Advanced Search Results

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bondu Ramaswamy and Ors. Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors. In the said case acquisition of land by Banglore Development Authority for planned development was under challenge. Land of 16 villages was notified to be acquired near adjoining Banglore … purpose and object of the 1976 Act. It is true that under Section 6(2)(a) of the 1976 Act the functions of the Authority includes acquisition … its statutory power for the object which is not contemplated by the 1976 Act. The GNOIDA has mechanically recommended invocation of urgency clause so that … industrial use of some villages was got changed into residential facilitating transfer to private parties indicate that the action of the GNOIDA is not to fulfil the object of the Act, rather it has been exercising its … Unioin of India and Ors., (1999) 6 SCC 237. The submission of Shri S.P. Gupta, learned Senior

Ambaji Narsing Mali since deceased through LHs. and Others Vs. State o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

was an "industry" relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court in Banglore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and others reported in … relied upon the affidavit-in-reply filed by Shri Sham Wardhane, Joint Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya Mumbai and submitted that after the proceedings were remanded by … over possession of said land to the Competent Authority on 3-12-1983. In aforesaid communication, the petitioners were … the order dated 12-7-2006 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). By aforesaid order the allotment of surplus land in favour of … that the allotment of surplus land in favour of the respondent No.6 was contrary to the provisions of Section 23 of the said Act inasmuch as the activity of education undertaken by the said Trust was not an

Godawari Marathwada Patbandhare Thorugh the Sub Divisional Officer, Mi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2S, 10(1), 12(5), 15, 17B, 25, 25B, 25B(2), 25F, 25H and 25G; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971; Maharashtra Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Act, 1998 - Sections 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rules 2 and 8

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4191

Ltd. v. Hindustan Veg. Oils Corporation Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2001 AIR SCW 2282, ii) Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Devi Dayal reported in 2002 AIR SCW 1128, iii) M.C.D. v. Praveen Kumar Jain and Ors. reported … the Maharashtra Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Act No. 23 of 1998 and has came into existence w.e.f. … Learned Counsel further placed reliance on the reported judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa and Ors. reported in : (1978) 2 SCC 213 to … of State of U.P. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi reported in : AIR 1976 SC 2547, and contented that para 22 is binding on this Court. … Section 10 r.w. Sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 to the Labour Court.A demand notice was issued on 4.9.1991 alleging

Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rather difficult to fathom. BDA is a development authority within the meaning of the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 [for short, the Act] in respect of metropolitan area of Bangalore city and also planning authority within the … the land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Sl.No.140, Sy.No.56/2, situated at Geddalahalli Village, Banglore North Taluk, in No.HUD 39 MNG 78 dated 2.8.1978 as per Annexure … on which these petitioners claim right, title and interest to the subject land being voided in terms of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872; that recognizing or encouraging such purchasers even while subject lands are already

Mysore Press (P) Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Mysore Press (P) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : ILR1997KAR941; 1997(3)KarLJ19

allow the writ appeal and set aside the order of the learned Single Judge. - Section 69, Bangalore Development Authority (Disposal of Commercial sites and Corner Sites) Rules, 1984, Rule 2 & Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) … for printing the wrapper of 'Prajamata' to be published on May 23, 1976 and May 30, 1976. Despite instructions given to make the plates in … workman appears to have filed an application asking for provision of the assistance of the representative of the Banglore Newspapers Employees Union. On that day when this point was raised the enquiry officer rendered a ruling holiday … deliberately failed to get ready the plates. Therefore on the ground of act of wilful insubordination and disobedience which was construed as misconduct under the

Bansal Sharevest Services Limited Through Its Director, Vs. Commission ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : (2007)212CTR(All)517; [2008]306ITR162(All)

1506 Safalya Tara Baug, Love lane, Byculla, Mumbai. In addition, he has business at Kolkata, Bhuj, Raj Kot, Banglore, Mathura, New Delhi and Haridwar. The case of Shri Rajendra Prasad Bansal, 1175, Hara Pathak, Manik Chowk, Mathura, … I think, developed to a stage today when, without reiterating any analysis of the steps by which the development has come about, one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds on which administrative action is subject … v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. : [1991]187ITR405(AP) that the authority was under a statutory obligation to specify the reasons and justify transfer … Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Kanpur under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').2. This is the third petition

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Kantha Chandra and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 48, 49, 53, 95, 95(2), 95(3) and 95(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 148 and 148(1)

Reported in : AIR1989Kant1

case of Local Planning Authority whose enforcement notice had been quashed on the ground that for the alleged development no permission was required. It was held that the 'person aggrieved' was not one who felt annoyed because … the question involved in the case on hand.22.13. In W.P.No.455/71 divided on11-10-1973, (K. Narayana Setty v. Deputy commr. Banglore reported in (1974) 1 Kant LJ(SN)page 25 item No. 87, the question as who can prefer an appeal … of the Supreme Court in J. M. Desai v. Roshan Kumar, AIR 1976 SC 578. In the aforesaid case, the Supreme Court while dealing with … 'any person' occurring in sub-sec. (5) of S. 23 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1947 … contained in sub-sec. (5) of S. 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 964 (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964) (hereinafter referred to as the Act') … 1979 to convert them for non-agricultural purposes under Section 95 of the Act. In the first instance,

Pallavi Tiwari D,o. Bhagwan Tiwari and ors Vs. Union of India Thru Min ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

in such matters) as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mysore State Electricity Board v. Banglore Woolen, Cotton & Silk Mills Ltd. & ors, AIR 1963 SC 1128 . 88. Therefore, it is evident … in his/ her graduate/ post-graduate degree or any other qualification equivalent thereto. 6. In view of the above development, the State Government wrote a letter dated 28th April, 2010 to the Chairman NCTE inter alia stating there … Intermediate Examination of any Indian University, any examination conducted by any other authority. (4)Any student whose work or conduct is unsatisfactory may be removed from … result of the Constitution 42nd Amendment Act of 1976. The present Entry 25 in the Concurrent List … a University under Section 3 of that Act." 23. Chapter II of the Act deals with the … view of the provisions as provided under National Counsel for Teacher Education Act,1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') read with National Council For Teacher Education … of U.P. in exercise of power under sub Section (5) of Section 28 of U.P. State Universities

Kishori Lal and 91 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)379

of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. etc.: AIR 1976 SG 1815 (Para 8) K(sic) Cohuthan Proprietor, Bharat Motor Service Banglore and Ors. V. State of Mysore: AIR 1969 Mysore 215 (Head Note (a) (c) paras 4 and 5) … providing of the road transport facilities recognised by the Government or local authority, or by police authority affected by the scheme and this has to … in 'bus road nationalisation' cases is Narayanappa and Ors. v. State of Mysore and Ors. : [1960]3SCR742 Further developments regarding the case law about the scope of judicial review according to Mr. Munshi is land ma ked … of legal battles. The constitutional umbrella of inclusion of the Motor Vehicles Act in 9th Schedule of the Constitution also proved insufficient to provide immunity … via Nagar.5. The draft schemes of above under Section 68 (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19(sic)9

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Through Its Secretary Vs. Bishan Dass Son ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 9(3), 10, 11, 18, 23, 24 and 25; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC970

learned counsel for the appellant also cited before us a Division Bench ruling of this Court in 'Allahabad Development Authority, Allahabad v. Shakeel Ahmad and Ors.' reported in : 2004(2)AWC986 . In this case 5 Bighas 11 Biswas … consideration as a comparable case ( See The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Banglore v. T. Adinarayan Setty), : AIR1959SC429 .'25. The Hon'ble Apex Court further … a particular purchaser, though not his compulsion may always be taken into consideration for what it is worth. Section 23 of the Act enumerates the matters to be considered in determining compensation. The first criteria to be taken