Advanced Search Results
Indian Industrial Mineral Producers Welfare Association Vs. Government ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-26-2004
Commercial
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4 and 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(3) and 66A; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 5; Atomic Energy (Working of the Mines, Minerals and Handling of the Prescribed Substances) Rules, 1984 - Rule 3
2005(2)ALD471; 2005(3)ALT61
Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (for short 'MMRD Act') and the Rules made thereunder, apart from the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the Rules framed thereunder.2. It is stated that India has large reserves of beach sand minerals in … minerals separation of prescribed substances. So, the grant of lease under the impugned G.O. contravenes the provisions of Section 4 of MMRD Act. Therefore, the mining lease granted in favour of 4th respondent is illegal. It is also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Central Intelligence Officer Vs. the Commissioner of Inquiry (Mara ...
Kerala
Mar-17-2005
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 5(2) to 5(5), 6, 8, 8B, 8C and 12; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 40(2); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 18; Kerala Commission of Inquiry Rules, 1958 - Rules 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15 and 16; Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 - Order 11, Rule 1 - Order 16, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 77(3), 372 and 395; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 102, 103 and 482
2005CriLJ2944; 2005(2)KLT927
the Rules framed under the above said Act. He also invited our attention to Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.32. Now we shall consider how far the privilege claimed by the State as well as the Central Intelligence … any definite matter of public importance if it is of opinion that it is necessary to do so. Section 4 of the Act provides that the Commission shall have certain powers of a Civil Court, while trying a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReliance Infocom Ltd. Vs. Chemanchery Grama Panchayat
Kerala
Oct-12-2006
Civil
Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 11 and 12; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1991; Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 276; Kerala Municipal Building Rules, 1999; Constitution of India - Article 21
AIR2007Ker33; 2006(4)KLT695
frequency waves used for mobile phones are not covered under the definition of 'radiation' as given in the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and non ionizing radiations do not have the capability to ionize the matter with which they interact. Radiation … and related services to the general public. The Ministry of communication, Department of Telecommunication, Government of India under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 has awarded a licence to the petitioner to provide basic telephone services
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.R. Govindan and Another Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram
Chennai
Dec-10-2015
Land Acquisition
sensitive in the context of the national security and also the security of humanity like uranium - the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 only provides under Section 5 for prohibition or regulation of mining activity in such mineral. Under Section 10 … Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 make express declarations under Section 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of the mines and rights in or over the land from which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...
Chennai
Aug-31-2012
Land Acquisition
been filed on the grounds that the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) constituted under Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 is empowered to review from the safety angle before the commissioning of the Atomic Energy Project and it … by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (for brevity "NEERI") in January, 2003. The petitioner relies upon paragraph 4.3 of the said report which states about thermal pollution due to discharge of heated waters and emphasizes that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitizens for a Just Society, Through Its Vice President, K. Pullaiah V ...
Mumbai
Apr-28-2005
Trusts and Societies
Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Sections 13, 18 and 27; Official Secrets Act, 1923
2005(4)ALLMR20; 2005(5)BomCR316
The apex Court was satisfied that the order issued by the Central Government under Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and its claim of privilege do not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference with the High Court … fault line and the land mass of thickly populated Mumbai being actually of seven islands joined from reclamation. 4. The petitioners mention that on the west bank of Thane Creek is located Bhabha Atomic Research Centre ('BARC',
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskElectronics Corporation of India Limited Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-20-2012
Land Acquisition
to inspection of the writ petitioner-factory is covered in terms and in accordance with Section 23 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and hence the respondents -State and its officials in its Factories department have no right of inspection. Before … this Act. There is no dispute on the count that the petitioner answers the description of a factory. Section 4 of this Act conferred power on the State Government, either on its own or on an application made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWest Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. C.E.S.C. Ltd. Etc. E ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2002
ElectricityCivil
Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 22(1), 26, 27, 29, 29(2), 29(3), 29(4), 29(5), 29(6), 30, 37, 50 and 52; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 44, 44(3), 46, 49, 57, 57A, 57B, 58, 58(2), 59 and 76(2); Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission (Appointment of Chairperson and Members Functions, Budget and Annual Report) Rules, 1999 - Rule 4; West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2000 - Regulations 18, 24, 30, 31, 32 and 42; Contempt of Courts Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956; RDB Act - Sections 34; Finance Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 46B; Si
AIR2002SC3588; [2003(1)JCR194(SC)]; JT2002(7)SC578; 2002(7)SCALE217; (2002)8SCC715; MANU/SC/0859/2002
overriding effect over this Act to only two other enactments, namely, the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. While Section 52 gives overriding effect to the provisions of the 1998 Act, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith, in … the tariff to any consumer of electricity subject, of course, to the exceptions found in the said sub-section. Sub-section (4) mandates the holder of a licence or other person to distribute or supply electricity, by observing the methodologies
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMustaq Alias Mustafa Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-15-2006
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 135 to 139, 140, 151, 173, 173(2), 174, 175 and 176; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4, 5, 154, 155, 155(2), 156(1), 157, 190 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 12
2006(3)AWC3146
it is consistent with any other provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986) or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962) or the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989).16. It appears nothing in particular is there … under Section 135 of the Act any officer authorized by the State Government may take steps and since Sub-section (4) provides about applicability of Cr. P.C.. there is no bar to the police being part and parcel of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Dr. B.K. Subbarao and Another
Mumbai
Oct-12-1991
Criminal
1993CriLJ2984
as 'the Accused', has been discharged of certain offences punishable under the Official Secrets Act, 1923 and the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 a few facts that are relevant for the decision of this criminal revision application are alone being recounted … remain. That the Prosecution has got away with this is some achievement. 4. The Accused, as indicated by me, was arrested on 30-5-1988, and his … reconsider the charges and Judge Patel on a reconsideration of the materials before him dropped the charges under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act and held that only a charge under section 5 of the Official
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »