Advanced Search Results

Siddalingappa Vs. Bangalore Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 38A, Banglore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : ILR1986KAR3023

site for which it is reserved and such an allotment is opposed to the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act')and the Bangalore City Improvement (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972 (hereinafter referred to … ''amenity' is an inclusive one and it is not exhaustive ; therefore, irrespective of what is stated in Section 2(b) of the Act, any convenience to the public will be an amenity within the meaning of the Act

Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rather difficult to fathom. BDA is a development authority within the meaning of the provisions of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 [for short, the Act] in respect of metropolitan area of Bangalore city and also planning authority within the … petition schedule premises; c. To quash the land acquisition proceedings pertaining to Sl.No.140, Sy.No.56/2, situated at Geddalahalli Village, Banglore North Taluk, in No.HUD 39 MNG 78 dated 2.8.1978 as per Annexure ‘G’ to the writ petition; OR … land initiated by the respondents, pursuant to notification dated 3.1.1977 issued under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, 1976 by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-G,

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bondu Ramaswamy and Ors. Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors. In the said case acquisition of land by Banglore Development Authority for planned development was under challenge. Land of 16 villages was notified to be acquired near adjoining Banglore … its statutory power for the object which is not contemplated by the 1976 Act. The GNOIDA has mechanically recommended invocation of urgency clause so that … Act, when the appropriate Government is satisfied, after considering the report , if any, made under Section 5-A, sub-section (2), that any particular land is needed for a public purpose, or for a Company, a declaration shall be

Ambaji Narsing Mali since deceased through LHs. and Others Vs. State o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention that the activity of education was an "industry" relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court in Banglore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and others reported in (1978) 2 SCC 213, Miss A … relied upon the affidavit-in-reply filed by Shri Sham Wardhane, Joint Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya Mumbai and submitted that after the proceedings were remanded by … were directed to hand over possession of said land to the Competent Authority on 3-12-1983. In aforesaid communication, the petitioners were informed that excess land … the order dated 12-7-2006 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). By aforesaid order the allotment of surplus land in favour of

Godawari Marathwada Patbandhare Thorugh the Sub Divisional Officer, Mi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2S, 10(1), 12(5), 15, 17B, 25, 25B, 25B(2), 25F, 25H and 25G; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971; Maharashtra Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Act, 1998 - Sections 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rules 2 and 8

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4191

Learned Counsel further placed reliance on the reported judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa and Ors. reported in : (1978) 2 SCC 213 to … Ltd. v. Hindustan Veg. Oils Corporation Ltd. and Ors. reported in 2001 AIR SCW 2282, ii) Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Devi Dayal reported in 2002 AIR SCW 1128, iii) M.C.D. v. Praveen Kumar Jain and Ors. reported … of State of U.P. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi reported in : AIR 1976 SC 2547, and contented that para 22 is binding on this Court. … Section 10 r.w. Sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 to the Labour Court.A demand notice was issued on 4.9.1991 alleging

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2 and 25(F); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1099P& H; (1994)108PLR734

to retrenchment. He relied on decisions of the Supreme Court in Management of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Banglore, (1984-I-LLJ-110); Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. Chandigrah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Chandigarh, (1990 -II-LLJ-70) and … G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Petitioner Kartar Singh was appointed as Glerk in the service of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short 'the HUDA') vide order dated July 13, 1982 (Annexure R-2/1) issued by the Chief Administrator, HUDA. … terminated his service vide letter dated September 26, 1984 (Annexure P-3). This action of the employer became the subject matter of an industrial dispute, which … for the employer to have complied with the two mandatory requirements of Section 25F (a) and (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short

Sitaram Vs. Ram Charan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 Sections 35 and 79; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 117; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 13, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1995MP134; 1995(0)MPLJ818

injunction was maintainable and was not liable to be dismissed. If any authority is needed, See, Coropration of Banglore City v. M. Papainah, AIR 1989 SC 1809 in which it has also been held that finding arrived … appellant/defendant came with the case that he was in possession prior to 1976 and in the year 1976, the suit land was given to him … consisted in Survey Nos. 46/2 and 47/1, admeasuring 2 Bighas and 4 Biswas and 1 Bigha and … Granting the presence of the such facts, a party instituting the proceeding is entitled to its enforcement. Later developments cannot defeat his right. See, also a Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Chandra … Khasra issued by Patwari was admissible under Section 35 of the Evidence Act which was sufficient evidence to prove sub-tenancy and for that, production of

Bansal Sharevest Services Limited Through Its Director, Vs. Commission ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : (2007)212CTR(All)517; [2008]306ITR162(All)

1506 Safalya Tara Baug, Love lane, Byculla, Mumbai. In addition, he has business at Kolkata, Bhuj, Raj Kot, Banglore, Mathura, New Delhi and Haridwar. The case of Shri Rajendra Prasad Bansal, 1175, Hara Pathak, Manik Chowk, Mathura, … I think, developed to a stage today when, without reiterating any analysis of the steps by which the development has come about, one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds on which administrative action is subject … v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. : [1991]187ITR405(AP) that the authority was under a statutory obligation to specify the reasons and justify transfer … Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Kanpur under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').2. This is the third petition

Mysore Press (P) Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Mysore Press (P) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : ILR1997KAR941; 1997(3)KarLJ19

allow the writ appeal and set aside the order of the learned Single Judge. - Section 69, Bangalore Development Authority (Disposal of Commercial sites and Corner Sites) Rules, 1984, Rule 2 & Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) … workman appears to have filed an application asking for provision of the assistance of the representative of the Banglore Newspapers Employees Union. On that day when this point was raised the enquiry officer rendered a ruling holiday … for printing the wrapper of 'Prajamata' to be published on May 23, 1976 and May 30, 1976. Despite instructions given to make the plates in … deliberately failed to get ready the plates. Therefore on the ground of act of wilful insubordination and disobedience which was construed as misconduct under the

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Kantha Chandra and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 48, 49, 53, 95, 95(2), 95(3) and 95(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 148 and 148(1)

Reported in : AIR1989Kant1

case of Local Planning Authority whose enforcement notice had been quashed on the ground that for the alleged development no permission was required. It was held that the 'person aggrieved' was not one who felt annoyed because … the question involved in the case on hand.22.13. In W.P.No.455/71 divided on11-10-1973, (K. Narayana Setty v. Deputy commr. Banglore reported in (1974) 1 Kant LJ(SN)page 25 item No. 87, the question as who can prefer an appeal … of the Supreme Court in J. M. Desai v. Roshan Kumar, AIR 1976 SC 578. In the aforesaid case, the Supreme Court while dealing with … contained in sub-sec. (5) of S. 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 964 (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964) (hereinafter referred to as the Act') … 1979 to convert them for non-agricultural purposes under Section 95 of the Act. In the first instance, … ORDER1. In all these petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner is