Advanced Search Results

Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rather difficult to fathom. BDA is a development authority within the meaning of the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 [for short, the Act] in respect of metropolitan area of Bangalore city and also planning authority within the … petition schedule premises; c. To quash the land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Sl.No.140, Sy.No.56/2, situated at Geddalahalli Village, Banglore North Taluk, in No.HUD 39 MNG 78 dated 2.8.1978 as per Annexure ‘G’ to the writ petition; OR … land initiated by the respondents, pursuant to notification dated 3.1.1977 issued under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, 1976 by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-G, … quashing the impugned Letter of Allotment bearing No. (LANGUAGE) and 56/2/GH/33/2010-11 dated 29.10.2010 issued by the 1st respondent in favour of the 4th respondent (Annexure-S);

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bondu Ramaswamy and Ors. Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors. In the said case acquisition of land by Banglore Development Authority for planned development was under challenge. Land of 16 villages was notified to be acquired near adjoining Banglore … purpose and object of the 1976 Act. It is true that under Section 6(2)(a) of the 1976 Act the functions of the Authority includes acquisition … its statutory power for the object which is not contemplated by the 1976 Act. The GNOIDA has mechanically recommended invocation of urgency clause so that … of U.P. and others reported in 2008(5) ALJ 29. In the said case land was acquired for … industrial use of some villages was got changed into residential facilitating transfer to private parties indicate that the action of the GNOIDA is not to fulfil the object of the Act, rather it has been exercising its

Mr.Vijay.C Kapoor vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

of the Land Acquisition Act.5. He extensively referred to the judgment of Apex Courtin the case of Indore Development Authority Vs Manoharlal and others reported in (2020) 8 SCC 129 with regard to the applicability of sub-section (2) … 008.7. MR. VIKRAM KAPOOR S/O LATE HARNAMDAS KAPOOR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.1, UNION STREET, CIVIL STATION BANGLORE - 560 001. REPRESENTED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES7(a) MS. HARISHINI KAPOOR D/O OF LATE MR. VIKRAM KAPOOR RESIDING … Land Acquisition Act wherein the date of taking possession is shown as 29.10.2011, learned counsel insists that the said date falls within the window period

Kishori Lal and 91 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)379

of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. etc.: AIR 1976 SG 1815 (Para 8) K(sic) Cohuthan Proprietor, Bharat Motor Service Banglore and Ors. V. State of Mysore: AIR 1969 Mysore 215 (Head Note (a) (c) paras 4 and 5) … providing of the road transport facilities recognised by the Government or local authority, or by police authority affected by the scheme and this has to … in 'bus road nationalisation' cases is Narayanappa and Ors. v. State of Mysore and Ors. : [1960]3SCR742 Further developments regarding the case law about the scope of judicial review according to Mr. Munshi is land ma ked … of legal battles. The constitutional umbrella of inclusion of the Motor Vehicles Act in 9th Schedule of the Constitution also proved insufficient to provide immunity … via Nagar.5. The draft schemes of above under Section 68 (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19(sic)9

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Through Its Secretary Vs. Bishan Dass Son ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 9(3), 10, 11, 18, 23, 24 and 25; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC970

learned counsel for the appellant also cited before us a Division Bench ruling of this Court in 'Allahabad Development Authority, Allahabad v. Shakeel Ahmad and Ors.' reported in : 2004(2)AWC986 . In this case 5 Bighas 11 Biswas … are present, it can merit a consideration as a comparable case ( See The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Banglore v. T. Adinarayan Setty), : AIR1959SC429 .'25. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that in the Building Rules … that on 14.6.76 a Notification Under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (the Act) was issued by the State of U.P. for acquisition of … of 9% on the enhanced amount would be admissible from 30.11.1985 to 29.11.1986 and at the rate of 15% from 30.11.1986 up to to the

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2 and 25(F); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1099P& H; (1994)108PLR734

to retrenchment. He relied on decisions of the Supreme Court in Management of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Banglore, (1984-I-LLJ-110); Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. Chandigrah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Chandigarh, (1990 -II-LLJ-70) and … G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Petitioner Kartar Singh was appointed as Glerk in the service of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short 'the HUDA') vide order dated July 13, 1982 (Annexure R-2/1) issued by the Chief Administrator, HUDA. … to improve. Once again, vide letter dated May 29, 1984 (Annexure R-2/4), adverse remarks in the annual … terminated his service vide letter dated September 26, 1984 (Annexure P-3). This action of the employer became the subject matter of an industrial dispute, which … for the employer to have complied with the two mandatory requirements of Section 25F (a) and (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short