaram Vs. Ram Charan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-1994

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 Sections 35 and 79; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 117; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 13, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1995MP134; 1995(0)MPLJ818

injunction was maintainable and was not liable to be dismissed. If any authority is needed, See, Coropration of Banglore City v. M. Papainah, AIR 1989 SC 1809 in which it has also been held that finding arrived … appellant/defendant came with the case that he was in possession prior to 1976 and in the year 1976, the suit land was given to him … Granting the presence of the such facts, a party instituting the proceeding is entitled to its enforcement. Later developments cannot defeat his right. See, also a Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Chandra … Khasra issued by Patwari was admissible under Section 35 of the Evidence Act which was sufficient evidence to prove sub-tenancy and for that, production of … in Case No. 17/71 -72-27, vide order dated 3-9-1973 (Ex. P/1), ordered partition of the land between

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1997

Mysore Press (P) Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Mysore Press (P) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-05-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : ILR1997KAR941; 1997(3)KarLJ19

allow the writ appeal and set aside the order of the learned Single Judge. - Section 69, Bangalore Development Authority (Disposal of Commercial sites and Corner Sites) Rules, 1984, Rule 2 & Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) … workman appears to have filed an application asking for provision of the assistance of the representative of the Banglore Newspapers Employees Union. On that day when this point was raised the enquiry officer rendered a ruling holiday … for printing the wrapper of 'Prajamata' to be published on May 23, 1976 and May 30, 1976. Despite instructions given to make the plates in … be published on May 23, 1976 and May 30, 1976. Despite instructions given to make the plates … deliberately failed to get ready the plates. Therefore on the ground of act of wilful insubordination and disobedience which was construed as misconduct under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2006

Bansal Sharevest Services Limited Through Its Director, Vs. Commission ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-21-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : (2007)212CTR(All)517; [2008]306ITR162(All)

1506 Safalya Tara Baug, Love lane, Byculla, Mumbai. In addition, he has business at Kolkata, Bhuj, Raj Kot, Banglore, Mathura, New Delhi and Haridwar. The case of Shri Rajendra Prasad Bansal, 1175, Hara Pathak, Manik Chowk, Mathura, … I think, developed to a stage today when, without reiterating any analysis of the steps by which the development has come about, one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds on which administrative action is subject … v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. : [1991]187ITR405(AP) that the authority was under a statutory obligation to specify the reasons and justify transfer … pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid directions issued by this … Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Kanpur under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').2. This is the third petition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2007

Abdul Salam Alias Babu S/O Ajeemdar Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretar ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-01-2007

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC399

Collector and Ors. : AIR2005SC3581 ; and State of Kerala v. V.P. Kurian (2005) 11 SCC 493.14. In Banglore Development Authority v. R. Hanumaiah and Ors. (2005) 12 SC 508, the Hon'ble Supreme Court placing reliance upon its earlier … has been filed for quashing the impugned Notification dated 15.06.2006, issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called the Act) and Declaration dated 19.10.2006, issued under Section 6 of the Act, and further … awarded when not completed. (1) Except in case provided for in Section 36, the Government shall be at liberty to withdraw from the acquisition of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1980

Kishori Lal and 91 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-28-1980

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)379

of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. etc.: AIR 1976 SG 1815 (Para 8) K(sic) Cohuthan Proprietor, Bharat Motor Service Banglore and Ors. V. State of Mysore: AIR 1969 Mysore 215 (Head Note (a) (c) paras 4 and 5) … providing of the road transport facilities recognised by the Government or local authority, or by police authority affected by the scheme and this has to … of which is not yet in sight after 3 decides of legal battles. The constitutional umbrella of … in 'bus road nationalisation' cases is Narayanappa and Ors. v. State of Mysore and Ors. : [1960]3SCR742 Further developments regarding the case law about the scope of judicial review according to Mr. Munshi is land ma ked … of legal battles. The constitutional umbrella of inclusion of the Motor Vehicles Act in 9th Schedule of the Constitution also proved insufficient to provide immunity … via Nagar.5. The draft schemes of above under Section 68 (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19(sic)9

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial