Advanced Search Results

Indian Industrial Mineral Producers Welfare Association Vs. Government ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4 and 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(3) and 66A; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Atomic Energy (Working of the Mines, Minerals and Handling of the Prescribed Substances) Rules, 1984 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD471; 2005(3)ALT61

Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short 'MMRD Act') and the Rules made thereunder, apart from the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the Rules framed thereunder.2. It is stated that India has large reserves of beach sand minerals in … State Board. The School Tribunal constituted under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Act cannot entertain appeals filed under Section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established and administered by the Cantonment Board. Teacher employed in

Electronics Corporation of India Limited Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

to inspection of the writ petitioner-factory is covered in terms and in accordance with Section 23 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and hence the respondents -State and its officials in its Factories department have no right of inspection. Before … to appoint such persons possessing the prescribed qualifications to be inspectors for the purposes of the said Act. Section 9 detailed the powers exercisable by such Inspectors. Chapter III of the Act dealt with various aspects relating to

Dr. Buddhi Kota Subbarao Vs. K.Parasaran and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18, 19 and 26(2); Indian Penel Code, 1860 - Sections 120B, 193, 195 and 196

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)133; AIR1996SC2687; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)134; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)271; 1996CriLJ3983; 1996(3)Crimes143(SC); JT1996(7)SC265; 1996(5)SCALE797; (1996)5SCC530; [1996]Supp4SCR5

the then Attorney General of India, Mr. K. Parasaran (respondent No. 1 herein) under Section 26(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and authorisation from the Chief Vigilance Officer of the Department of Atomic Energy Mr. S.K. Bhandarkar (respondent No. … the order for framing of charges, the applicant unsuccessfully approached the Bombay High Court through revision application No. 96/89. The applicant thereafter file a criminal writ petition in the High Court once again inter alia calling in

The Central Intelligence Officer Vs. the Commissioner of Inquiry (Mara ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 5(2) to 5(5), 6, 8, 8B, 8C and 12; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 40(2); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18; Kerala Commission of Inquiry Rules, 1958 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15 and 16; Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 - Order 11, Rule 1 - Order 16, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 77(3), 372 and 395; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 102, 103 and 482

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2944; 2005(2)KLT927

the Rules framed under the above said Act. He also invited our attention to Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.32. Now we shall consider how far the privilege claimed by the State as well as the Central Intelligence … of the C.P.Code.31. The learned Additional Solicitor General has argued that in view of the provisions of Rule 9 of the Rules of Business made under Section 40(2) of the Government of India Act, 1935 the Director

Salitho Ores Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. the CaptaIn of Ports CaptaIn of P ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

for use in alumina and metallurgical industries, copper, lead, zinc, tin, nickel, gold, silver and minerals specified under Atomic Energy Act), the State-wise sale prices for different minerals as published by Indian Bureau of Mines shall be the sale … there being a non obstante clause. Reliance has been placed on Section 269 of UD of Income Tax Act, 1962 and the judgment of the Apex Court in 1986 4 SCC page 447 (paras 57, 68). He then … 10/12/2009 which had been issued by Respondents on the ground that it is contrary to the proviso to section 9(3) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as “MMDR Act”). 2. Petitioners

M.R. Govindan and Another Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

sensitive in the context of the national security and also the security of humanity like uranium - the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 only provides under Section 5 for prohibition or regulation of mining activity in such mineral. Under Section 10 … 1959, but however, the said amendment was not given effect to. Subsequently, by GO.Ms.No.1273, Industries (H-1) Department, dated 9.12.1988, all the rules in Section III have been amended and by GO.Ms.No.608, Industries (MMC-2), Department dated 2.9.1989, further

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

been filed on the grounds that the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) constituted under Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 is empowered to review from the safety angle before the commissioning of the Atomic Energy Project and it … in the year 1998. 2.5. It is also his case that even in the environmental clearance obtained on 9.5.1989 it was emphasized that the area in which the project is to be commenced has been declared as

Citizens for a Just Society, Through Its Vice President, K. Pullaiah V ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 13, 18 and 27; Official Secrets Act, 1923

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR20; 2005(5)BomCR316

The apex Court was satisfied that the order issued by the Central Government under Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and its claim of privilege do not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference with the High Court … by the exercise of the powers conferred on the Government of India by the provisions of the Act. 9. Similarly, the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board was constituted in the year 1983 to ensure that the use of

Yash Thomas Mannully Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Academic Energy Regulatory Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') which is constituted under W.P.C.No.27960/2011 :2: the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. It is contended that the Board being the sole regulator and enforcement agency for the use of atomic … day of August 2015 JUDGMENT Shaffique, J This public interest litigation is filed challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 3(1), 4(2) and proviso, 4(4), 5, 6, 9(2), 15(2),16(5), 18(b), 19, 20, 32(10), 35 and 38(1) of the

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat Vs. Tata Ssl Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2003(155)ELT432(SC); (2003)11SCC396

his interrogation, it appeared that he was guilty of violating provisions of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 and Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and, therefore, a complaint was riled, against him after obtaining permission, under Section 3(1)(c), 3(1)(c) read with Sections … and, therefore, a complaint was riled, against him after obtaining permission, under Section 3(1)(c), 3(1)(c) read with Sections 9, 6(2)(a) and 6(2)(b) of the O.S. Act and 24(1)(d) read with 18(2) and 24(2)(d) read with Section 19(b)